Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

this is a puzzle for me

Page 1 + 1 of 2

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Kate

Kate Report 8 Feb 2006 13:07

Hmm... yes, it is a puzzle. There is a case in my partner's family tree that may be similar. One of his rellies, a Robert Kenyon, is unmarried and living with his mother in 1861. In 1871 he is married to a Leah and has son Alfred age 17. But in 1861 Leah was unmarried and didn't have any children with her! Luckily, in 1881 the son is called 'Alfred K. Bamber' (still living with his father, so I know it's him), and going back to 1861 I found an Alfred Kenyon Bamber living with his (unmarried) mother Alice Bamber. (Alice died between 1861 and 1871, I found it but can't remember exactly when now). Alice would have been about 29 when Alfred was born, so why she and Robert didn't get married, I have no idea. Anyway, your problem could be a similar case, but if they didn't helpfully give William the middle name 'Dollery' when he was born, it might not be so easy to figure out! Kate.

Margaretfinch

Margaretfinch Report 8 Feb 2006 13:37

Hi Kate I don't know much about the Dollery family . Frederick Dollery married my great/grandmother in 1892 her name Mary Ann Goodchild I know all about her it is this William that is living with them in the 1901 census and down as son. Frederick is on the 1881 census with his father Charles and mother Ellen living in Winkfield Berkshire but I can't seem to find anything earlier than that. Margaret

Esta

Esta Report 8 Feb 2006 13:46

1871...........found this Charles Dallery abt 1834 Hurst, Berkshire, England Head Winkfield Berkshire Ellen Dallery abt 1835 Hampshire, England Wife Winkfield Berkshire Fredrick Dallery abt 1867 Winkfield, Berkshire, England Son Winkfield Berkshire George Dallery abt 1870 Winkfield, Berkshire, England Son Winkfield Berkshire Mary Jane Dallery abt 1869 Winkfield, Berkshire, England Daughter Winkfield Berkshire

Margaretfinch

Margaretfinch Report 8 Feb 2006 13:58

Thanks Esta no wonder I could not find it how do you put it in the search to find it spelt different thank you Margaret

Merry

Merry Report 8 Feb 2006 14:04

If you are feeling flush, then here's an idea..... In 1901 ''your'' William Dollery (aged 14) is the only person of that name recorded as living in Berkshire. In 1912 there is this marriage for the same area: Surname Forename Spouse District Page No Event Quarter Year Dollery .....William .....Hughes Windsor2c 1123 Marriage Q4 1912 So you could get the marriage cert and see if he mentions a father! Merry

Kate

Kate Report 8 Feb 2006 14:07

Yes, Margaret, I understand all that. What I was trying to say is, maybe William was Frederick's son by some other woman, but born 'illegitimate' so registered at birth under the woman's surname, but changed his surname to Dollery when he went to live with his father? But if this is what happened, and he wasn't originally given 'Dollery' as a middle name, it could be very difficult to work out who his mother was. I just thought it might have happened like that because it reminded me of the example I have given above. Kate.

Margaretfinch

Margaretfinch Report 8 Feb 2006 14:37

Thanks Kate see what you mean now stupid i am , and Merry I will do that get the certificate he married a Bertha Hughes thankyou Margaret

Esta

Esta Report 8 Feb 2006 15:14

Margaret The trouble with census transcriptions is the amout of times things are mis-transcribed - The surname being the worse ( I think ) When I search I rarely use the surname. I would look for the exact spelling just to check but then it's ususally either the first 3 letters followed by *.............or I find it easier to use the first name and birth details then just go down the list of reults for possibles. It's just practice after a while you can spot Mis-transciptions a mile off ....( Most ofthe time ) Esta

Margaretfinch

Margaretfinch Report 8 Feb 2006 15:28

thank you Esta Margaret