Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Ru
|
Report
|
17 Jan 2014 09:50 |
Hi Chris,
I have the 1855 Birth Certificate. It was one I sent for originally as tried to find T.H. Povey Birth. I discounted it at first until I started this thread. Now I am convinced it is correct.
Will give the details:
Thomas Henry Povey b 12th August 1855 Mill Lane Eton, Bucks Mother Eliza Povey formerly Wildin (note: not G) Father Thomas Povey - I had been told his father was Charles Thomas as on his marriage CErt to Ellen. Fathers Occupation: Carpenter and Builder Ref: Vol 03a Page 321
It really made my day - talk about singing and I cannot sing!!
Chis, sorry to be a bit on the slow side, but how do I download the Navy bit.
Now I am sure I had found the family on 1861 - just going to check get back to you on that.
Sappho
|
|
Chris Ho :)
|
Report
|
17 Jan 2014 09:55 |
http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/SearchUI/Details?uri=D7946082
(just click on above)
Chris :)
Marriages Mar 1851 (>99%) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Povey Thomas Islington 3 210 Wildin Eliza Islington 3 210
Marriage NameThomas Povey (Bachelor. Bookbinder) Spouse Name:Eliza Wildin (Spinster) Record Type:Marriage Event Date:10 Feb 1851 Parish:Islington St Mary Borough:Islington Father Name:Thomas Povey (Farmer) Spouse Father:Henry Wildin (Tailor) Register Type:Parish Register (of full age for both)
1851 (possible) POVEY, Thomas Head Married M 25 1826 Book Edge Gilder St Andrews, London POVEY, Eliza Wife Married F 27 1824 St Andrews, London Piece: 1525 Folio: 43 Page: 12 Registration District: East London Civil Parish: Saint Giles Without Cripplegate Municipal Borough: London Address: 23, New Union Street, Saint Giles Without Cripplegate, London County: Middlesex
|
|
Ru
|
Report
|
17 Jan 2014 10:12 |
Hi Chris,
WOW again what a great find. I shall send for the marriage cert.
Now I do not think I did find the family on 1861 Census. So much detail on family I cannot find it. I have just looked on line again and again I am not seeing it.
Need to refresh so will look in again in the morning.
Have sighted the information on National Archives - many thanks. I think the dates are too close to be different and I agree this is my Thomas Henry. Now I can go back and send for Thomas H and Eliza marriage cert.
I am thrilled - many thanks.
Goodnight - off to bed.
Sappho
|
|
Chris Ho :)
|
Report
|
17 Jan 2014 10:14 |
(have posted details for Marriage!)
Chris :)
|
|
Ru
|
Report
|
21 Jan 2020 16:43 |
Just to let you know that the 1871 Census looks like a typo error has caused a lot of time to be wasted on searching for Thomas Henry Povey birth.
I have been directed to 1871 Census which shows birth of Thomas Henry DOVEY and his family - the spelling now showing incorrect. What a difference a D makes!!
Just wanted to fill you all in.
We get there in the end. Following this one in order to obtain the correct birth certificate.
Thanks as always. Ru
|
|
ArgyllGran
|
Report
|
21 Jan 2020 17:09 |
Just for our reference and interest:
Thomas Dovey in the 1871 England Census Name: Thomas Dovey [Thomas Povey] Age: 15 Estimated birth year: 1856 Relation: Son Gender: Male Where born: LucksEton Civil Parish: Paddington Ecclesiastical parish: St Andrew and St Phillip County/Island: London Country: England Registration district: Kensington Sub-registration district: St Mary Paddington ED, institution, or vessel: 5 Household schedule number: 122 Piece: 3 Folio: 14 Page Number: 22 Household Members: Name Age Charles T Dovey 42 - decorator and gilder Elizh Dovey 28 Thomas Dovey 15 Willie Dovey 12 May Dovey 1
|
|
ArgyllGran
|
Report
|
21 Jan 2020 17:59 |
POVEY, THOMAS HENRY mms WILDIN GRO Reference: 1855 S Quarter in ETON, BUCKS Volume 03A Page 321
[EDIT: already posted ] Marriages Mar 1851 (>99%) Povey Thomas Islington 3 210 Wildin Eliza Islington 3 210
Possible siblings ??
POVEY, ELIZABETH ms WILDIN GRO Reference: 1853 J Quarter in ST LUKE CHELSEA Volume 01A Page 153
POVEY, ELEANOR mms WILDIN GRO Reference: 1860 D Quarter in MARYLEBONE Volume 01A Page 446
POVEY, FANNY mms WILDIN GRO Reference: 1863 J Quarter in KENSINGTON Volume 01A Page 17
Death of Fanny:
POVEY, FANNY 1 GRO Reference: 1864 S Quarter in KENSINGTON Volume 01A Page 10
I don't see births of Willie or May.
|
|
Ru
|
Report
|
22 Jan 2020 20:43 |
Many, many thanks now I must go through and find all those Thomas Henry births and Charles Thomas births, marriages etc. to see what is correct. The Book Binding work indicates a connection as years later this comes back into the family through the work of grandmnother Johannah Povey married to Thomas Charles born 1880 - my grandparents.
Thank you so very much for your help. Must sort out the Wildin and connecting birth certs I sent for and almost discarded when Wildin family could not match up with my research.
Ru
|
|
ArgyllGran
|
Report
|
22 Jan 2020 22:56 |
Just thought - Elizabeth in 1871 is said to be aged 28 - quite clearly on the image. And she was born in Ripon, Yorkshire.
A second wife? She can't be Eliza Wildin who married in 1851, born in London.
I don't see another marriage.
|
|
ArgyllGran
|
Report
|
22 Jan 2020 23:39 |
Re Eleanor Povey, born 1860 - birth posted above:
I can't see her in censuses, but there's this marriage:
Eleanor Povey in the London, England, Church of England Marriages and Banns, 1754-1932 Name: Eleanor Povey Gender: Female Marriage Age: 21 Record Type: Marriage Birth Date: abt 1860 Marriage Date: 11 Dec 1881 Marriage Place: St Michael and All Angels, Ladbroke Grove, Kensington and Chelsea, England Father: Thomas Povey - painter, deceased <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Spouse: John Nicholas Herring
???
Thomas Povey in the England & Wales, Civil Registration Death Index, 1837-1915 Name: Thomas Povey Estimated birth year: abt 1827 Registration Year: 1877 Registration Quarter: Jan-Feb-Mar Age at Death: 50 Registration district: Kensington Inferred County: London Volume: 1a Page: 44
|
|
Ru
|
Report
|
23 Jan 2020 11:08 |
Thank you so much. It seems as though the 1881 Census which shows Thomas Henry Povey was born Brighton Sussex was incorrect and there never was a connection with Brighton or anywhere else in Sussex - why is the mystery which does not deserve scrutiny as the research on that is exhausted.
thank you all for your input it is so appreciated. You never fail to surprise me with the dedication and ability to help others. Thanks so much Ru
|
|
ArgyllGran
|
Report
|
23 Jan 2020 14:50 |
Info on censuses (birthplaces, etc) often has to be taken with a certain pinch of salt and some lateral thinking.
It all depends on how knowledgeable was the person who gave the info to the enumerator, and how accurately he entered what he was told on the form.
|