Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
lisaking
|
Report
|
24 Apr 2009 19:55 |
just had a thought
please could you tell me if you know in 1904 to 1907 when someone got married what prof did they need to show to say who they were if any
could someone just walk into a reg office and say there names were smith and jones or did they need to show some prof such as birth cert
sean
|
|
lisaking
|
Report
|
25 Apr 2009 18:57 |
please please
will you do one thing for me and i promise i wont bother you untill the cert comes through
ive been looking at cences all day and the nelson thing still bothering me
i think martha was married to a charles nelson but dont think here name was gertrude i think it was lucy mace
please will you double check
sean ps there are also edward nelsons to fit age
|
|
FannyByGaslight
|
Report
|
25 Apr 2009 19:12 |
Sean ,you dont make sense Who is martha married to charles nelson? Her year of birth where born and what census do you want us to look at? And who is gertrude/lucy mace? born when and where. We cant see the census you are on about unless you tell us which one. viv
|
|
lisaking
|
Report
|
25 Apr 2009 19:30 |
sorry ment gertrude think that was her middle name
i think gertrude was also married before in 1901 cences lucy mace also lots of charles nelsons
im thinking maybe nelson died
can you recall the atkinsons john and esther named one of there children after his dead wife
|
|
FannyByGaslight
|
Report
|
25 Apr 2009 19:54 |
Yes I remember the child named after the first wife,it wouldnt have happened in my house!! VERY odd thing to do, But on the rest of it I am sorry but I still havent a clue what you want us to look at really. sorry. I am off out to the pub now,well it is saturday night. Hopefully Evie may have got it sorted by the time I return too squiffy to be able to do anything except sleep. viv
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
25 Apr 2009 20:48 |
Nice, Viv.
I have to go crash my Firefox so it will function again, and install the update while I'm at it I guess, so I'll be a while too ...
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
26 Apr 2009 00:21 |
Okay, if Gertrude was married before, her name at birth wasn't Mace.
Because she married as Mace -- and if she'd been born Mace and married before, she wouldn't have marred Boagey/Atkinson as Mace. Unless she was committing bigamy or otherwise trying to hide her first marriage for some reason.
There is very little point in trawling around censuses trying to find someone who might have married a Mace and then married Atkinson/Boagey!
Get the Mace+Atkinson marriage certificate and it will *tell* you whether she had been married before, and if so, what her name was before her first marriage.
That is the only way you're going to find that first marriage, if it existed, which I really don't think it did, and possibly any children of it.
But really, Sean, the thing is -- we have found Gertrude in the 1911 census, and she *was* born in Norfolk, and she was really barely old enough to have had a marriage before marrying Boagey/Atkinson -- so there really isn't any reason to think she wasn't the Gertrude Mace who was born in Norfolk.
|
|
sue
|
Report
|
27 Apr 2009 16:32 |
Sean i have found a birth any good?
louisa atkinson june 1910 Gateshead Tyne and Wear
Sorry if i missed this before on any one elses messages!
Do you think maybe that Dad William did some wrong and changed his name to start afresh?
Sorry just discovered that this Louisa died aged 8 in 1918
|
|
lisaking
|
Report
|
27 Apr 2009 17:22 |
thanks for that
ive had a look on 1911 cences as far as i can
ive found a louisa charles 1907 gertrude 1890 and 1875 frank around the 1884 year forgot to write it down all in birkenhead
viv evie what do you think
is there anyway to find out if they are the same people
sean
|
|
FannyByGaslight
|
Report
|
28 Apr 2009 01:15 |
You made a promise Sean and now you have broken it. Slap.. for you
|
|
Mistycat
|
Report
|
28 Apr 2009 19:59 |
Hi All,
Just thought I would pop by for a catch up, read the WHOLE thread...My goodness, what a tangled web..and I thought "my lot" were bad enough!!
Oooops look's like your in trouble Sean, never break a promise to a lady ;)
Misty x
|
|
lisaking
|
Report
|
28 Apr 2009 20:46 |
ive been trying all after to say sorry
its just people keep putting massages on then they get me going again
im going to do a jigsaw or something keep my mind off it
SORRY you wont hear from me again untill cert comes around the 1st i really do promise
anyway by the looks of all the treads your all going to be run off your feet what happened sean xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
|
lisaking
|
Report
|
30 Apr 2009 12:25 |
well its here
hope im forgiven
married-21st sept 1007 frank atkinson-24yrs -bachelor-coal miner- 11 edward street spennymoor father -john atkinson-deceased-coal miner
gertrude mace -25yrs-spinster 12 edward street spennymoor father-edward mace -deceased-fisherman
in the presence of
arther william sloddant mary ann atkinson
wasnt mary one of johns daughters
|
|
FannyByGaslight
|
Report
|
30 Apr 2009 21:50 |
I think the this edward is gertrudes father with wife louisa ,BUT i cant see a gertrude with them at all in 1891 or 1901 the only other one I can find in 1881 is on a large vessel that looks like merchant navy not a fishing boat and then dissapears from the census.
1881 England Census about Edward Mace Name: Edward Mace Age: 37 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1844 Relation: Head Spouse's name: Louisa Gender: Male Where born: Haddiscoe, Suffolk, England Civil Parish: Runham County/Island: Norfolk Country: England Street address: 10 Bure Place Condition as to marriage: Married Education:
Employment status: View Image Occupation: Mariner Registration district: Flegg Sub-registration district: East Flegg ED, institution, or vessel: 9 Neighbors: View others on page Household Members: Name Age Edward Mace 37 Louisa Mace 37 Edith E. Mace 9 Laura E. Mace 7 Sydney H. Mace 3 Richard J. Mace 1
|
|
FannyByGaslight
|
Report
|
30 Apr 2009 22:03 |
maybe not though as here he is hale and hearty in 1911 and not deceased.
HOUSEHOLD MACE LOUISA F 1845 66 Flegg Norfolk HOUSEHOLD MACE ALFRED CHARLES M 1882 29 Flegg Norfolk HOUSEHOLD MACE EDWARD M 1846 65 Flegg Norfolk HOUSEHOLD MACE FLORA F 1889 22 Flegg Norfolk
|
|
FannyByGaslight
|
Report
|
30 Apr 2009 22:06 |
But this edwards death is where gertrude says she was born and born about the same year as the one still alive in 1911
Deaths Sep 1902 (>99%) Mace Edward 55 Yarmouth 4b 22
|
|
lisaking
|
Report
|
30 Apr 2009 22:11 |
not to good at this but ive found 1901
pheabo mace 1820 edward mace 1852 lucy 1882 ..>>> may be gertrude william 1873 ellen 1875 george 1895 elizabeth 1898 all in winlaton durham
no sign of any of them in 1891
also found a nelson mace durham
i always recall you saying people used to use their middle names a lot
|
|
FannyByGaslight
|
Report
|
30 Apr 2009 22:33 |
where does this one go in 1911?? Cant see a death for her either
Births Jun 1902 (>99%) MACE Louisa Mary Norwich 4b 159
Or a marriage.
|
|
FannyByGaslight
|
Report
|
30 Apr 2009 22:40 |
With atkinsons visiting them But edward is a general labourer
1891 England Census about Lucy Mace Name: Lucy Mace Age: 10 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1881 Relation: Niece Gender: Female Where born: Blaydon, Durham, England Civil Parish: Winlaton Ecclesiastical parish: St Cuthberts Town: Blaydon County/Island: Durham Country: England Street address:
Occupation:
Condition as to marriage:
Education:
Employment status: View Image Registration district: Gateshead Sub-registration district: Winlaton ED, institution, or vessel: 9 Neighbors: View others on page Household Members: Name Age Joseph Blake 36 Martha Blake 33 Phoebe Mace 69 Edward Mace 40 William Mace 18 Lucy Mace 10 William Greminson 19 George Atkinson 35 Eliza Atkinson 30 John Oliver Atkinson 8 Frederick O Atkinson 6 Ada Atkinson 1
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
1 May 2009 00:20 |
In 1911, the place of birth of
ATKINSON GERTRUDE 1883 28 Sedgefield Durham
who was living with
ATKINSON CHARLES S 1909 2 Sedgefield Durham ATKINSON WILLIAM F 1884 27 Sedgefield Durham
was ***NORFOLK*** !!!
I searched with Norfolk as place of birth, and yes, she came up.
I tried Norwich, and no, she didn't. So it was Norfolk but not Norwich.
Births Dec 1884 Mace Gertrude Lilly Norwich 4b 145
The other places in Norwich reg dist were
Earlham Easton Heigham Lakenham
None of them work in 1911 -- but there were undoubtedly other dinky little places in the district.
Sean, have you looked at that 1911 census record? I forget.
You really need to, if not. If you have, what does it say for their places of birth?????
|