Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Samuel & Sarah Ann (Evans) Hastie 1875 Paisley
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
rootgatherer | Report | 2 Jun 2017 23:11 |
Thank you ArgyllGran and Jude and yes, AustinQ, I think Sarah Ann was a busy lady and perhaps very loving! I just find it sad that Jeanette's Gran seems to be the only child that she "gave away". |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 2 Jun 2017 23:22 |
Here we go! Looks like she had another son! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 2 Jun 2017 23:32 |
How many children are we up to now? We started with Sarah Ann, Thomas and Elizabeth and have added Mary, Priscilla, David, Ellen and William! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 2 Jun 2017 23:46 |
And yet another daughter! Registered under Evans, Hastie and Cross |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Jeanette | Report | 3 Jun 2017 06:10 |
Good morning:) |
|||
|
AustinQ | Report | 3 Jun 2017 08:58 |
I suspect the child Cully on the 1911 census is actually Priscilla. maybe a mistranscription of Cilly- short for Prescilla |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 3 Jun 2017 09:55 |
Yes, Cully will be a mistranscription of some form of Priscilla. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
AustinQ | Report | 3 Jun 2017 10:24 |
It does seem strange that Elizabeth was not on the 1911 with her family. |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 3 Jun 2017 11:23 |
Perhaps Matilda was also adopted and her name was changed, unlike Elizabeth. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
AustinQ | Report | 3 Jun 2017 11:32 |
I think this could be Mary: |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 3 Jun 2017 11:35 |
Yes, I wondered if Matilda had been "adopted" and her name changed. Like you ArgyllGran, Jeanette will be waiting for the release of the 1921 census. Just a shame that the Scottish 1939 register isn't available online like the English one. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 3 Jun 2017 11:37 |
That looks quite hopeful AustinQ :-) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 3 Jun 2017 11:53 |
Just a vague possibility for a child of Mary & John Birnie - absolutely no proof without the birth cert - and we don't know for sure if she's the right Mary: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
AustinQ | Report | 3 Jun 2017 13:15 |
Think this is a possible for Thomas- ending up same location as his sister Priscilla: |
|||
|
AustinQ | Report | 3 Jun 2017 13:47 |
Wondered about this David too: |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 3 Jun 2017 14:45 |
Jeanette will have to invest in certificates to verify or disprove AQ's suggested marriages for Mary and Thomas. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 3 Jun 2017 14:56 |
No, that's not Jeanette's David's death: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Jeanette | Report | 17 Jun 2017 09:00 |
Good morning :) |