Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
maryann
|
Report
|
10 Aug 2020 16:38 |
William Hartley Born 1881 Oswaldtwistle, Hull, Yorkshire Parents John Hartley and Mary Buckley Death 1970 Creston, Bristish Columbia, Canada Married to Wada Nishimoto. It looks as though he had a twin (not sure) John Hartley. Or maybe William changed his name John has the same death details. A Genes member found this for me on FMP in 2018 I have tried to find more information with no luck. I would love to know if John or William had family in Canada.
Many thanks
|
|
ErikaH
|
Report
|
10 Aug 2020 16:51 |
If William had a twin, you will be able to find his birth
have you looked?
Why didn’t you add this to the 2018 thread?
How likely is it that two brothers had identical death details?
|
|
ErikaH
|
Report
|
10 Aug 2020 16:51 |
Oswaldtwistle is NOT Hull, Yorkshire
It is in Lancashire
|
|
ErikaH
|
Report
|
10 Aug 2020 16:55 |
Canadian records are not as readily available as those for other countries.
have you tried to find info yourself on the familysearch site?
|
|
ErikaH
|
Report
|
10 Aug 2020 16:58 |
The only birth of a male Hartley with MMN Buckley in 1881+/- 1 year is for JOHN Hartley in Stoke on Trent area.
No marriage on freebmd for John Hartley to Mary Buckley
Please check your info
|
|
ArgyllGran
|
Report
|
10 Aug 2020 17:11 |
Which bit of what you've been told by your FMP informant definitely relates to the man in your tree? and who is that man?
Perhaps whoever found the info for you assumed he was this man ? Or perhaps this man is the one in your tree?
William Hartley in the 1911 England Census Name: William Hartley Age in 1911: 30 Estimated birth year: abt 1881 Relation to Head: Brother-in-law Gender: Male Birth Place: Oswaldtwistle, Lancashire, England Civil Parish: Oswaldtwistle County/Island: Lancashire Country: England Street address: 8 Higher Heys Oswaldtwistle Marital status: Married Occupation: Labourer In Cotton Mill Registration district: Blackburn Registration District Number: 474 Sub-registration district: Oswaldtwistle ED, institution, or vessel: 07 Piece: 25127 Household Members: Name Age Benjaman Granshaw 45 - single William Hartley 30 - married, brother-in-law, married under 1 year J E Hartley 30 - sister
Marriages Jun 1910 (>99%) GRUNSHAW Jane Ellen Blackburn 8e 949 HARTLEY William Blackburn 8e 949
His parents were Richard and Catherine per earlier censuses.
|
|
ArgyllGran
|
Report
|
10 Aug 2020 17:16 |
The Creston death - not born 1881:
William Hartley in the Canada, Find A Grave Index, 1600s-Current Name: William Hartley Birth Date: 9 May 1889 Birth Place: Huddersfield, Metropolitan Borough of Kirklees, West Yorkshire, England Death Date: 21 Jan 1970 Death Place: Creston, Central Kootenay Regional District, British Columbia, Canada Cemetery: Forest Lawn Cemetery Burial or Cremation Place: Creston, Central Kootenay Regional District, British Columbia, Canada
Bio supplied by someone on Findagrave, not necessarily correct:
Father - John Hartley Mother - Mary Buckley Spouse - Waka Nishimoto
Takenaka “Waka” Nishimoto Hartley Birth 26 Jul 1881 Hiroshima, Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima, Japan Death 17 Apr 1970 (aged 88) Nelson, Central Kootenay Regional District, British Columbia, Canada Burial Forest Lawn Cemetery Creston, Central Kootenay Regional District, British Columbia, Canada
There's no such birth in 1889 in Huddersfield.
However, there is this one, who may be a completely different person:
HARTLEY, WILLIAM mms BUCKLEY GRO Reference: 1889 J Quarter in HULL Volume 09D Page 303
Hull is not Huddersfield.
|
|
maryann
|
Report
|
10 Aug 2020 18:23 |
My informant gave me similar information as ArgyllGranI but not as much information. John/William would have been my Grandfathers brothers. I have looked on Ancestry, FMP, Familysearch with no luck, my search was in was in 2018, I have John's birth cert. and have tried for ages to find William's but cannot find it anywhere which is why I was unsure if he was a twin. Having said that on the 1891 census I have both William and John with siblings, their age is 10. I have been unable to trace a marriage cert. For John and Mary so I assumed they never married.I have also been searching another branch of my family. I am sending off for the Last information with GRO details from ArgyllGran as with the MMN being Buckley it must be my William 1889 not 1881.
Thank you so much, I may be getting somewhere with this now. Sorry, as you can gather I am not very good at this.
.
|
|
ArgyllGran
|
Report
|
10 Aug 2020 19:26 |
OK, so this is your family in 1891:
William Hartley in the 1891 England Census Name: William Hartley Gender: Male Age: 10 Relationship: Son Birth Year: 1881 Father: John Hartley Mother: Mary Hartley Birth Place: Hull, Yorkshire, England <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Civil Parish: Oswaldtwistle Ecclesiastical parish: St Paul Residence Place: Oswaldtwistle, Oswaldtwistle, Lancashire, England Registration district: Blackburn Sub registration district: Oswaldtwistle ED, Institution or Vessel: 5 Neighbors: Piece: 3409 Folio: 94 Household Members: Name Age John Hartley 40 - Oswaldtwistle Mary Hartley 35 - Ireland John Hartley 10 - Longton, Lancs Annie Hartley 8 - Rotherham Ellen Hartley 6 - Hull William Hartley 10 Mary Jane Hartley 1/12 - Oswaldtwistle Margt Ann Spence 33 - boarder
As William is listed after Ellen, he must be younger than her. The supposed age of 10 has been added by someone later, so the 1889 birth MAY be the correct one.
HARTLEY, MARY JANE mms BUCKLEY GRO Reference: 1891 M Quarter in BLACKBURN Volume 08E Page 460
HARTLEY, JOHN mms BUCKLEY GRO Reference: 1881 M Quarter in STOKE UPON TRENT Volume 06B Page 278
HARTLEY, HANNAH mms BUCKLEY GRO Reference: 1883 M Quarter in ROTHERHAM Volume 09C Page 622
As Mary was born in Ireland, maybe they married there.
The 1911 census says she was born in Cork.
|
|
maryann
|
Report
|
10 Aug 2020 20:01 |
I have Hanna, Mary Jane, John, Ralph 1893 (my Grandad) I have sent for William (which you kindly gave me the details) and I only have 1885 Ellen to find.
Many thanks to you.
|
|
ArgyllGran
|
Report
|
11 Aug 2020 11:51 |
After much searching, I don't see any sign of Ellen's birth record.
The birthplaces given in 1891 aren't entirely accurate. It says John junior was born in Longton, Lancs, whereas he was actually born in Longton, Staffs, as stated on the 1881 census, and borne out by his birth reg.
John senior was born in Oswaldtwistle according to 1891 census - but 1881 says he was born in Heslington, Lancs. This is probably wrong too - I think it should be Haslingden, Yorkshire, which is about 6 miles away from Oswaldtwistle.
John Hartley in the 1881 England Census Name: John Hartley Age: 32 Estimated birth year: abt 1849 Relationship to Head: Head Spouse: Mary Hartley Gender: Male Where born: Heslington, Lancashire, England Civil Parish: Stoke Upon Trent County/Island: Staffordshire Country: England Street address: 28 King Street Marital status: Married Education: Employment status: View image Occupation: Bricklayers Labourer Registration district: Stoke Upon Trent Sub registration district: Longton ED, institution, or vessel: 11 Neighbors: Piece: 2734 Folio: 36 Page Number: 13 Household Members: Name Age John Hartley 32 - bricklayers labourer Mary Hartley 30 - Ireland John Hartley - under 1 month, Longton, Staffs. Alfred Kettle 38 - lodger
|
|
Maddie
|
Report
|
11 Aug 2020 14:21 |
???? father John Last name Hartley Gender Male Birth year - Birth place - Baptism year 1851 Baptism date 01 Jan 1851 Residence Oswaldtwistle, Lancashire, England Place Oswaldtwistle County Lancashire Father's first name(s) John Father's last name Hartley Mother's first name(s) Margaret Mother's last name - Record set England Births & Baptisms 1538-1975 Category Birth, Marriage, Death & Parish Records Subcategory Parish Baptisms
1861 England, Wales & Scotland Census
York, Oswaldtwistle, Blackburn, Lancashire, England
First name(s) Last name Relationship Marital status Sex Age Birth year Occupation Birth place Ralph Hartley Head Married Male 45 1816 Coal Miner Oswaldtwistle, Lancashire, England Betty Hartley Wife Married Female 45 1816 - Oswaldtwistle, Lancashire, England James Hartley Lodger Unmarried Male 18 1843 Coal Miner Lancashire, England Thomas Baldwin Lodger Unmarried Male 15 1846 Coal Miner Accrington, Lancashire, England John Hartley Lodger Unmarried Male 12 1849 Coal Miner Haslingden, Lancashire, England Country England
|
|
maryann
|
Report
|
11 Aug 2020 16:12 |
That's interesting - I have just looked on 1881 John's birth cert. and you are right, he was born Longton, Staffs (thank you). So, if his father is also a John and his mother Margaret , is it possible for me to find a baptism cert. for 1851 John? also with the other members of the Hartley family does that mean Ralph Hartley is the father of 1851 John do you think. Thank you for your help.
|
|
maryann
|
Report
|
11 Aug 2020 16:19 |
I've printed the information off you have given me, I will have a look online to see what I can find out. Thanks again.
|
|
ErikaH
|
Report
|
11 Aug 2020 17:06 |
You must work on facts, maryann
Don't guess, or speculate
Is this the birth for which you have the cert?
HARTLEY, JOHN BUCKLEY GRO Reference: 1881 M Quarter in STOKE UPON TRENT Volume 06B Page 278
What - exactly - does it say about the mother?
|
|
ArgyllGran
|
Report
|
11 Aug 2020 17:07 |
Maddie has given you the possible baptism of the FATHER of John 1881 - not of John 1881 himself. .
As the baptism was on 1st Jan 1851, one of these will (probably) be the birth of that child (who may or may not be the right John) - IF he was born in Oswaldtwistle:
HARTLEY, JOHN mms TURNER GRO Reference: 1850 D Quarter in BLACKBURN Volume 21 Page 32
HARTLEY, JOHN mms SCHOLES GRO Reference: 1850 D Quarter in BLACKBURN Volume 21 Page 87
If the baptism is the correct one, his parents are John and Margaret.
Therefore Ralph is not his father. If he was, John would be listed as "son" and not "lodger".
Ralph might be an uncle or other relative.
EDIT:
Actually, these births below are also possibilities. 1891 census gives his YOB as c1851, but 1861 and 1881 say c1849.
HARTLEY, JOHN mms BURTON GRO Reference: 1849 J Quarter in BLACKBURN Volume 21 Page 17
HARTLEY, JOHN mms ASPDEN GRO Reference: 1849 S Quarter in BLACKBURN Volume 21 Page 82
I don't see the marriage of a John Hartley to a Margaret with any of those four surnames.
But if he was born in Haslingden, then there are these possible births:
HARTLEY, JOHN mms SPENCER GRO Reference: 1848 D Quarter in HASLINGDEN Volume 21 Page 409
HARTLEY, JOHN - GRO Reference: 1849 J Quarter in HASLINGDEN Volume 21 Page 516
HARTLEY, JOHN mms HELLEWELL GRO Reference: 1849 J Quarter in HASLINGDEN Volume 21 Page 550
And this one, if the baptism isn't the correct one:
HARTLEY, JOHN mms HEYWORTH GRO Reference: 1851 J Quarter in HASLINGDEN Volume 21 Page 558
|
|
ErikaH
|
Report
|
11 Aug 2020 17:35 |
The birth of John snr may not, of course, have been registered.
|
|
ArgyllGran
|
Report
|
11 Aug 2020 17:36 |
IF he was born in Haslingden, this MIGHT be him in 1851:
John Hartley in the 1851 England Census Name: John Hartley Age: 2 Estimated birth year: abt 1849 Relation: Son Mother's name: Mary Hartley Gender: Male Where born: Haslingden, Lancashire, England Civil Parish: Haslingden Phillimore Ecclesiastical Parish Maps: View related Ecclesiastical Parish Town: Haslingden County/Island: Lancashire Country: England Street address: Occupation: Condition as to marriage: Disability: View image Registration district: Haslingden Sub-registration district: Haslingden ED, institution, or vessel: 1e Neighbors: Household schedule number: 56 Piece: 2250 Folio: 92 Page Number: 14 Household Members: Name Age Mary Hartley 44 - married [untrue], Accrington Elizabeth Hartley 11 Hannah Hartley 9 Margaret Hartley 7 John Hartley 2
And if so, then his birth is the illegitimate one posted above.
His sisters' births:
HARTLEY, HANNAH - GRO Reference: 1842 M Quarter in HASLINGDEN Volume 21 Page 449
HARTLEY, MARGARET - GRO Reference: 1844 M Quarter in HASLINGDEN Volume 21 Page 474
HARTLEY, ELIZABETH - GRO Reference: 1840 J Quarter in HASLINGDEN Volume 21 Page 455
|
|
maryann
|
Report
|
11 Aug 2020 17:38 |
1881 John Hartley - mother Mary Hartley formerly Buckley - 28 King Street, Longton.
I'll print the other information off and hopefully one of them will tie in with the other information I have. Thank you.
|
|
maryann
|
Report
|
11 Aug 2020 17:40 |
I forgot to say, yes, it is the exact birth details I have.
|