Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
JoonieCloonie
|
Report
|
14 Jul 2015 20:43 |
I'm not quite following.
Harold was a 2-year-old visitor in the Chapman household in 1911. Harold's father William was in Bagshot with his older children in 1911, a widower. It seems that Harold's mother Elizabeth had died in 1910, leaving William with the infant Harold and their other children.
EDIT - the above was based on the wrong William James Bushell, see posts below
'Tony states that he returned to the UK with his Father Harold in 1946 & Harold's Mother & Sister had died whilst he was away'
I don't see that in what Gritty posted. But yes it could be that William remarried not long after 1911 and Harold was reared with a stepmother.
there is a WJB marriage to Caroline Weir in 1915 in Croydon for example. No births with those names but it could have been a second marriage for her.
An equally likely option, a WJB marriage to Caroline A Martin in Farnham (covers Aldershot) in 1918, one possible birth to the marriage
There is a Caroline M Bushell death in Croydon in 1943, aged 64 ... and a Caroline Bushell death same place in 1934, aged 51 and also Caroline Bushell Surrey SW in 1935, aged 52
I don't think there is likely much doubt about the identity of Harold and his father in the 1911 census. There just weren't that many people with those names, let alone who fit together as clearly as they do. EDIT - I was half right! :-D
|
|
Gritty
|
Report
|
14 Jul 2015 20:51 |
I don't have time to look now.
Joonie- this is more information from the link I put up earlier:
My father joined the regular Army in 1929. It was not a good time to be looking for a job of any kind and like many other young men of his age he had no training, experience or qualifications to fall back on. The pay wasn’t good but the prospects for promotion, particularly in view of his previous territorial army were promising; and there would be a pension at the end. He was moreover anxious to get away from home. His father, gassed and wounded in the Great War, was hard on his three sons and my father as the eldest probably got more than his share of the broad leather belt his father wore, like many working men of the time, as a symbol of his authority in the home.....
My father’s beloved mother and sister had died while he was away. His younger brother served as a gunner throughout, but the youngest of the three had been captured during the battle of El Alamein and was one of those POWs in Germany who, in the dying days of the war were marched eastwards in appalling conditions to put them beyond reach of the liberating advancing allied army. Like so many others ordinary families we endured much in the two great wars. My grandfather’s small terrace house was overcrowded and while I was admitted to my father’s old school and passed the 11+ this was not the life he intended for me when he brought me home...
|
|
JoonieCloonie
|
Report
|
14 Jul 2015 21:20 |
Here we go, 1911
Name: Caroline Maud Weir Age in 1911: 29 Estimated birth year: abt 1882 Relation to Head: Head Gender: Female Birth Place: Croydon, Surrey, England Marital Status: Married Years Married: 10 Estimated Marriage Year: 1901 Occupation: Dressmaker
Name: William James Buckell Age in 1911: 25 Estimated birth year: abt 1886 Relation to Head: Boarder Gender: Male Birth Place: Seven Oaks, Kent, England Marital Status: Single Occupation: Postman
Civil Parish: Croydon County/Island: Surrey Country: England Street address: 103 Cherry Orchard Road, East Croydon Registration district: Croydon
Caroline Maud Weir 29 Frederick William Weir 8 Mary Ann Weir 6 Edith Weir 4 William James Buckell 25 Harry Jude 24
I had the right Harold, wrong William James
now that's a little complicated :-)
but it does take us to the Caroline M Bushell death in Croydon in 1943, aged 64, I think
Births Sep 1885 Bushell William James Sevenoaks 2a 635
Name: William J Bushell Birth Date: abt 1886 Date of Registration: Jun 1956 Age at Death: 70 Registration district: Croydon Inferred County: Surrey Volume: 5g Page: 69
|
|
JoonieCloonie
|
Report
|
14 Jul 2015 21:30 |
Marriages Jun 1901 COOPER Caroline Maud Croydon 2a 500 WEIR William Croydon 2a 500
Births Dec 1912 also registered as Weir Bushell Stanley Cooper Croydon 2a 451
Births Sep 1916 Bushell William J Cooper Croydon 2a 450
perhaps the sister who died was one of the two in the 1911 household ... yes I think
Deaths Dec 1941 Weir Mary A 36 Croydon 2a 1142
|
|
JoonieCloonie
|
Report
|
14 Jul 2015 21:50 |
I suspect this was Caroline's husband
http://www.cwgc.org/find-war-dead/casualty/563729/WEIR,%20W
WEIR, W Rank: Lance Corporal Service No: S/4202 Date of Death: 20/09/1915 Regiment/Service: Seaforth Highlanders 8th Bn. Grave Reference: I. F. 7. Cemetery: FOSSE 7 MILITARY CEMETERY (QUALITY STREET), MAZINGARBE
the Bushell-Weir marriage was in the quarter following that death
from Ancestry
Name: William Weir Birth Place: Glasgow, Lanarkshire Death Date: 20 Sep 1915 Death Place: France and Flanders Enlistment Place: Govan, Lanarkshire Rank: L Corporal Regiment: Seaforth Highlanders Battalion: 8th Battalion Regimental Number: S/4202 Type of Casualty: Killed in action Theatre of War: Western European Theatre
also medal cards (search using S/4202)
register of personal effects names sister Agnes Calder
this could be a completely wrong guess at his identity of course and is just of peripheral interest
|
|
JoonieCloonie
|
Report
|
14 Jul 2015 22:40 |
Name: Stanley Bushell Birth Date: 19 Sep 1912 Date of Registration: Mar 1979 Age at Death: 66 Registration district: Sleaford Inferred County: Lincolnshire Volume: 7 Page: 2281
could have married in Sleaford 1936
Name: William James Bushell Birth Date: 31 Jul 1916 Date of Registration: Mar 1982 Age at Death: 65 Registration district: Croydon Inferred County: Surrey Volume: 11 Page: 1717
could have married in Croydon 1946/1954 possible births to the first, with a child named for mother
since they are siblings of Harold, their children would be your uncle's first cousins, with whom he would share grandfather William James
also for the record
Name: Harold Bushell Birth Date: abt 1910 Date of Registration: Jun 1961 Age at Death: 51 Registration district: Croydon Inferred County: Surrey Volume: 5g Page: 15
and surprise
Births Dec 1909 BUSHELL Harold Croydon 2a 234 WEIR Harold Croydon 2a 234
the law required that the child of a married woman be registered in her husband's name regardless of paternity (the presumption of legitimacy) but the birth could be double registered in the name of the father who acknowledged the child
|
|
Kim
|
Report
|
15 Jul 2015 12:41 |
Ooh, this is a lot to take in!! Do we assume then that Harold was the child of Caroline Weir but took the Bushell name? Or was he the Son of William & Elizabeth Bushell? I think what has confused me is that Harold is not listed on the 1911 census with Caroline & yet he would have been 2 yrs old? Yet he is also not on the same census with William & Elizabeth? Plus if Caroline & William married in 1915 then was Stanley William Bushells child or Weir's child as he was still alive in 1912, I'm assuming William J Cooper Bushell was Caroline & William Bushells child as obviously William Weir was dead then & Caroline & William Bushell had married in 1915? Also did Harold think then that Caroline was his Mum & when he returned with Tony n 1946 she had passed away? As Caroline had died in 1943. I'm just a bit confused as to where Harold was when he was a child & who with?? Especially as Elizabeth if this was his proper Mother had died a year after his birth? Some people surely led complicated lives!!! :-|
|
|
JoonieCloonie
|
Report
|
15 Jul 2015 13:20 |
hm, I don't know who William and Elizabeth Bushell are!
ah I see -- my first failed attempt to identify Harold's parents that I'd tried to write off. :-)
No, that William and Elizabeth fit so well ... but they wuz wrong. I didn't delete all that because I didn't want to make the discussion incoherent. But I edited that info to identify it as wrong-o.
I haven't figured out a connection between Harold and the family he was visiting. The big problem is that there is no marriage I can find for the Chapman couple! I thought Jane Susan Chapman might be a sister of Caroline Cooper Weir or of William Bushell, but haven't really looked for a connection yet, in the absence of a marriage to show the wife's surname.
So, leaving that William and Elizabeth in the dust, we have
William James Bushell, postman ('Buckell' per Ancestry, no wonder I didn't find him - I went looking for Caroline Weir and found her ... with William in her household) and Caroline Maud Cooper first married to William Weir, who presumably died so she could marry William Bushell
Caroline Maud Cooper was married to William Weir in 1901 but apparently cohabited only briefly. Harold, at least, was William Bushell's child - the older children were registered as Weir only so may be children of the Cooper-Weir marriage. But Caroline Cooper Weir and William Bushell were cohabiting by 1911 and Harold was their child together.
Stanley born in 1912 was William Bushell's child. The law required that he be registered in Caroline's husband's surname (this was to protect women and their children from unsubstantiated and unprovable allegations of adultery). But William Bushell formally acknowledged him by registering him also as Bushell.
Caroline was definitely Harold's mum, and William Bushell was definitely his dad -- Harold too was double registered as Caroline's child (as Weir) and as William Bushell's child (as Bushell).
also you're just not used to copies of freebmd entries ...
Births Sep 1916 Bushell William J Cooper Croydon 2a 450
means William J Bushell, mother's surname Cooper, Croydon, vol 2a page 450
if you do that search at freebmd it is clearer, and if you do it for Harold and Stanley and click on the page numbers, you will see that the list of names on the page includes them twice, under both surnames ... always click, I tell myself ...
so not so terribly complicated
it seems that Caroline had two daughters with her husband Weir (although only the DNA would say for sure), then Harold, Stanley and William with partner/husband Bushell
So Caroline was your uncle's grandmother for sure - the only reason we're poking into their lives here being him of course! otherwise I'd be saying we shouldn't be talking about people's parents' and grandparents' private lives this way :-)
|
|
Kim
|
Report
|
15 Jul 2015 14:59 |
Ok I see now that's much clearer! As you say though what Harold was doing with the Chapmans I'm not quite sure? Perhaps if the baby(Harold) was not known about by Caroline's husband they put him with friends/family? I found a marriage between Mark Chapman & Jane Shepherd in 1886 so no cooper connection there? It's a mystery!! But at least I have so,e relevant info to go on now, thanks! I will now try to contact Tony in the hopes it is the one still alive in Leighton Buzzard who may be my Uncles step brother. Also see if I can find children of Stanley & Williams as they will related to my Uncle too. I see that both Stanley & William died some time ago but I'm hoping they had children that I can trace for my Uncle? Much appreciate all your time with me on this, it's amazing what can be found out!!
|
|
JoonieCloonie
|
Report
|
15 Jul 2015 15:21 |
It's actually not that unusual to see babies and toddlers farmed out in the censuses, usually to relations of some sort. Somebody in the household may have been sick, or auntie and uncle just wanted a baby for a visit, I dunno!
I did see that Chapman-Shepherd marriage, you're right ... I think I persevered looking for a Jane Susan but that could be the one. Or they just weren't married either. As you well know, that wasn't all that unusual either. :-)
I'm dead tired with long hours of work to go so see how you and anybody else who can help can get on with tracing cousins, and I'll look in from time to time ...
oh and ps - the situation of a woman with a 'boarder' (or a man with a 'housekeeper') in the census is also very common, generally where one party in each case wasn't free to marry :-)
they may have represented themselves socially as a married couple, but told the truth on the census ... I mean, the truth except for them not really operating at arm's length!
|
|
Kim
|
Report
|
15 Jul 2015 15:47 |
Thank u so much for all your help Kind regards Kim
|
|
JoonieCloonie
|
Report
|
15 Jul 2015 17:29 |
Thank Gritty most! I came along lately and did my robot brain thing but Gritty found the really neat s**t :-)
|
|
Kim
|
Report
|
15 Jul 2015 19:11 |
Thank you to everyone who helped with this request!
|