Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
KiwiJoy
|
Report
|
29 May 2010 08:00 |
I have been looking for a while now trying to find Mary Vevers, parents William and Margaret,(nee Little). On the 1911 Census Mary is10yrs old, born in Newcastle upon Tyne. I have searched all the births from 1896 to 1906, to be on the safe side, but I cannot find a Mary Vevers anywhere - and I've tried variations of the Surname. I have just been on Free BMD and I have found a Margaret Annie Vevers born 1903 in Newcastle upon Tyne. Now given that her mothers name is Margaret do you think this could be my 'Mary". I would send for the cert. but it's a costly exercise, plus a 3 week wait for the cert to arrive. Would there be any other way for me to check if this is "My Mary"? I'd be grateful if anyone can point me in the right direction to verify my info.
Regards
Joy
|
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it
|
Report
|
29 May 2010 08:06 |
But if she was 10 on the 1911 census she cant have been born in 1903, Have you found her parents marriage .is it possible she was born pre the marriage so would be under mums maiden name?
|
|
Gee
|
Report
|
29 May 2010 08:10 |
This looks like apossible for her parents marriage?
Marriages Sep 1896 (>99%) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cook Elizabeth Newcastle T. 10b 61 Dodds Luke Newcastle T 10b 61 LITTLE Margaret Newcastle T. 10b 61 Vevrs William Newcastle T. 10b 61
|
|
Gee
|
Report
|
29 May 2010 08:23 |
No, nothing is coming up. Is it possible that she was an adopted child?
Do you have Margaret and William on 1901....and their ages please
|
|
Gee
|
Report
|
29 May 2010 08:29 |
HOUSEHOLD VEVERS WILLIAM M 1853 58 Newcastle upon Tyne Northumberland
HOUSEHOLD VEVERS MARY F 1901 10 Newcastle upon Tyne Northumberland
Is this Mary and her father? I cant find a Margaret about the right age?
I dont have full access to the 1911, could you post it please
The Margaret Annie that you mention is a different person as she shows up on the 1911 age 9...so dont waste your money on that certificate
x
|
|
Irene
|
Report
|
29 May 2010 08:34 |
Mary Harrington 1899 Carlisle Mary H Vivers married Carlise 1911 there is an entry on FreeBMD for a Mary E getting married but a correction states it is Mary H. Irene
|
|
Gee
|
Report
|
29 May 2010 08:36 |
I dismissed these earlier due to the age of Margaret and William
1901 England Census about William Vevers Name: William Vevers Age: 49 Estimated birth year: abt 1852 Relation: Head Spouse's name: Margaret Gender: Male Where born: Cumberland, England Civil parish: St Andrew Ecclesiastical parish: St Luke County/Island: Northumberland Country: England Street Address:<<27 Sheraton St
Occupation: Bricklayer
Condition as to marriage:
Education:
Registration district: Newcastle upon Tyne Sub-registration district: St Andrew ED, institution, or vessel: 1 Neighbors: View others on page Household schedule number: 73 Household Members: Name Age William Vevers 49 Margaret Vevers 44 <<Scotland James Vevers 20 <<<Newcastle Margaret would have been old to be having children in 1901, although not impossible I know
However they have a son age 20....it is possible he had a child out of marriage and this could be Mary?
can you give us some feedback please
x
|
|
Gee
|
Report
|
29 May 2010 08:43 |
Births Mar 1902 (>99%) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lee Mary Jane Newcastle T. 10b 39
Marriages Dec 1901 (>99%) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lee Mary Ethel Newcastle T. 10b 216 VEVERS James Toward Newcastle T 10b 216
Wonder if this is the birth and these are the parents? Marys birth is registered in the first quarter of 1902 but she could have been born late 1901
x
|
|
Dea
|
Report
|
29 May 2010 08:46 |
1911:
VEVERS, William Head Married M 58 1853 Bricklayer Cumberland Carlisle VEVERS, Marget Wife Married 15 years F 54 1857 Scotland Canon Tre Resident VEVERS, Mary Daughter F 10 1901 School Northumberland N C
Address: 27 Sheraton St Spital Tongues Newcastle on Tyne County: Northumberland
Two thoughts spring up here:
Thhe mother is Scotish - could she have gone up there to have the baby, or soon after, and registered her there?
Given the ages of the parents, the fact they have been married for 15 years and there is only one child, maybe she was 'adopted' ?
Dea x
|
|
Gee
|
Report
|
29 May 2010 08:52 |
Thanks Dea for posting the 1911.
The son James was born in Newcastle so it looks like they were in that region for some time and I would have thought Mary would have been born there too
It's looking more like an adoption, maybe even James daughter
But a Scotland birth cant be ruled out
Edit; Dea, they had a 20 year old son in 1901
I wonder if Margaret was a second marriage for William? x
|
|
Dea
|
Report
|
29 May 2010 09:01 |
The Margaret Annie cert is a 'grand-daughter'
She is the child of son James + Mary Ethel Lee.
Dea x
|
|
Gee
|
Report
|
29 May 2010 09:16 |
I thought so. This looks like William and his first wife. The marrige I posted earlier for him and Margaret does look like a second marriage
1881 England Census about William Vevers Name: William Vevers Age: 30 Estimated birth year: abt 1851 Relation: Head Spouse's name: Bridget Gender: Male Where born: Carlisle, Cumberland, England Civil parish: Westgate County/Island: Northumberland Country: England Street Address: 19 Waterloo St Condition as to marriage: Married Education:
Employment status: View image Occupation: Bricklayer Registration district: Newcastle Upon Tyne Sub-registration district: Westgate ED, institution, or vessel: 14a Neighbors: View others on page Household Members: Name Age William Vevers 30 Bridget Vevers 28 Mary E. Vevers 9 Margaret A. Vevers 5 John Vevers 4 William Vevers 2 Dea, the Margaret Annie birth could well be a second child for James and Mary Ethel Lee
x
|
|
KiwiJoy
|
Report
|
29 May 2010 09:32 |
Hi Shirley, I had thought of the age being different, but on some of the Census I have for my tree, the ages have been out a year or two, so thought that may have been the case here?
Thanks.
Joy
|
|
Gee
|
Report
|
29 May 2010 09:35 |
Joy
What about all the info that has been searched and suggested?
|
|
KiwiJoy
|
Report
|
29 May 2010 10:11 |
Hi Ginny
Yes you have the correct marriage for William and Margaret. I have a copy of their Wedding Cert. Married 15 August 1896. William was 43 and Margaret was 40. It was Williams 2nd Marriage
I was going to send you the details of the 1911 Census but i see Dea has beating me to it.
The James Vevers you mention is actually my Grandfather, He's Williams son from Williams first marriage to Bridget (nee Tarpey), which you found beforeI had a chance to write back to you. ( And I can't find Bridget's death either...)
James Toward Vevers and Mary Ethel Lee are my Grandparents and now that you have worked out that Margaret Annie was their child, I feel such a fool although she went by the name of Peggy and that's why It didn't click.
Why would it be then that nobody can find her birth. Wouldn't she have had to be registered? I can't find her on Genes and I can't find her on Free BMD. Is there anywhere else I could try?
Thanks ever so much for all your help I really appreciate it. Just a pity I had the wrong person!
Joy :-)
|
|
Gee
|
Report
|
29 May 2010 10:18 |
Joy
Have a read at the suggestions that Mary was not born a 'Vevers' but possibly a 'Lee'
I think that 'Peggy' and 'Mary' are very likley to be sisters, but you need the birth certificate to check that James and Mary Ethel are the parents
|
|
KiwiJoy
|
Report
|
29 May 2010 10:18 |
Hi Dea
Thanks for your input to my problem It's such a shame after the work you and Ginny put into my query that Mary's birth is still a mystery. This Vevers branch of mine is causing me all sorts of problems at every step. I'm surprised I have any hair left !
Thanks for your help it was very much appreciated.
Joy :-)
|
|
KiwiJoy
|
Report
|
29 May 2010 10:38 |
Hi Ginny
I definitely have all my Mam's brothers and sisters accounted for, including the first child James, who died the same year he was born in 1904. If Mary was the first child of James and Mary Ethel, why would they give her away to her Grandfather? It seems a strange thing to do? I've checked all the births from 1896 to1906 and not found a Mary Vevers to either William and Margaret or James and Mary. Have you any suggestions as to where I could look next? If she was born in Scotland why would they put Northumberland on the Census? I might have a look and see if I can see a Margaret Little somewhere before she got married, maybe she has a family in Northumberland too. I'm getting desperate now!!
Thanks again Ginny for your help I truly appreciate it..
Joy :-)
|
|
Gee
|
Report
|
29 May 2010 10:50 |
Joy my advice remains the same. Get the certificate for Mary Jane Lee
Births Mar 1902 (>99%) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lee Mary Jane Newcastle T. 10b 39
Theres a whole host of reasons why Mary might have brought up with her grandparents...how many children thought their grandparents were their parents....too many to mention here me thinks
I think if you get the certificate you may well find the mother is Mary Ethel Lee
I'm afraid it's down to you now
x
|
|
Dea
|
Report
|
29 May 2010 10:53 |
I really don't think that Mary 'belongs' to James + Mary Ethel.
They show on 1911 as having had 4 children and all of them are there with them.
VEVERS, James Toward Head Single M 29 1882 Labourer Newcastle on Tyne VEVERS, Mary Ethel Wife Married 10 years F 28 1883 Lead Gate Durham VEVERS, Margaret Annie Daughter Single F 9 1902 Benwell Newcastle upon Tyne VEVERS, Walter Son Single M 6 1905 Benwell Newcastle upon Tyne VEVERS, William Son Single M 4 1907 Benwell Newcastle upon Tyne VEVERS, Maud Daughter Single F 2 1909 Benwell Newcastle upon Tyne
Address: 27 Elm St Fenham Newcastle-Upon-Tyne County: Northumberland 'IF' Mary is the daughter of James, I am sure the mother must have been someone other than the lady he married. ?
Only that cert will tell you though!
Dea x
|