Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Hannah Schofield
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
jaded | Report | 21 Jan 2011 13:01 |
Can anyone help me please to find who Hannah Married she was born in Oldham, Lancs, in 1828, to John Schofield, born1791 Thanks |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 21 Jan 2011 13:11 |
She may not have married anyone........... |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 21 Jan 2011 13:17 |
Is this Hannah in 1851? |
|||
|
jaded | Report | 21 Jan 2011 13:17 |
I have been given married to a Willian Shaw, but somene said Travis |
|||
|
jaded | Report | 21 Jan 2011 13:36 |
Hi Flick Sorrow been along time looking at family tree,the only Hadfield is a Mary 1801 but i have not done that side of family |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 21 Jan 2011 13:37 |
There is this marriage but no way of knowing if it is your Hannah. |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 21 Jan 2011 13:39 |
Have a look on freebmd to see if you can find a marriage matching either of the male surnames you have been given. |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 21 Jan 2011 13:41 |
Lancashire Birth indexes for the years: 1850 |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 21 Jan 2011 13:43 |
Is this the family in 1841? |
|||
|
jaded | Report | 21 Jan 2011 13:45 |
Flick Mary is the only Hadfield in my tree dont know if she had ay children, John i was given to me from somone you had the the right Schofields |
|||
|
lancashireAnn | Report | 21 Jan 2011 13:49 |
possibly Hannah's baptism |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 21 Jan 2011 13:50 |
HADFIELD? |
|||
|
jaded | Report | 21 Jan 2011 13:50 |
Mike if i have the right one she had Betty1851 James 1853 TOM 1856 Willian 1859 John 1861 all Shaw |
|||
|
jaded | Report | 21 Jan 2011 13:58 |
fFlick you said Hadfield and i said the only one i have was Mary on my tree |
|||
|
lancashireAnn | Report | 21 Jan 2011 14:06 |
Jaded |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ChristineinPortugal | Report | 21 Jan 2011 14:09 |
Is this the family you are referring to in 1861? |
|||
|
ChristineinPortugal | Report | 21 Jan 2011 14:10 |
This looks like the birth reg for John but it gives MMN as Tanner |
|||
|
lancashireAnn | Report | 21 Jan 2011 14:11 |
is this the connection (still have no tfathomed mary tho |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 21 Jan 2011 14:15 |
You really must read the info provided............ |
|||
|
lancashireAnn | Report | 21 Jan 2011 14:16 |
when you said Shaw I assumed you meant born in district Shaw, Oldham |
|||
Researching: |