General Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
that missing aircraft
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
AnnCardiff | Report | 16 Mar 2014 17:27 |
any theories? I'm thinking that the majority of the passengers would have been in possession of a mobile phone, so if the plane is still intact and the passengers maybe held captive somewhere, why wouldn't one of them made contact with someone - was it a hijack and all phones were confiscated> |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Porkie_Pie | Report | 16 Mar 2014 17:39 |
Mobiles require a signal to and from a transmitter the transmitter range may have been exeeded, unless you have a satellite connection then a mobile device is useless once out of range |
|||
|
Magpie | Report | 16 Mar 2014 17:49 |
It happened in the night Ann, or so I understand, therefore the passengers would mostly have been asleep. By the time they woke up (if they did), and realised what was happening, the airplane would have been miles off course and maybe flying too high for mobile phone contact; Or, as you say, a highjack and all phones confiscated. The whole thing is a complete mystery, quite extraordinary. What I find disturbing is that the transponder on all planes can be turned off!! surely this should be impossible under ANY circumstances, why would any pilot want to? unless they are up to no good. under normal circumstances pilots would want people on the ground to know where they are, so why on earth have a system that a rogue ??? can turn off, making it impossible for them to be tracked.. Those poor poor people, it doesn't bear thinking about. |
|||
|
Malcolm | Report | 16 Mar 2014 17:54 |
Where's JAMES BOND 007, He would find it. |
|||
|
Bobtanian | Report | 16 Mar 2014 18:13 |
I should think that the transponder/squark is only in use during flight, and switched off on the ground........but yes I also find it odd that a commercial aircraft could be invisible, in the air |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Magpie | Report | 16 Mar 2014 18:25 |
Malcom, In these terrible circumstances a comment like that is totally inappropriate, in fact it is an incredibly insensitive thing to say, and that's putting it mildly. |
|||
|
JoyBoroAngel | Report | 16 Mar 2014 18:54 |
Anybody wanna see my new plane |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Magpie | Report | 16 Mar 2014 19:08 |
Ann, I had hoped that this was going to be a serious post discussing an awful event, and that we would be discussing what has happened to this plane, what has become of these poor people. I'm sure you thought the same, and like me are disappointed that for some it it seems to be a subject for jokes and general frivolity. I won't be posting anymore which is pity and I wouldn't blame you if you 'pulled' it. I can only suppose that you 'jesters' have never experienced a terrible personal event in your lives or that you are simply without any sympathy or empathy whatsoever. |
|||
|
McB | Report | 16 Mar 2014 19:09 |
Good chance all the passengers are alive though |
|||
|
Mersey | Report | 16 Mar 2014 19:09 |
Think thats abit harsh Magpie :-S |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Magpie | Report | 16 Mar 2014 19:11 |
You do?! You people baffle me! |
|||
|
JoyBoroAngel | Report | 16 Mar 2014 19:11 |
keep ya wig on magpie |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Kense | Report | 16 Mar 2014 19:34 |
The pilots must have the ability to switch off a transponder (and any electical equipment) in case it starts to overheat. |
|||
|
Graham | Report | 16 Mar 2014 19:55 |
Hijackers confiscating peoples phones wouldn't make the plane invisible. Those phones could still be tracked regardless of who was in possession of them. The fact that the phones haven't been traced means they are out of range, not in the hands of terrorists. |
|||
|
AnnCardiff | Report | 16 Mar 2014 20:04 |
I feel the opposite - the more times goes on the more hope I have that they will eventually find it |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Phyll | Report | 16 Mar 2014 20:15 |
I'm sure someone somewhere knows more thatn they are letting on. Hope everyone will be found safe, |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Kense | Report | 16 Mar 2014 20:21 |
The trouble is that individual countries do not want to reveal how good or bad their primary radar tracking is. |
|||
|
SueMaid | Report | 16 Mar 2014 20:26 |
I would think that if the plane was hijacked that some demands would have been made by now. I also think that perhaps a terrorists group would have claimed responsibility. |
|||
|
AnninGlos | Report | 16 Mar 2014 20:27 |
I feel for the relatives, is there hope or not? How awful to be in limbo. And definitely not a subject for jokes i agree magpie |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Kense | Report | 16 Mar 2014 20:29 |
The fact that it wasn't tracked live implies that there was no air defence cover at the time. That is unless the aircraft flew very low, in which case the range of the aircraft would be significantly reduced. |