Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
thomas clegg and alice walton(watson) nee astin?
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Shirley | Report | 10 Jul 2012 22:38 |
have noticed a marriage between alice astin and richard watson in 1878, but she is also known as alice yates, so goodness knows how that fits in if that is indeed her. ? This woman is very confusing . !! Now wondering if richard watson is the brother of thomas watson, esther's second husband? And confused as to the yates surname. Unless yates is the maiden name of maria , george's wife? |
|||
|
Shirley | Report | 10 Jul 2012 23:10 |
Discovered that alice astin first married james yates, then richard watson, then finally thomas clegg in 1885. So solved the mystery thanks to you all. I forgot to mention that alice and thomas were living in 1871 in baxenden, near accrington. Has anyone got the details for that census? |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 10 Jul 2012 23:23 |
Sometimes the fact that the marriage is recorded in 2 names is that the bride's "father" has a different name. |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 10 Jul 2012 23:26 |
.on seconds thoughts .... |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 10 Jul 2012 23:31 |
1881 |
|||
|
Shirley | Report | 10 Jul 2012 23:59 |
thanks mike. think richard died in 1883. not sure about james yates as unsure of his age and found two choices between 1869 and 1878 for his death. has she any children living with her as i am wondering why she left it so late in 1886 to have a child. i think that the alice thomas clegg was living with in 1871 in baxenden was his first wife but i am not sure of her maiden name? |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 11 Jul 2012 00:19 |
Maybe ? |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 11 Jul 2012 00:24 |
Details of above marriage |
|||
|
Shirley | Report | 11 Jul 2012 08:31 |
Hi Mike, no thomas wasnt a collier ever i dont think. more like a labourer or pavior etc . I think too that its more likely to be marsden where he was born and first married, as i think it says on the census he was born in marsden. So more likely to be st james briercliffe or st johns nelson for marriage. or st peters at a push , in burnley. Apart from that, think he was born more around 1840, 1845 ishg from most of the census. Cant remember what his age was on the 1871 census in baxenden. And ive just realised, the alice he was married to then must have been the first alice, wife number one, as he didnt marry alice number two until 1885 . I keep confusing them. :-) |
|||
|
Shirley | Report | 11 Jul 2012 08:31 |
Hi Mike, no thomas wasnt a collier ever i dont think. more like a labourer or pavior etc . I think too that its more likely to be marsden where he was born and first married, as i think it says on the census he was born in marsden. So more likely to be st james briercliffe or st johns nelson for marriage. or st peters at a push , in burnley. Apart from that, think he was born more around 1840, 1845 ishg from most of the census. Cant remember what his age was on the 1871 census in baxenden. And ive just realised, the alice he was married to then must have been the first alice, wife number one, as he didnt marry alice number two until 1885 . I keep confusing them. :-) |
|||
|
Shirley | Report | 11 Jul 2012 12:52 |
When i check the 1871 census i find thomas's profession is a miner when he was in baxenden. So could be that that marriage is correct. But he was born in marsden from most of the census. So not sure why he would be getting married in burnley. I am unable to find him on the 1861 census, and to be honest, not certain i am tracking the correct thomas clegg until i get the marriage certificate of thomas and alice astin for 1885 which is my next step. From that i will hopefully have his dads name which would be a great help. If it is down as thomas, then i will consider that marriage as a good chance of being the one. And i now find that on most of census it does seem that thomas , if its correct thomas, was born around 1837. :-) |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 11 Jul 2012 13:14 |
Another sister of Alice, Mary Ann married Robert Stansfield and Alice is living with them in 1871. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Shirley | Report | 11 Jul 2012 20:28 |
thanks margee. weirdly, i have a feeling i am also connected via stansfields to this family, does it say where robert stansfield is born? i have stansfields on both my mum and dads side of the family. seems all my folk married into the same families. :-) :-) |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 12 Jul 2012 01:55 |
On the 71 census Robert Stansfield was a labourer in cotton mill and was born 1833 in Briercliffe, Lancs. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 12 Jul 2012 02:04 |
This looks like Robert in 1851. Recognize any names? The 83 year old Robert is the father of John, head. They're both widowers. Martha Ridehough is a sister-in-law of John, She's single. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Shirley | Report | 12 Jul 2012 08:15 |
Thanks margee, will check these today . Just a thought, could you tell me what address alice astin/yates is living at in 1871. And where it says she was born? Burnley or briercliffe? |
|||
|
Shirley | Report | 12 Jul 2012 08:15 |
Thanks margee, will check these today . Just a thought, could you tell me what address alice astin/yates is living at in 1871. And where it says she was born? Burnley or briercliffe? |
|||
|
Shirley | Report | 12 Jul 2012 09:01 |
Can anyone spot richard watson on the 1871 census in burnley then? he is married to a jane nee whitaker/whittaker who he married in 1858/59. Think they will be living in the burnley wood area of town. Jane died in 1878 so he must have met or already knew alice as he marrie d her in 1878. That sometimes happened if the dad had young children to take care of. So wondering now if richard and jane had children together which would maybe be shown on the 1871 . :-) |
|||
|
Shirley | Report | 12 Jul 2012 10:06 |
Hi |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 12 Jul 2012 12:37 |
Alice Yates place of birth is on the 1871 census that I posted, Burnley. They were living at 13 Princess St., Habergham Eaves, Burnley. |
|||
Researching: |