Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
jax
|
Report
|
15 Dec 2010 02:43 |
From the info on the 2005 thread
1911 census - household transcription Person: BEADLE, Leah Address: 36 Huntingdon Street N
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BEADLE, Robert George Head Married M 38 1873 Clerk Kingsland Lecominster Herefordshire VIEW BEADLE, Leah Wife Married F 36 1875 Manchester Lancs VIEW BEADLE, Hector George Harry Son M 10 1901 School Lambeth London VIEW BEADLE, Elsie Adelaida Daughter F 8 1903 St Pancras S London VIEW BEADLE, Sophie Elizabeth Daughter F 7 1904 St Pancras S London VIEW BEADLE, Ida Laura Katherine Daughter F 3 1908 St Pancras S London VIEW
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hello! I am tyring to find anyone in my Anders line who were quite numerous but seem very hard to find! My Nan is Florence Lloyd (nee Anders, b1914) and her parents were Leah Beadle (nee Harris, b1875) and Frederick Albert Anders (b1878). They lived in Islington and he at one time was a ploiceman. Her siblings were Edna Eileen Anders and Katherine Georgina Anders, step siblings were Hector Beadle, Sophia Georgina Beadle, Elsie Adelaide Beadle and Ida Laura Katherine Beadle. However its Fredericks family who are even more interesting! His father was Henry Anders (b1842) and Mary Ann Eliza Carter (b1846). They lived in Chelsea. He was a reporter/journalist though I dont know who/what with and he was a board member of the original Abbey Road (later Abbey national) building society - I have pictures of him thanks to my Mum asking about it one day when she was working at Abbey National (I dont think she had believed my Nan!) Anyway Henry had quite a number of Anders children: Elga, Helen, Henry, Herbert, Agnes, Amy, Frederick, Leonard, Charles and Beatrice dating from 1869 to about 1885
Cannot see any mention of Polly or any name it could be a nickname for which is normally for the name Mary
Then again there was nothing stopping any of the girls calling themselves Polly if they wanted to
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
15 Dec 2010 03:17 |
Well I'm flummoxed. Not seeing a single point of commonality, meself!
|
|
jax
|
Report
|
15 Dec 2010 03:21 |
Your confusing me JC I just got the 1911 census of the lady Frederick Anders got together with does'nt look like they married though. This looks like her husbands death
Deaths Mar 1912 (>99%) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BEADLE Robert G 39 Islington 1b 360
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- tell a lie here it is
Marriages Jun 1915 (>99%) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Anders Frederick A Beadle Islington 1b 983 Beadle Leah Anders Islington 1b 983
Just looking for Polly !!!
jax
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
15 Dec 2010 03:27 |
I'm confusing myself, I fear. I'm too underslept to figure out the connections here, but I'm sure they're there. ;)
|
|
jax
|
Report
|
15 Dec 2010 03:32 |
The only connection is that Rachel's gt grandparents both married twice, must have been a divorce in there somewhere then?? and we are looking for a Polly aswell....which I cant find
jax
|
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link!
|
Report
|
15 Dec 2010 05:53 |
According to William's army records, Rose Julia was born 28/11/1912 and Adelaide was divorced when he married her.
Rose
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
15 Dec 2010 15:19 |
Well there's a bit of news!
So this is the marriage in question:
Marriages Sep 1898 Anders Frederick Albert Paddington 1a 112 Wilson Adelaide Mary Paddington 1a 112
and the divorce --
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Just put
frederick anders divorce
in the quick search box in the upper right. This direct link should work:
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/catalogue/displaycataloguedetails.asp?CATLN=7&CATID=-3094409&j=1#summary
Court for Divorce and Matrimonial Causes, later Su... J 77/1159/5197
Divorce Court File: 5197. Appellant: Frederick Albert Anders. Respondent: Adelaide Mary Anders. Co-respondent: William Desmond. Type: Husband's petition for divorce [hd]. . Divorce Court File: 5197. Date: 1914
Followed by:
Marriages Jun 1915 Anders Adelaide M Di[as]mon Islington 1b 848 Dismon William Anders Islington 1b 848 Dismon William Wilson Islington 1b 848 Wilson Adelaide M Dismon Islington 1b 848
and
Births Mar 1913 Dismon Rose J Wilson Bethnal G. 1c 216 (double registered - I forgot to remember to look)
Births Jun 1920 Dismon Dorothy _ Wilson Rochford 4a 1562
Births Jun 1922 Dismon William T Wilson Islington 1b 373
And of course the marriage jax posted (I've had some sleep now!) --
Marriages Jun 1915 Anders Frederick A Beadle Islington 1b 983 Beadle Leah Anders Islington 1b 983
which was followed by these births:
Births Mar 1915 Anders Florence B Harris Islington 1b 442
Births Jun 1916 Anders Edna E Harris Islington 1b 446
Births Sep 1919 Anders Kathleen G Harris Islington 1b 372
because Leah was previously married:
Marriages Mar 1897 Beadle Robert George Strand 1b 754 Harris Leah Strand 1b 754
Rachel has the three Dismon children in her tree here at GR.
Someone else -- not the person who posted that earlier thread -- has one of them: Dorothy Dismon.
The person who posted that thread and one other person have Florence Anders in their trees. Someone has an Edna Anders 1917 London, who has to be the same one (there is a Q1 1918 Edna Anders, but in Lancashire). And three people (one of whom has Edna 1917) have Kathleen Anders 1919 in their trees (again, one says 1916, but it has to be the same one).
|
|
Rachel
|
Report
|
15 Dec 2010 16:08 |
Hi guys, I've jus had a quick scan of all this as I'm work and I want to thank you all so much for all the help! I'm going to speak to my Mother later and go through all this info properly.
The divorce info is great as this was something we had no idea how to obtain so that's a real turn out.
Cheers!
|
|
Rachel
|
Report
|
15 Dec 2010 20:06 |
Right managed to look over everything and it's all starting to fit into place so I've updated my tree on here.
I have a question about the 1871 Census that Rose found :
1871 England Census about John E Wilson Name: John E Wilson Age: 44 Estimated birth year: abt 1827 Relation: Head Spouse's name: Mary A Wilson Gender: Male Where born: Bristol, Gloucestershire, England Civil Parish: St Anne Soho Ecclesiastical parish: St Anne County/Island: London Country: England Registration district: Westminster Sub-registration district: St Anne Soho ED, institution, or vessel: 9 Household schedule number: 213 Household Members: Name Age John E Wilson 44 Mary A Wilson 33 Sarah A Wilson 15 Edward J Wilson 4 George A Wilson 2 Elizabeth Wilson 2 Months
I see there is a Sarah Wilson listed age 15 - would she have been another daughter of John and Mary? Also would there be any ay of locating their marriage so I can look for a maiden name?
Cheers
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
15 Dec 2010 20:15 |
For the marriage, search at FreeBMD for a marriage
wilson john e [no surname] mary a
around the right time.
You're fortunate to have the middle initials. FreeBMD will match them with any names that start with them, for example (hypothetically), John Edward and Mary Ann.
http://freebmd.rootsweb.com/cgi/search.pl
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
15 Dec 2010 20:18 |
The only likely one I see is in Alverstoke 1865 -- which would work if John was in the military maybe.
I haven't checked the 1871 to see the various people's places of birth. The place of birth for the eldest child might be a guide to where they might have married.
|
|
jax
|
Report
|
15 Dec 2010 20:33 |
same census it is Broadstairs in Kent 1871 census - household transcription Person: WILSON, John E Address: St Ann Court, St Anne Soho, Westminster
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WILSON, John E Head M 44 1827 Gloucestershire VIEW >>>labourer civil service WILSON, Mary A Wife F 33 1838 Kent VIEW WILSON, Sarah A Daughter F 15 1856 Kent VIEW WILSON, Edward J Son M 4 1867 Middlesex VIEW WILSON, George A Son M 2 1869 Middlesex VIEW WILSON, Elizabeth Daughter F 0 1871 Middlesex VIEW Although it says she is 15 that is a big gap between children so maybe she was really 5 ?? also says she is a scholar which was unusual for that age back then
|
|
Rachel
|
Report
|
15 Dec 2010 21:02 |
Yeah I though the gap as quite big, so if she was 5 her birth would be in 1868, I'll have a look for a birth.
Also on the John Wilson marriage front I also found that marriage on FreeBMD at Alverstoke - married to a Mary Ann Miller in December 1865. I think I'll have to get Adelaide's birth certificate to clarify.
|
|
jax
|
Report
|
15 Dec 2010 21:07 |
That would be your best move Rachel to get Adelaides birth cert. Sarah would have been born 1866 which would fit in nicely with that marriage
jax
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
15 Dec 2010 21:14 |
In 1871, Sarah is definitely shown as 15.
What's interesting is that she and Mary A, mother, are the two born in Broadstairs -- husband John born in Bristol, younger children born in Whitechapel and Soho.
I'd say that Sarah was a daughter of Mary Ann's before the marriage to Wilson. (Or possibly of John's, but it was more common for a woman to bring children to a marriage.)
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
15 Dec 2010 21:17 |
1861
Name: Mary A Miller Age: 21 Estimated birth year: abt 1840 Relation: Servant > Where born: Broadstairs, Kent, England Civil Parish: Thanet St Peter
Births Jun 1856 ? MILLER Sarah Ann Thanet 2a 583
|
|
Rachel
|
Report
|
15 Dec 2010 21:20 |
hmm that's a interesting theory if she had her before the marriage to John, would she be listed as daughter if the relationship refers to that beteen them and the head of the family?
|
|
jax
|
Report
|
15 Dec 2010 21:21 |
But would'nt you think she would have been working at 15 Janey? not that I'm doubting your logic
jax
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
15 Dec 2010 21:22 |
Yes, absolutely. If the husband embraced the child into the household (contrary to what my gr-grfather did with my gr-aunt in the 1890s), the child would be known by his surname and reported as his child in the censuses, and possibly even marry under his surname.
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
15 Dec 2010 21:24 |
It's just a theory! But it does say 15 very clearly on the 1871 census image, and the spouses were of a bit of an advanced age if they married in 1865, and her place of birth is different from the other children's, and so on.
|