Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Glen In Tinsel Knickers
|
Report
|
26 Jul 2008 15:17 |
There is a chance that the fathers were still alive and the couple claimed to be 21 (and therefore avoid needing parental consent).
Based on the census returns given earlier Elizabeth seems fairly consistent with 1872 as her year of birth so she might have added a few months onto her age.
BUT;
There are two deaths that might be worth considering,
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deaths Mar 1892 (>99%) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Stuckey James 61 Islington 1b 226 Stuckey James 59 Whitechapel 1c 276
Glen
|
|
Darealjolo
|
Report
|
26 Jul 2008 15:35 |
Hi Glen,
I think the first death age 61 would be the better one as in 1891 census was aged 60 and also Islington is where they were living att he time.
|
|
Glen In Tinsel Knickers
|
Report
|
26 Jul 2008 15:44 |
I tend to agree, looks like mum died not long after
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deaths Mar 1896 (>99%) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Stuckey Leah 55 Islington 1b 129
|
|
Glen In Tinsel Knickers
|
Report
|
26 Jul 2008 16:08 |
I'm just adding this for reference, best to make a note or print it out for use later if it is relevant
Assuming James and Leah are the parents and the 1881 census posted above is correct this is the same household showing the details for James;
Name: James Stucky Age: 55 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1826 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Leah Father's Name: Daniel Gender: Male Where born: Langport, Somerset, England Civil Parish: St Pancras County/Island: London Country: England Street address: 4 Blandford Pl Condition as to marriage: Married Education:
Employment status: View Image Occupation: Road Laborer Registration district: Pancras Sub registration district: Kentish Town ED, institution, or vessel: 34 Neighbors: View others on page Household Members: Name Age Charles Stucky 15 Daniel Stucky 78 Elizabeth Stucky 9 George Stucky 11 James Stucky 55 John Stucky 18 Leah Stucky 43 Thomas Stucky 2 Walter Stucky 3
Source Citation: Class: RG11; Piece: 220; Folio: 21; Page: 36; Line: ; GSU roll: 1341048.
=============
The reference to Langport Somerset seems to suggest this is the marriage of James and Leah
Surname First name(s) District Vol Page
------------------------------------------------------------------ Marriages Sep 1860 (>99%) -------------------------------------------------------------------- BONNING Eliza Langport 5c 659 MALE Gerrard Langport 5c 659 Pipe Leah Langport 5c 659 Stuckey James Langport 5c 659
|
|
Glen In Tinsel Knickers
|
Report
|
26 Jul 2008 16:15 |
Again for reference, you can either use this to confirm things later or discount it as needed,
1871 England Census about James Stuckey Name: James Stuckey Age: 44 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1827 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Leah Gender: Male Where born: Kingsbury, Somerset, England Civil Parish: St Pancras Ecclesiastical parish: Christchurch County/Island: London Country: England Street address:
Occupation:
Condition as to marriage:
Disability: View Image Registration district: Pancras Sub registration district: Regent ED, institution, or vessel: 16 Household schedule number: 93 Household Members: Name Age Edward C Stuckey 4 George J Stuckey 1 James Stuckey 44 John Stuckey 8 Leah Stuckey 34 Mary Ann Stuckey 9
Source Citation: Class: RG10; Piece: 204; Folio: 12; Page: 15; GSU roll: 824592
+++++
1861 England Census about James Stuckey Name: James Stuckey Age: 33 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1828 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Leah Gender: Male Where born: Kingsbury Episcopi, Somerset, England Civil Parish: Kingsbury Episcopi County/Island: Somerset Country: England Street address:
Occupation:
Condition as to marriage: View Image Registration district: Langport Sub registration district: Langport ED, institution, or vessel: 17 Neighbors: View others on page Household schedule number: 9 Household Members: Name Age James Stuckey 33 Leah Stuckey 23
Source Citation: Class: RG9; Piece: 1630; Folio: 92; Page: 2; GSU roll: 542842
|
|
Glen In Tinsel Knickers
|
Report
|
26 Jul 2008 16:22 |
Again for reference, this looks like Leah before the marriage
1851 England Census about Leah Pipe Name: Leah Pipe Age: 14 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1837 Relation: Daughter Father's Name: John Mother's Name: Mary Gender: Female Where born: Kingsbury Episcopi, Somerset, England Civil Parish: Muchelney County/Island: Somerset Country: England Street address:
Occupation:
Condition as to marriage:
Disability: View Image Registration district: Langport Sub registration district: Somerton ED, institution, or vessel: 7 Neighbors: View others on page Household schedule number: 22 Household Members: Name Age Eliza Pipe 2 Jane Pipe 4 John Pipe 40 Leah Pipe 14 Mary Pipe 38 Rhoda Pipe 6 Sarah Pipe 9
Source Citation: Class: HO107; Piece: 1926; Folio: 402; Page: 7; GSU roll: 221083.
=======
I'll just throw this one in too, possibly the grandparents?????
1851 England Census about Leah Pipe Name: Leah Pipe Age: 65 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1786 Relation: Wife Spouse's Name: George Gender: Female Where born: Kingsbury, Somerset, England Civil Parish: Kingsbury Episcopi County/Island: Somerset Country: England Street address:
Occupation:
Condition as to marriage:
Disability: View Image Registration district: Langport Sub registration district: Somerton ED, institution, or vessel: 8c Neighbors: View others on page Household schedule number: 15 Household Members: Name Age Williamb Ailey 9 Ann Pipe 12 Gate Pipe 7 George Pipe 64 Leah Pipe 65 Mary Pipe 28 Hannah Talbott 50
Source Citation: Class: HO107; Piece: 1926; Folio: 455; Page: 5; GSU roll: 221083.
|
|
Darealjolo
|
Report
|
26 Jul 2008 17:26 |
Glen,
Thankyou for your help i will write all this down. So Daniel is James Father, i will look into finding more on him if i can but me and the census just dont get on at all. Have you come across James mum's name at all? As maybe as he had his dad living with him then maybe they were divorced or she has passed away. Thankyou Glen your very kind.
Jo
|
|
Glen In Tinsel Knickers
|
Report
|
26 Jul 2008 17:43 |
Hi again Jo
Daniel is recorded as father. To confirm it you would need the baptism record (James is a pre 1837 birth so there isn't a cert)
I will have a look for Daniel in the earlier years and post anything i find.
It might be that none of the things i have found are your family but at least if you have the details you know which to ignore next time!!!
|
|
Darealjolo
|
Report
|
26 Jul 2008 17:46 |
Hi Glen,
Oh ok, i thought they are my family lol. see im bit dim with all this. Didnt know you cant get certificates before 1837 right? Thankyou for looking about Daniel.
|
|
Battenburg
|
Report
|
26 Jul 2008 18:05 |
You need to look at parish records for pre 1837 births. Try www.familysearch.org. Look at the IGI ( International Genealogical Index)Extracted records are more reliable than submitted
|
|
Battenburg
|
Report
|
26 Jul 2008 18:29 |
1861 census. Daniel Stuckey 1806 Kingsbury Episcopi Somerset occ ag.lab. Mary wife 1801 no place of birth given
adress West Langbrook Kingsbury Episcopi Somerset
1851 census transcribed as Huckery ( Stuckey on image) Daniel Huckery 1806 West Lambrook Somerset.occ ag.lab. Mary wife 1806 West Lambrook James son 1828 West Lambrook occ ag.lab.
address West Lambrook Kingsbury Episcopi. which is in the Langport reg.district
James Stuckey claims hes from Langport in 1881
|
|
Glen In Tinsel Knickers
|
Report
|
26 Jul 2008 18:31 |
I can't find him in the '71 at the moment
1861 Daniel Stuckey Age: 55 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1806 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Mary Gender: Male Where born: Kingsbury Episcopi, Somerset, England Civil Parish: Kingsbury Episcopi County/Island: Somerset Country: England Street address:
Occupation:
Condition as to marriage: View Image Registration district: Langport Sub registration district: Langport ED, institution, or vessel: 16 Neighbors: View others on page Household schedule number: 46 Household Members: Name Age Daniel Stuckey 55 Mary Stuckey 60
Source Citation: Class: RG9; Piece: 1630; Folio: 87; Page: 10; GSU roll: 542842.
======
1851 England Census (image looks like Stuckey) about Daniel Huckery Name: Daniel Huckery Age: 45 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1806 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Mary Gender: Male Where born: West Lambrook, Somerset, England Civil Parish: Kingsbury Episcopi County/Island: Somerset Country: England Street address:
Occupation:
Condition as to marriage:
Disability: View Image Registration district: Langport Sub registration district: Somerton ED, institution, or vessel: 8c Neighbors: View others on page Household schedule number: 12 Household Members: Name Age Daniel Huckery 45 James Huckery 23 Mary Huckery 51
=========
1841 England Census about Daniel Stuckey Name: Daniel Stuckey Age: 35 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1806 Gender: Male Where born: Somerset, England Civil Parish: Kingsbury Episcopi Hundred: East Kingsbury County/Island: Somerset Country: England Street address:
Occupation: View Image Registration district: Langport Sub registration district: Langport Neighbors: View others on page Household Members: Name Age Daniel Stuckey 35 James Stuckey 14 Mary Stuckey 45
Source Citation: Class: HO107; Piece 949; Book: 9; Civil Parish: Kingsbury Episcopi; County: Somerset; Enumeration District: 16; Folio: 37; Page: 4; Line: 18; GSU roll: 474600.
|
|
Glen In Tinsel Knickers
|
Report
|
26 Jul 2008 18:39 |
The next stage is to find the birth certificate for Elizabeth Jane, if that confirms that James and Leah are her parents then it will make finding the references for the family easier.
The census can be a good indicator but to confirm everything you need something a bit more substantial, eg certificates or church records. Assuming for a moment that the details posted are correct then at least you have a flying start to that side of the family.
As for your original question about the Fisher name, i think that must lie with Walter Isaac Jackson and his side of the family.
|
|
Darealjolo
|
Report
|
26 Jul 2008 19:56 |
Ok i will get Jane Elizabeth's birth cert but which of these 2 should i get as not sure.
Jane Elizabeth Stuckey 1872 Pancras 2nd qtr 1b 183
Or
Elizabeth Stuckey 1872 Edmonton 3rd qtr 3a 181
The second dosent have Jane in the name!!
|
|
Glen In Tinsel Knickers
|
Report
|
27 Jul 2008 00:49 |
I think the best way forward is to apply for the certificate but use the checking point system
Basically you quote the year, quarter, volume and page number as usual but add the name of a parent. I might be wrong but i think the price goes up slightly from the usual £7, to be honest i have never tried a ref check but in a case like this i think it is worthwhile.
So let's just say you put Leah down as the checking point then if her name is recorded as the mother the cert will be issued. If her name isn't on the record then the GRO won't issue the cert and give you a part refund.
The main drawback is that the entry must be spelt the same on the cert as your application so if for example you put Leah but on the cert it is spelt Lear then they won't issue the cert.
Deciding which one is awkward, just on a hunch i would go with the first one you posted (Pancras). I would use Leah as the check point simply because it is a rarer name.
At the end of the day though the choice of which one and whether to add a ref check is yours to make but i believe it's your best option.
Glen
|
|
Battenburg
|
Report
|
27 Jul 2008 01:23 |
Daniel Stuckey born 1803 died 1888 dec qt Pancras gro ref 1b 120.
|
|
Darealjolo
|
Report
|
27 Jul 2008 08:35 |
Hi Glen,
Ok thankyou for the information. I will go with the first one then, was going to orer the second as Edmomton isnt far from Islington.
Jo
|
|
Darealjolo
|
Report
|
27 Jul 2008 08:37 |
Hi Margaret,
Thankyou for finding Daniel but is this his death? And was he born in Pancras aswell?
Jo
|
|
Glen In Tinsel Knickers
|
Report
|
27 Jul 2008 13:50 |
There are two Daniel Stuckey deaths in the area, both born about the same time
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deaths Dec 1882 (>99%) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Stuckey Daniel 80 Brentford 3a 47
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deaths Dec 1888 (>99%) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Stuckey Daniel 85 Pancras 1b 120
All i can say is that one of them is a Daniel who appears in the census and is consistently connected to Twickenham, the other one could well be the Daniel i posted census details for yesterday (time of the post was 18.31). He was born in Somerseat.
Regarding the birth certificate;
If the worst case happens and you have to order both then the "wrong" one isn't totally wasted, because there are two Stuckey familes in the area at the same time the information on the certificate could be useful at a later date.
Glen
|
|
Darealjolo
|
Report
|
27 Jul 2008 14:25 |
Hi Glen,
I see what you mean about they could all be related but say i got 1 or both certs i wouldnt know which is right anyway as dont know his parents names. Im still trying to figure this all out lol, sorry im useless with all this.
Jo
|