Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
HELP ANYONE PLEASE!!!!
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Linda | Report | 7 Feb 2008 22:39 |
I'm at the end of my tether, on the verge of a mental breakdown can anyone throw any light please. |
|||
|
Michelle | Report | 7 Feb 2008 23:02 |
sorry blonde question which newington? |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 7 Feb 2008 23:03 |
Birth registration was not compulsory until 1875.....so you may never find one for Joseph. |
|||
|
Sue in Somerset | Report | 7 Feb 2008 23:05 |
Thinking a bit laterally I went for the birth of baby Charlotte |
|||
|
Sue in Somerset | Report | 7 Feb 2008 23:06 |
According to BMD |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 7 Feb 2008 23:07 |
The marriage certs of any of the children will tell you the name and occupation of the father |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 7 Feb 2008 23:08 |
There is a big gap between Joseph and the next child............ |
|||
|
°o.OOº°‘¨Claire in Wales¨‘°ºOO.o° | Report | 7 Feb 2008 23:09 |
A bit more lateral thinking. I don't like the gap between Joseph & Charles, it's too big so my feeling is they either had different Dad's or no Dad. |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 7 Feb 2008 23:12 |
I've just checked the 1861 image.........Joseph's age is 12...........not 13. |
|||
|
Linda | Report | 7 Feb 2008 23:25 |
Sorry about delay, had to take a phone call. |
|||
|
Sue in Somerset | Report | 7 Feb 2008 23:27 |
Just had a look at the 1871 |
|||
|
°o.OOº°‘¨Claire in Wales¨‘°ºOO.o° | Report | 7 Feb 2008 23:28 |
Was Charlotte born at New Street? |
|||
|
°o.OOº°‘¨Claire in Wales¨‘°ºOO.o° | Report | 7 Feb 2008 23:29 |
Looking back at the 1861, Newington is in the borough of Lambeth |
|||
|
Linda | Report | 7 Feb 2008 23:32 |
Claire, can you tell me what "a base child" is please? |
|||
|
Sue in Somerset | Report | 7 Feb 2008 23:33 |
Is this your Charlotte? |
|||
|
Linda | Report | 7 Feb 2008 23:37 |
I think that is probably the one Sue, the birth date is slightly out but Kernick is not too common and St Peters, Walworth would fit in nicely. |
|||
|
°o.OOº°‘¨Claire in Wales¨‘°ºOO.o° | Report | 7 Feb 2008 23:39 |
A base child is a way of saying that a child is illegitimate. |
|||
|
Sue in Somerset | Report | 7 Feb 2008 23:39 |
If you go to the IGI and put in a search for Kernick in Surrey you get what look like a number of Charlotte's relations. |
|||
|
Linda | Report | 7 Feb 2008 23:44 |
I'm not sure where to go here? I am a decendant of Parsons so if Charlotte Kernick didn't really marry John Parsons just made him up do I follow the Kernick name from here on??? what a mess |
|||
|
Sue in Somerset | Report | 7 Feb 2008 23:45 |
I don't think your Charlotte actually married John Parsons. |