General Chat

Let me get this straight.
Genes want basic members to pay twice as much as before for the privilege of using their time & subs to other sites to help full Genes members who can´t find the information they want on this site.
Or am I just confused?

Jax, the discount is 20% not 20.12% otherwise the amount would be £15.94 instead of £15.96.

i recentely renews my subs in beginning of jan and i paid £7 something

KenSE

My comment about the 20.12% was about the discount we all got last year...not what they are giving now

I got the infomation from Jonesey, where he got it from I have no idea

It is if they played 'eeny miney, mo' to pick out who paid the higher rate. They are lying though their teeth about it beginning in December as renewals came up, so many members are saying they have renewed at the lower rate. It is definitely not alphabetical as if it was I would be one of the last to renew!

Elizabeth - that is not the point, a hike of double is not fair and certainly not the way they are applying it. OK 20% brings it down but it is still a large hike.

Divide & rule perhaps?
i still think that like so many things with Genes, the response you get depends on who is dealing with it.
"Take away the number you first thought of & divide by 2"

Exactly, Chris and Wisechild!

It came out in a thread nearly two years ago that they had been giving discounts to some members for a long time - regardless of length of membership.
When queeried, whoever drew from the lucky bag that day responded with a fib.

Don´t see how they hope to get away with pulling the wool over everyones eyes when clearly, not just one, but numerous members are reporting huge disparities in what they have been charged.
It only seems to be basic members who suffer.
haven´t heard of anything similar going on with the full members.
What does that tell you?.

It's only long term basic members who are affected because they have been paying the same low rates for several years with no increases.

Genes are trying to standardise the rate for basic membership to be the same for everybody.

Unfortunately for them they seem to have forgotten their promise to give 28 days notice of an increase, so those who haven't been given that notice have been able to argue.

The question is whether anyone has yet been given the required 28 days notice?

Kense - how do you explain that even on this thread there are those members who renewed in December and January and this past week at the lower rate?

They only gave me 28 days when I said I complained about 14 days, that they were in contempt of their own T & C and they promptly moved the goalposts and made it 28 and then said I was eligible for the higher rate!!!

I have no complaint had they issued a statement saying that as from a specific date, all renewals would be at the increased rate - BUT THEY ARE NOT - GR appear to be picking and choosing.

I am awaiting an explanation as to why they are doing this.

I queried the renewal price on their facebook page yesterday, pointing out that some people had renewed at the discounted rate and others were being charged the new rate, however, they have deleted my post.

I can't explain that Chris.

Ollie


Your post is still there on FB ................ or else someone called Olwen has posted the same question.



I'm quite in agreement that an increase was to be expected for those of us still paying the very low subs .............

...... but it is the underhand way that it has been done.


There should have been a general announcement .................. on Announcements, General Chat, and Genealogy Chat (at the very least) ................. that as of Jan 1 2013, the subscription rate for all Basic members would be xxxxxx

.......... and that announcement should have appeared at least as early as December 1st, allowing for more than the required 28 days notice.


I don't think there would have been one-quarter the upset if they had only done that


As it is, they are once again taking advantage of long-time, supportive, and supporting, members.


Those who have in many cases helped to make the name of GR over the years.




However ............... the way they have done it, all fits in with my long-time theory that GR is for the garbage ..................... BS will do away with it.

In which case, complaints need to be made to the Competition Board of the UK, because their agreement to the purchase of GR by BS HAD to include an agreement that GR would be maintained as a separate entity.


Of course, BS rationale (ie, excuse) for doing away with GR will undoubtedly be the fact that membership numbers have dropped, and it is no longer economically feasible to maintain it as a separate entity.




gawd .......................... I should have been a business person :-D



but I couldn't live with myself if I was that unethical!!!





sylvia

Oh, please don't Jax - too many people going. It's getting SO depressing on here :-(

I agree with most of what Sylvia in Canada has said although I´m not sure that the increase is justified, especially considering the amount of the hike.
I belong to other forums which, apart from the tree facility which most basic members seem not to use & which often isn´t working if they do want it, offer for FREE exactly the equivilent of what I get on here .
No contest.

----- Original Message -----
From: brightsolid Postmaster
To:
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 12:09 AM
Subject: Not read: Re: For Katie, please

Your message

To: brightsolid Postmaster
Subject: Re: For Katie, please
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 5:52:29 PM (UTC) Greenwich Mean Time : Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London

was deleted without being read on Sunday, January 20, 2013 12:09:20 AM (UTC) Greenwich Mean Time : Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London.



:-S

Weird - what gives with this Management?

I was just asking myself that same question Chris, I have been RR'ed for saying I don't agree with the new charges & going on to say why I did not agree. What I had written was no worse then what others have written, so who knows who may be next to get RR'ed. GR bullying again me thinks. I won't be renewing my membership as I would rather pay a little more in membership fee's on another site & get much more family tree info & better treatment than GR could ever give.

Platnum members should not be charged extra to look at things & Standered members should not be subbing for the gold & platnum members to have things to look at. but thats just my view.

Wonder if I shall receive a reply tomorrow.

I too have been rr'd or the post just removed

Dear jax

You recently added a message board response using your Genes Reunited membership.

It has been brought to our attention that the nature of this posting breaches the Message Board guidelines and terms and conditions of our website and the item has now been removed from Genes Reunited.

The removed message is as follow:

{CONTENT REMOVED}

Continuing to create content of this nature may result in your eventual removal from the site.

We thank you in anticipation of your co-operation and adherence to the terms of your Genes Reunited membership.


Kind Regards,


Genes Reunited Support Team


I am also wondering what was so bad about my post and others are still here???