Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Darealjolo
|
Report
|
29 Jul 2008 18:24 |
Lol Glen,
Yes you are my hero : ) as you have helped alot with my tree.
Thankyou
Jo
|
|
Glen In Tinsel Knickers
|
Report
|
29 Jul 2008 11:10 |
You're welcome Jo
If it is the right one (i'm pretty confident) then i'm gonna be a hero...........if it's the wrong one don't tell your mum it was my fault.
Glen
|
|
Darealjolo
|
Report
|
29 Jul 2008 10:56 |
Hi Glen,
Thankyou for clearing it up for me, you are very kind helping me. I will order that cert then and hopefully it is the correct one.
Jo
|
|
Glen In Tinsel Knickers
|
Report
|
29 Jul 2008 10:45 |
In reply to; "Hi Glen, Im confused now lol."
---
I think my post above (added at 10.30 this morning) should clear things up a little bit.
The 1892 death for James and the 1881 census showing him as road labourer fit nicely with the details from the marriage certificate you have. (marriage cert of 1892 says he is deceased and a road laobourer)
It looks very likely that Elizabeth is the daughter of James and Leah.
James is always a labourer of some description, Leah is always his wife and Elizabeth is always recorded as daughter.
The '71 and '81 census are in Pancras, '91 in Islington, that fits with the death details i have posted.
Because the '71 shows Pancras it looks like the correct birth certificate you need should be;
Name: Jane Elizabeth Stuckey Year of Registration: 1872 Quarter of Registration: Apr-May-Jun District: Pancras (1837-1901) County: London, Middlesex Volume: 1b Page: 183
Personally i would order that one but add a ref check quoting Leah as the mother. It seems that for some reason the Jane part of her name wasn't used, she was probably known as Elizabeth but born Jane Elizabeth.
If it is the right certificate then the details i have put in the post give the family details back to the James and Leah mariage in 1860.
Glen
|
|
Darealjolo
|
Report
|
29 Jul 2008 08:32 |
Hi Glen,
Im confused now lol.
|
|
Glen In Tinsel Knickers
|
Report
|
29 Jul 2008 00:04 |
2nd reserve
There is a second Stuckey family in London at the same time, father called Daniel and a son called James (he never married and his occupation is servant), they are NOT your family but the death index entries for them are at very similiar times to your James and Daniel.
If and when you come to order the death certificates use the references in my last post, these two are the ones you DO NOT want to order.
Deaths Mar 1892 (>99%) Stuckey James age 59 Whitechapel 1c 276
====
Deaths Dec 1882 (>99%) Stuckey Daniel 80 Brentford 3a 47
|
|
Glen In Tinsel Knickers
|
Report
|
29 Jul 2008 00:04 |
Added at 10.30 Tues morning.
Sorted out who the parents for the 1872 birth should be!!! I'm 99.9% sure it is James and Leah.
Chronologically back from 1896 here goes.
++++ Deaths Mar 1896 (>99%) Stuckey Leah 55 Islington 1b 129 ++++
Jo has the cert for the following marriage, father of the bride is James Stuckey, road labourer, deceased.
Marriages Dec 1892 Buckingham Thomas Dalton Islington 1b 738 >>JACKSON Isaac Walter Islington 1b 738 Smith Annie Louisa Islington 1b 738 >>STUCKEY Elizabeth Islington 1b 738 TIPPETT Arthur Islington 1b 738
++++ Deaths Mar 1892 (>99%) Stuckey James 61 Islington 1b 226 ++++
1891; Name: James Stuckey Age: 60 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1831 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Leah Gender: Male Where born: Laudpert, Somerset, England Civil Parish: Islington Ecclesiastical parish: All Saints Town: London County/Island: London Country: England Registration district: Islington Sub registration district: Upper Holloway ED, institution, or vessel: 16 Neighbors: View others on page Household Members: Name Age
Alice Stuckey 10 Elizabeth Stuckey 19 Daur George Stuckey 22 James Stuckey 60 Head, occupation, Labourer Leah Stuckey 56 Wife Walter Stuckey 14 William Stuckey 2/12
-------------------------------
++++ Deaths Dec 1888 (>99%) Stuckey Daniel age 85 Pancras 1b 120 ++++
1881; Name: James Stucky Age: 55 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1826 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Leah Father's Name: Daniel Gender: Male Where born: Langport, Somerset, England Civil Parish: St Pancras County/Island: London Country: England Street address: 4 Blandford Pl Condition as to marriage: Married Education:
Occupation: Road Laborer Registration district: Pancras Sub registration district: Kentish Town ED, institution, or vessel: 34 Neighbors: View others on page Household Members: Name Age Charles Stucky 15 Daniel Stucky 78 Elizabeth Stucky 9 Daur George Stucky 11 James Stucky 55 Head. Occuoation Road Labourer John Stucky 18 Leah Stucky 43 Wife Thomas Stucky 2 Walter Stucky 3
Source Citation: Class: RG11; Piece: 220; Folio: 21; Page: 36; Line: ; GSU roll: 1341048.
-------------- 1871; Name: James Stuckey Age: 44 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1827 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Leah Gender: Male Where born: Kingsbury, Somerset, England Civil Parish: St Pancras Ecclesiastical parish: Christchurch County/Island: London Country: England
Registration district: Pancras Sub registration district: Regent ED, institution, or vessel: 16 Household schedule number: 93 Household Members: Name Age Edward C Stuckey 4 George J Stuckey 1 James Stuckey 44 Head Occupation, Labourer John Stuckey 8 Leah Stuckey 34 Wife Mary Ann Stuckey 9
Source Citation: Class: RG10; Piece: 204; Folio: 12; Page: 15; GSU roll: 824592.
-------- 1861 Name: James Stuckey Age: 33 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1828 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Leah Gender: Male Where born: Kingsbury Episcopi, Somerset, England Civil Parish: Kingsbury Episcopi County/Island: Somerset Country: England Registration district: Langport Sub registration district: Langport ED, institution, or vessel: 17 Neighbors: View others on page Household schedule number: 9 Household Members: Name Age
James Stuckey 33 Head, Occupation Agricultural Labourer Leah Stuckey 23 Wife
Source Citation: Class: RG9; Piece: 1630; Folio: 92; Page: 2; GSU roll: 542842. --------------
Marriages Sep 1860 (>99%) BONNING Eliza Langport 5c 659 MALE Gerrard Langport 5c 659 >>>>>Pipe Leah Langport 5c 659 >>>>>Stuckey James Langport 5c 659 Wrixon Elizabeth Bedminster 5c 659
Glen
|
|
Glen In Tinsel Knickers
|
Report
|
29 Jul 2008 00:03 |
Moody
Earlier in the thread i found the set for that family, as you get further back a Daniel Stuckey c 1803 appears (dad to James).
There is also another Stuckey family in Twickenham, dad is Daniel c1803 with a son James c1827, going through the Twickenam family it seems that all the bmd events for them are Brentford District.
I was going to post both sets of census and relevant bmd refs in consecutive posts but will have to leave it for tonight.
it might make it easier to follow if i add them in one place.
Glen
|
|
Glen In Tinsel Knickers
|
Report
|
28 Jul 2008 23:53 |
Don't mind me, just posting something for the 1872 Stuckey birth query
I wonder if this birth.......
Name: Elizabeth Stuckey Year of Registration: 1872 Quarter of Registration: Jul-Aug-Sep District: Edmonton County: Essex, Hertfordshire, Middlesex Volume: 3a Page: 181
Fits this '81 census......
1881 England Census about Elizabeth Stuckey Name: Elizabeth Stuckey Age: 8 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1873 Relation: Daughter Father's Name: Thomas Mother's Name: Caroline E. Gender: Female Where born: Highgate Civil Parish: Hornsey County/Island: Middlesex Country: England Street address: Wells Hill 2 Dorothy Cottages Education:
Employment status: View Image Occupation: Scholar Registration district: Edmonton Sub registration district: Hornsey ED, institution, or vessel: 14 Neighbors: View others on page Household Members: Name Age Annie Stuckey 11 Caroline E. Stuckey 34 Elizabeth Stuckey 8 Thomas Stuckey 35
Source Citation: Class: RG11; Piece: 1379; Folio: 80; Page: 42; Line: ; GSU roll: 1341335.
--------------
And this birth
Name: Jane Elizabeth Stuckey Year of Registration: 1872 Quarter of Registration: Apr-May-Jun District: Pancras (1837-1901) County: London, Middlesex Volume: 1b Page: 183
Fit with this '81 return....
Name: Elizabeth Stucky Age: 9 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1872 Relation: Daughter Father's Name: James Mother's Name: Leah Gender: Female Where born: St Pancras, Middlesex, England Civil Parish: St Pancras County/Island: London Country: England Street address: 4 Blandford Pl Education:
Employment status: View Image Occupation: Scholar Registration district: Pancras Sub registration district: Kentish Town ED, institution, or vessel: 34 Neighbors: View others on page Household Members: Name Age Charles Stucky 15 Daniel Stucky 78 Elizabeth Stucky 9 George Stucky 11 James Stucky 55 John Stucky 18 Leah Stucky 43 Thomas Stucky 2 Walter Stucky 3 Source Citation: Class: RG11; Piece: 220; Folio: 21; Page: 36; Line: ; GSU roll: 1341048.
First one is Edmonton birth district and Edmonton Census district
Second one is Pancras birth and Pancras census district.
Is this the clue needed to clarify which birth cert required.
|
|
Darealjolo
|
Report
|
28 Jul 2008 23:47 |
Margaret,
I got the cert just few days ago after making this post.
Brenda,
He is down as Walter Edward Jackson. Maybe that is his birth then.
|
|
Battenburg
|
Report
|
28 Jul 2008 23:35 |
Sorry you probably did in the beginning
|
|
Darealjolo
|
Report
|
28 Jul 2008 23:06 |
Margaret i have the cert.
Isaac's father is a Frederick Jackson and Elizabeth's father is James Stuckey, both down as deceased. Im sure i added it here in this post.
|
|
Darealjolo
|
Report
|
28 Jul 2008 23:03 |
Thats ok, i noted it down already. Who is this Walter Edward Fisher as date is 1868?
Im getting myself in a muddle now lol.
|
|
Battenburg
|
Report
|
28 Jul 2008 23:02 |
You should get the marriage cert of Elizabeth Stuckey to Isaac Walter Jackson. It will be interesting to see if there is a fathers name for Isaac.Possibly not.
|
|
Darealjolo
|
Report
|
28 Jul 2008 22:53 |
Has a reply done missing to do with no birth for Walter Fisher in St luke but there was a Walter Jackson in St luke? Now there is a birth for
Births Sep 1868 Fisher Walter Edward St Luke 1b 670
Who is?
Sorry everyone i am a pain i know.
Glen i would say now the first birth? i hope im right coz was about to order the other.
|
|
Glen In Tinsel Knickers
|
Report
|
28 Jul 2008 22:43 |
Going by the census returns i posted, and the deaths for James, Leah and Daniel it seems the family moved from Pancras to Islington reg districts at some point in 1892. The '71, '81 and '91 census returns are all in the civil parish of St Pancras (not quite the same thing as the reg district though.)
So which one of these births looks likely?
Name: Jane Elizabeth Stuckey Year of Registration: 1872 Quarter of Registration: Apr-May-Jun District: Pancras (1837-1901) County: London, Middlesex Volume: 1b Page: 183
Name: Elizabeth Stuckey Year of Registration: 1872 Quarter of Registration: Jul-Aug-Sep District: Edmonton County: Essex, Hertfordshire, Middlesex Volume: 3a Page: 181
|
|
Battenburg
|
Report
|
28 Jul 2008 22:43 |
Yes it is confusing when they keep changing names. My Darby grandmother married twice. I couldnt find her first marriage even though I knew her husbands surname. It was only after I found out about her father changing his name I found her marriage. She married as Florence D Burden.When I got the cert it was Darby as middle name. Her second marriage to my grandfather gave her name as formely Darby which was the name on her birth cert
|
|
Darealjolo
|
Report
|
28 Jul 2008 22:26 |
Hi Brenda,
I have no idea looks possible, confusing though when they carry on with the name. Thankyou for finding for me.
|
|
Darealjolo
|
Report
|
28 Jul 2008 22:20 |
Margaret,
Out of the 2 births for Elizabeth, 1 in Pancras the other in Edmonton which 1 do you think is right to order, as i want to order but as my mum is paying for certs i want to get the right one.
|
|
Darealjolo
|
Report
|
28 Jul 2008 22:18 |
Ah i see. I thought coz of the dates it must be the parents but now i can see that Walter was born 1865, Elizabeth 1872 and they had a Daughter born 1899. Sorry to be a pain. Now i know where Fisher comes from. Do you know the birth Ref for Walter please?
|