Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Worcester Union Workhouse 1901
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Ann | Report | 31 Mar 2009 11:08 |
Is anyone able to access the residents of the Union Workhouse in Worcester for 1901. I am looking for Kate Dyer who died there in 1904. Ditto 1891 as I think she may have been resident then. Thanks |
|||
|
Helen in Bucks | Report | 31 Mar 2009 11:27 |
This is the Ancestry ref for the Worcester Union Workhouse in the 1901 census, Class: RG13; Piece: 2782; Folio: 108; Page: 10. |
|||
|
Helen in Bucks | Report | 31 Mar 2009 11:40 |
Have had a scan through the 13 pages and can't find a Kate or Katherine with a surname that looks anything like Dyer. |
|||
|
Ann | Report | 31 Mar 2009 19:31 |
Many thanks Helen. I emailed Worcester Records Office yesterday and they have today told me that although they have many administrative records for the Workhouse they do not have any for the period 1890 to 1904 which is when we think Kate was in there. She died in there in 1904 and was not around in the 1891 census when her daughter was a year old, or the 1901 when she was 11. |
|||
|
Ann | Report | 31 Mar 2009 22:15 |
|
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 1 Apr 2009 06:36 |
when was she born? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Ann | Report | 1 Apr 2009 23:49 |
Hi Sylvia |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 2 Apr 2009 03:21 |
Ann.Do you think this is a possible for Kate in 1901?? I know her age is a bit out. I asked for Kate franc* b. 1853+/-5 yrs, Worcestershire |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 2 Apr 2009 03:40 |
can't find anything on the 1891 census |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Ann | Report | 2 Apr 2009 14:11 |
Sylvia - I don't really think it could be our Kate. We know she was baptised in 1853 (IGI). On her death certificate she was 52 in 1904. Have looked on IGI and there don't appear to be any Francise or Francese. Thank you for taking the time to look for me. |
|||
|
Netty | Report | 2 Apr 2009 15:28 |
Hi Ann, Searched, page by page, 1901 Worcester General Infirmary & worcester Union Workhouse, nothing showing for Kate Francis/Frances or Dyer i'm afraid. |
|||
|
Ann | Report | 2 Apr 2009 15:33 |
Thank you very much Netty |
|||
|
Netty | Report | 2 Apr 2009 15:52 |
Yes Ann, i am looking at images on Ancestry, nothing found on images for Worcester General Infirmary, 1891. Sorry. |
|||
|
Ann | Report | 2 Apr 2009 16:02 |
Thanks very much Netty - appreciate your help |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 2 Apr 2009 19:49 |
it just seemed a bit too much of a coincidence . |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Ann | Report | 2 Apr 2009 23:46 |
Okay Sylvia - thank you. Will see what I can find, but I don't really know where to go next - or do I just file it as a possible? |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 3 Apr 2009 04:02 |
I'd be tempted to file it as probable! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Ann | Report | 3 Apr 2009 15:10 |
Hi Sylvia |
|||
|
Ann | Report | 3 Apr 2009 23:06 |
Hi Sylvia |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 4 Apr 2009 04:30 |
Ann |
|||
Researching: |