General Chat

YES PAT, I TOTALLY AGREE WITH YOU. HE HAS TOTALLY LOST EVERYONE......... SUCH A SHAME! ALL WE CAN HOPE FOR IS THAT THE VERDICT WAS CORRECT AND THAT MICHAEL JACKSON CAN PROVE HIS INNOCENCE.

Peter have you heard some evidence we have not from 6000 miles + away how can you make that statement that he is a pervert, if he had been found guilty I would have agreed but he has not so he is innocent end of story.! Dave

I think Peter may have watched the Martin Bashir documentry....where Michael openly admits to taking boys to bed with him Sue xx

I had a young couple at the centre where i work who were expecting thier first child, he was the most caring and loving chap to his partner , and was so excited about the baby . She went to hospital, baby was born, and they came backto the centre. i was called to a meeting at social services and told that this chap could not have unsupervised visits to his new born child, his partner had to sign a document to say she would not allow him near the child unless a social worker was present at all times, i had to sign a document to say i would do the supervised visits by appointment only, and if he was seen near the centre at any other time we had to inform them, and they would remove the child. It was said that when in a previous relationship he had a son ,at six weeks old the child was taken to hospital where it was found to have suffered brain damage, through being shaken, they could never prove which one of the parents had harmed this child, so they both were not allowed to have children, his ex had another child and it was taken away at birth. I could not believe this caring chap could have been responsible for harming this child, the child was 4yrs old at this time ,he is blind, death and cannot even sit up. Then one day he admitted to another resident when they met up one day that he had shaken the baby, he had held it by its ankles and shook it in a fit of temper, i reported this straight away, as his ex was being punished also for something she hadn't done, her second child was taken from her. but they could do nothing as it was hear say, and the person who had told me of his confession would not give a statement. how wrong i was. this chap was caught at the flat where his partner and new baby were living, so the baby was taken into care. it was never returned to its mother.And this chap has never been punished for what he did. This chap was very clever. Is this the case with Michael Jackson.

Ps people are going to have their own views on this verdict...of course they are. I personally think he is as guilty as hell, and an innocent verdict doesnt make any difference in my mind. Wrongfull verdicts have been given out before. I personally think that is what has happened in this case Sue xx

Hi, Im in America... and no that doesnt surprise me!! Well be warned and feel sorry for the kid who is the next victim.. Isnt it amazing what media coverage does for you.. I know what I would do with a man that admits to sleeping with kids!!! No I dont want paying for the job either!! Debs x P.s as posted on another thread.. Still a dirty old man!!

i hope he goes back to pop, and continues making great records. ps, oh!!!!! i'm not a fan, incase anyone thinks i am,, tammy wynette is more my style lynnxx

Sue of course I watched that documentry and thought he was guilty,do you not think the jury watched it as well I do. They were also shown other evidence we wasnt shown in 'Bashirs' indicment, lets open our minds he has been found not guilty so that is what he is!!! Davex

justice for Jackson.........like millions of others, i too am relieved and delighted that his ordeal has ended rightfully in his favour.

Dave I appreciate what you are saying. But nothing...and I mean nothing...will make me think for one minute that MJ is innocent. The world could not convince me...so 12 people have no chance. The verdict was innocent....that doesn't make MJ innocent though. I know of other cases as we all must know..where innocent people have been found guilty and guilty people have been found innocent. Travesty...absolute travesty Sue xx

One word......GUILTY!!!!

Sue, Your so right honey, they all knew that OJ was guilty, but again being part of the media coverage gave them their 15 mins of fame! Jackson is no different, how much money can the jurors make from the trial?? Face it guys thats what this country is about! Shame on them Debs x

...and on that note I'm off to bed. My mind is made up so there's no point going on about it really. We will all have our own opinions on this. That's ok and how it should be. Sue xx

DB He DID take young teens into his bed. That is not in dispute. It is what happened after that...

Tell me if you think he is guilty somebody lay the evidence on here you cant can you! Only what you have heard in the press.The jury have found him innocent so that is what it is. I have said earlier he is a sad and probaly ill person but the jury have found him innocent of all charges so that is what he is Innocent.I went along with the Press evidence till today but I would like to think I am open minded enough to accept a jury that has SEEN ALL THE EVIDENCE'S judgement. Davex

Dave I can only agree with you I haven't bothered keep adding to the threads but wanted to show my support for what you are saying. Pat x

Dave i agree with what you say.....i feel he is Guilty though. I cant change the verdict.....i just have my opinion.

Peter when my son was 12 he often used to jump in our bed on a Sunday morning,I know you will say that was my son it is ok.Micheal Jackson has been a fool and he should have learnt from his first experience with Jordy Chandler a few years ago. But Jackson is a very naive unstable character but not I believe a Perv,and that is what the court have found today. Dave

Would also like to support what your saying Dave. I think i've always known that even with a NOT GUILTY verdict, Joe public would still be casting stones.

Thank you Pat thank you Strump we will agree to disagree as they say. Davex