Find Ancestors

my mistake must stop that of course no certs till when you say i should know that from the times ive ordered them
i will ask lesley on here to confirm her details
thank you
i got that birth year from exrtracted details {the reiiable one}
on family search
i will leave this thread open for a while then delete as i wish to ask lesley for some details
thank you to all that replied to this thread

Both of the Phoebes are on the IGI - with parents John & Elizabeth in the same batch

Are you sure the first one didn't die?

Partridge, British Isles
Father: John , Mother: Elizabeth
Exact Spelling: Off
Batch Number: C051991

1. MARIANNE PARTRIDGE - International Genealogical Index
Gender: Female Christening: 25 MAY 1821 Seaton And Beer, Devon, England

2. JACOB PARTRIDGE - International Genealogical Index
Gender: Male Christening: 05 DEC 1813 Seaton And Beer, Devon, England

3. PHOEBE PARTRIDGE - International Genealogical Index
Gender: Female Christening: 23 JAN 1803 Seaton And Beer, Devon, England

4. PHOEBY PARTRIDGE - International Genealogical Index
Gender: Female Christening: 08 FEB 1818 Seaton And Beer, Devon, England

5. JOHN PARTRIDGE - International Genealogical Index
Gender: Male Christening: 04 NOV 1810 Seaton And Beer, Devon, England

6. ELIZABETH PARTRIDGE - International Genealogical Index
Gender: Female Christening: 26 MAY 1805 Seaton And Beer, Devon, England

7. WILLIAM PARTRIDGE - International Genealogical Index
Gender: Male Christening: 21 DEC 1800 Seaton And Beer, Devon, England
DEATH 14 Feb 1802

8. WILLIAM PARTRIDGE - International Genealogical Index
Gender: Male Christening: 13 DEC 1807 Seaton And Beer, Devon, England

JOHN PARTRIDGE

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marriages:
Spouse: ELIZABETH PAVEY
Marriage: 13 JUL 1800 Seaton And Beer, Devon, England

freewheel
thank you for that
do you know its poss the first phoebe died they have 2 sons both william william 1800 died 1802
so the phoebe that is married to samuel miller could be the 2nd phoebe
thank you for your efforts

ye gads David don't wait until there are two pages of replies to say look over here, lol

for info a previous thread that may explain some

http://www.genesreunited.com.au/boards.asp?wci=thread&tk=1195256

although I have not figured out where Phoebe whatever her name is comes into this yet

I may not get a chance to play Partridges today so I will just tag this into 'my threads' and have a look later.

ok thank you

tried that web address came up invalid board /thread
never mind thanks anyway

That's just for others reading David it's the one where I dredged up every Partridge ... I guess I should say flushed out every Partridge hahaha ... in that part of Devon. Well..... obviously not I guess.

I use the Australian Genes site, maybe I should put the UK web addresses for things

http://www.genesreunited.co.uk/boards.asp?wci=thread&tk=1195256

but ....... I suspect you just copied it wrong, wink.

And David do not delete threads unless you wish your friends here to turn into an angry mob. What is it that you're going to ask Lesley? Why not just ask here since there are lots of people who all have access to the same databases and records and asking someone else outside of the thread where the discussion is happening just isn't quite kosher since they are in the dark about all the rest of it.

Freewheel does have it, this is the Phoebe who married Miller

4. PHOEBY PARTRIDGE - International Genealogical Index
Gender: Female Christening: 08 FEB 1818 Seaton And Beer, Devon, England

and it is possible that the parents are the same John and Elizabeth and did have a replacement Phoebe. But the place is crawling with Partridges and they could be two different couples a generation apart.

What is the connection between Phoebe 1803 and Eliza Partridge whosit or Elizabeth (Turner?) Chappel?


1851 probably the John who married Elizabeth Pavey

Name: John Partridge
Age: 75
Estimated birth year: abt 1776
Relation: Visitor
Gender: Male
Where born: Beer, Devon, England
Civil parish: Seaton and Beer
County/Island: Devon
Abraham Ward 31
Anna Ward 30
Thomas Ward 10
John Partridge 75

He's alone in 1841 and there is no other John or any Elizabeth in/born in Seaton either year so that one set of parents two Phoebes theory seems reasonable.

the reason i said i was going to delete was i was intending to ask lesley about partridges on her thread and i know you cant have 2 threads on the same subjects thats why but i wont bother
i will be asking her to search for a cousin of mine next
i dont intentionally annoy or offend members and hope they dont me
will ask lesley a question now but not on this subject so will be ok without offending anyone

Sorry David I don't have a clue what Lesley's thread is and why you want to ask her about Partridges, still.

lesley has a popular thread on here bmd 1916 -2005 she helped me to trace details of a cousins marriage
i have now asked her to trace poss death & marr of another cousin
i have not asked her to trace partridges

Okay, well I've never been a fan of lookup threads. To me it makes far more sense if a whole bunch of people pool their resources and talents and put their heads together and sift through something. There just isn't anything magical about a lookup thread and by posting in one, one just ensures that nobody else will see a question, because nobody else reads those threads, and that could mean missing out on valuable ideas. Trying to sort out who married whom and who were whose parents isn't a 'lookup' and from what I've seen there's a whole lot of 'lookup' requests go on that are just people who haven't succeeded in finding the unfindable in their own threads so off they trot to dump it on three or four lookup people none of whom know anybody else has touched it ........ fine, rant over. I'll just walk off scratching my head now! But yeah, for straightforward 'what children did joe blow and rachel roe who married in london in 1952 have' questions, that's a lookup, makes sense.

ok

By the way and just for future reference, deleting a thread and then starting a new one and/or heading off to a lookup thread is not the way to get around the no multiple threads rule, not not not. It does very plainly break the rule whichi is about _posting_ threads not _having_ threads and it is completely unfair to anyone who has worked in the thread and to anyone who doesn't see it and then can't see it when the thing pops up again.

thats correct

on the 1851 census that freewheel found for me its got samuel miller 63 fanny miller 62
phoebe miller 33
is this phoebes father & mother in law
what age is samuel phoebies husband please ??

ive found the details on family search {extracted } yes they are phoebies father & mother in law
phoebies husband was bap nov 30th 1817
lve found the death for phoebe 1886
cant find a death for samuel miller as yet