Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Karin
|
Report
|
15 May 2015 18:53 |
1871 England, Wales & Scotland Census Household Information Street Barnet Street, West Side Parish Bethnal Green Town London City Hackney County London, Middlesex Country England Ecclesiastical District Enumeration District 12 Municipal Ward North Parliamentary Borough Hackney Registration District Bethnal Green Category Census, Land & Surveys Record set 1871 England, Wales & Scotland Census
Person 1 First Name Mary Last Name Taylor Birth Year 1847 Age 24 Birth Place England Birth Town Bethnal Green Birth County Lancashire Gender Female Relationship To Head of Household Wife
Person 2 First Name William Last Name Taylor Birth Year 1846 Age 25 Birth Place England Birth Town Bethnal Green Birth County Middlesex Gender Male Occupation *****Marine Store Dealer****** Relationship To Head of Household Head Person 3 First Name William Last Name Taylor Birth Year 1868 Age 3 Birth Place England Birth Town Bethnal Green Birth County Middlesex Gender Male Relationship To Head of Household Son
Person 4 First Name Mary Last Name Taylor Birth Year 1871 Age 0 Birth Place England Birth Town Bethnal Green Birth County Middlesex Gender Female Relationship To Head of Household Daughter
Possible marriage of William Taylor to a Mary Duffy (who could become Mary Peake in 1884) Free BMD Surname First name(s) District Vol Page Marriages Jun 1867 DUFFY Mary Bethnal Green 1c 680 DUNLOP Elizabeth Mary Bethnal Green 1c 680 RAMSAY Samuel Bethnal Green 1c 680 RAMSEY Samuel Bethnal Green 1c 680 TAYLOR William Robert Bethnal Green 1c 680
Karin
|
|
KeithG
|
Report
|
15 May 2015 19:04 |
@Jacqueline JHS date of death was 9 January 1954 Margaret was 1 November 1961 These were my grandparents.
|
|
KeithG
|
Report
|
15 May 2015 19:14 |
@Karin I think I see what you're saying: Mary Duffy became Mary Taylor,who then married Thomas Peake who had been widowed. Have I got that right? But then that leaves me still without clear evidence for Margaret's mother. Or am I missing something obvious? Keith
|
|
Jacqueline
|
Report
|
15 May 2015 19:24 |
So the deaths I posted ARE correct.
Which means Margaret DID lie about her age when she married
Once you accept that, everything else falls into place
I know they were your grandparents.........you said as much at the start
|
|
Jacqueline
|
Report
|
15 May 2015 19:28 |
1891 England, Wales & Scotland Census Transcription Virginia Road, Bethnal Green, London, England
First name(s) Last name Relationship Marital status Gender Age Birth year Occupation Birth place Thos Peake Head Married Male 40 1851 Joiner Marine Dealer Hackney, Middlesex, England Transcription Mary Peake Wife Married Female 42 1849 Joiner Marine Dealer Manchester Transcription Margaret Peake Daughter Single Female 6 1885 Scholar Bethnal Green, Middlesex, England Transcription Thos Peake Son Single Male 2 1889 - Bethnal Green, Middlesex, England Transcription William Taylor Stepson Single Male 23 1868 Carpenter Bethnal Green, Middlesex, England Transcription Mary Taylor Stepdaughter Single Female 20 1871 Domestic Bethnal Green, Middlesex, England Transcription Richard Taylor Stepson Single Male 16 1875 Chair Maker Bethnal Green, Middlesex, England
|
|
Jacqueline
|
Report
|
15 May 2015 19:34 |
You can now look yourself for the Taylors in 1881.................FREE on familysearch
|
|
KeithG
|
Report
|
15 May 2015 19:35 |
@Jacqueline I'm not clear how you can say Margaret lied about her age when she married. It's quite possible of course, and to back up your thoughts (?) an informal family tree from another family member shows her birth year as 1885, however I don't understand how we have evidence to choose 1881 or 1885, either have equal probability of being in error as I see it. I have also looked for, and failed to find, a birth for Margaret Peake in 1885. What am I missing? Keith
|
|
Jacqueline
|
Report
|
15 May 2015 19:51 |
You are MISIING the fact that at death her birth year was recorded as 1885
And the birth you can't find is on freebmd and was posted on page one of this thread
|
|
KeithG
|
Report
|
15 May 2015 21:37 |
That's not quite right, Jacqueline, I've had 1885 as an option for several months based on the FreeBMD record and the informal family tree However I saw no reason to prefer the evidence of a death report stating 1885 written some 75 years after the fact, over a marriage certificate written 30 years after the fact. Birth years on death certificates are often based on the stated / assumed / estimated age of the deceased rather than firm evidence. Either date could be in error.
FreeBMD only gives a record of the name and a quarter, there are rather a lot of Margaret Peakes (indeed there is another one adjacent on this same FreeBMD page!). As far as I know, only by ordering a copy of the birth certificate can I confirm the 1885 date. And maybe that's what I have to do.
Here's a census record from 1861:
C1861 probable based on location Name: Thos Peake Age: 10 Estimated Birth Year: 1851 Relation: Son (Child) Father's name: Thomas Peake Mother's name: Margaret Peake Gender: Male Where born: Hackney, Middlesex, England Civil Parish: Hackney St John Ecclesiastical parish: Hackney County/Island: Middlesex Country: England Street address:
Occupation:
Condition as to marriage:
View image Registration district: Hackney Sub-registration district: Hackney ED, institution, or vessel: 4 Neighbors: View others on page Household schedule number: 191 Piece: 157 Folio: 96 Page Number: 40 Household Members: Name Age Thomas Peake 39 Margaret Peake 33 Margaret Peake 11 Thos Peake 10 Maria Peake 9 John Peake 6 Emily Peake 5 William Peake 11/12 Ann Newman 76 Mary Newman 30
Here we have a Margaret Peake aged about 11 in 1861 giving a birth year of around 1850. At this point there would have been no reason to lie about her age. I would therefore expect to be able to find a birth record to match, but this has so far eluded me.
That said, the C1891 you quote provides equal justification for the 1885 date, thank you for that, it's one I have not yet seen - and for this one there is a matching birth record!
Based on the C1891 record it seems that Thomas remarried after his first (?) wife and mother of Margaret died (?). The C1911 record, if it's the same Thomas, has him widowed again.
So now I need a marriage record for Thomas and his first wife, a death record for a female Peake prior to 1911, and a marriage for Thomas and Mary (who had also been married before).
Again, many thanks, this is most helpful.
Keith
|
|
Karin
|
Report
|
16 May 2015 02:56 |
Hi Keith
My suggestion is that Thomas Peake married Mary Duffy/Taylor in 1884 and that Margaret and Thomas Peake Jnr are the children of Thomas and Mary. I don't believe Thomas had any other wife.
Margaret Peake was born in Bethnal Green in 1885 and Thomas Jnr born in Bethnal Green 1889.
Your grandmother Margaret may have "fudged" her age as has been suggested to appear older so as not to have such a huge age gap between her and John. It may also be a simple error on the part of whoever whoever took the information down for the marriage and census'.
Karin
|
|
Karin
|
Report
|
16 May 2015 03:09 |
From FreeBMD A possible death for Mary with the age fitting as she was born approx. 1847 according to census records Deaths Dec 1898 Peake Mary 51 Bethnal G. 1c 106
and Thomas is listed as widower in 1901
Karin
|
|
KeithG
|
Report
|
16 May 2015 07:29 |
Thank you for that summary, Karin, that all fits together.
The conclusion seems to be that there are two families containing similar names: there's the one I found in the C1861 which has a Margaret born 1881 and suggests Thomas married Margaret Newman, and another C1891 found by brummiejan with a Margaret born 1885 which has Thomas marrying Mary Duffy / Taylor.
Both seem possible and consistent. One has "my" Margaret stating her age correctly on the marriage certificate, the other has her fudging it, either also possible. My challenge now is to decide which explanation applies to "my" Margaret.
@Karin @Jacqueline you seem to be convinced that the Mary Duffy / Taylor one is the right one. On what do you base that choice / preference please?
I'm going to keep digging around this in an attempt to make a well-founded choice, if anyone has ideas how best to go about this or comes up with additional evidence I'll be very grateful.
Thank you all for helping think this through.
Keith
|
|
Jacqueline
|
Report
|
16 May 2015 10:30 |
Simply getting the birth cert would resolve it
|
|
KeithG
|
Report
|
16 May 2015 14:29 |
Yes, Jacqueline, and I will order the birth certificate for the one birth we have been able to find, 1885.
That still leaves me with a puzzle with eg this C1901 entry in which both father's and daughter's birth years are slightly out of step:
1901 England, Wales & Scotland Census Household Information Street Virginia Road Parish Bethnal Green Town City County London Country England Ecclesiastical District St Pauls Enumeration District 19 Municipal Ward West Bethnal Green Parliamentary Borough South West Bethnal Green Registration District Bethnal Green Category Census, Land & Surveys Record set 1901 England, Wales & Scotland Census Collections from Great Britain Person 1 First Name Margaret Last Name Peake Birth Year 1884 Age 17 Birth Town Bethnal Green Birth County Middlesex Birth Place England Relationship To Head of Household Daughter Gender Female Occupation Marine Store Assistant Condition Single Archive Reference RG13 Folio 12 Page 16 Piece Number 286 Person 2 First Name Thomas Last Name Peake Birth Year 1849 Age 52 Birth Town Homerton Birth County Middlesex Birth Place England Relationship To Head of Household Head Gender Male Occupation Marine Store Dealer Condition Widower Archive Reference RG13 Folio 12 Page 16 Piece Number 286 Person 3 First Name Thomas Last Name Peake Birth Year 1889 Age 12 Birth Town Bethnal Green Birth County Middlesex Birth Place England Relationship To Head of Household Son Gender Male Occupation Condition Single Archive Reference RG13 Folio 12 Page 16 Piece Number 286
Keith
|
|
ChristinaS
|
Report
|
17 May 2015 10:15 |
Hi Keith, I'm sure the 1901 and 1891 censuses, with Margaret b.1884 and 1885 are the correct ones. They're really the only ones that tie in with Thomas Edward George Peake marrying in 1884.
You've hit a blind spot with the 1861 census. :-) If Margaret was 10 in 1861, she would have been born in 1851- not 1881.
|
|
ChristinaS
|
Report
|
17 May 2015 11:22 |
You mention that your grandmother was a nurse.
Taken from "England's First State Hospitals" In 1892 the minimum age for a nurse was fixed at 22 years old.
I wonder if this is why Margaret added a few years to her age?
|
|
KeithG
|
Report
|
17 May 2015 18:59 |
Thanks for a adding a fresh aspect to this, Christina. I don't know when she became a nurse, I'd always imagined it was war related, but you're right this was pre-war.
And you're right about the 1861 census, a silly error on my part, I spotted it after I'd pressed the button ... .
Keith
|
|
Chris Ho :)
|
Report
|
18 May 2015 07:37 |
England Marriages 1538-1973 Transcription (Find My Past)
First name(s) Thomas Edward George Last name Peake Age 24 Marriage year 1913 Marriage date 22 Mar 1913 Marriage place Canning-Town, Essex, England Father's first name(s) Thomas Edward George Father's last name Peake Spouse's first name(s) Florence Sarah Spouse's last name Naylor Spouse's birth year 1893 Spouse's birth date 1893 Spouse's father's first name(s) Joshua Spouse's father's last name Naylor Residence Canning-Town, Essex, England Place Canning-Town County Essex
(if relating, apologies if already added!)
Chris :)
|
|
KeithG
|
Report
|
18 May 2015 07:58 |
Thanks Chris! I found that too, although your version has more details. I have ordered Thomas the younger's birth certificate too. That way I should have two shots at getting information on Thomas senior. Keith
|
|
Kayak
|
Report
|
20 May 2015 14:11 |
Marriage details:
Place: St Jude's Islington Date: 14th April 1884 Groom: Thomas Edward George Peake, Bachelor, of full age occ: Joiner Bride: Mary Taylor, Widow, of full age (Both living at 32 Lewington Green Road) Groom's father: Deceased Bride's father: Thomas Duffy occ: Umbrella Maker Both bride and groom signed their names Witnesses: John Duffy and Sarah Smith
|