Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
help please x
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Flick | Report | 14 Jan 2011 17:52 |
So John was born between 24th Feb 1910 and 23rd Feb 1911, which means that the Dec qtr 1911 birth isn't his, unless the age he declared was not accurate. |
|||
|
Katie | Report | 14 Jan 2011 22:45 |
If John's age is correct on the marriage cert he must have been born by Feb 1911. |
|||
|
Katie | Report | 14 Jan 2011 22:53 |
If the earlier birth is correct then this is the parents' marriage |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 14 Jan 2011 22:54 |
Sorry for the delay. |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 14 Jan 2011 23:05 |
Not sure whether or not this is relevant but I was going through the other numbers in Wear Street in case the Usher family had moved about in the same street (some of my lot did this regularly) and I came across a Fisher family so thought I would give you the details - although I don't think the John there can be the one you are looking for as he is too young:- |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 14 Jan 2011 23:14 |
Isn't that the 1911 that was posted before? |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 14 Jan 2011 23:18 |
Can we get one thing sorted out? |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 14 Jan 2011 23:22 |
This birth looks a better bet.....................IF the age at marriage is accurate |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 14 Jan 2011 23:23 |
Sorry Flick - this 1911 census has been posted before. I was just concentrating on the address rather than the family. Sorry. |
|||
|
Katie | Report | 14 Jan 2011 23:25 |
I agree Flick, he would have known his age at marriage but the person reporting his death might have easily got it wrong. |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 14 Jan 2011 23:29 |
Kath............ |
|||
|
Katie | Report | 15 Jan 2011 00:00 |
Flick, |
|||
|
Christine | Report | 15 Jan 2011 00:25 |
thanks so much for you help so far .. |
|||
|
Christine | Report | 15 Jan 2011 00:27 |
thanks for looking Kathleen |
|||
|
jax | Report | 15 Jan 2011 05:42 |
wonder if these are the witnesses |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
jax | Report | 15 Jan 2011 05:59 |
Births Mar 1914 (>99%) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 15 Jan 2011 09:46 |
Christine |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 15 Jan 2011 09:51 |
This may be totally irrelevant, but there is ONE marriage of John Fisher to Thompson in Sunderland......... |
|||
|
Christine | Report | 15 Jan 2011 18:35 |
aggghhhhh i knew i shouldnt have started !!!!!! im so confused now ...not that it takes much .lol. |
|||
|
jax | Report | 15 Jan 2011 18:38 |
I think Catherine is his sister that is her birth as it matches her death record |
|||
Researching: |