Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Constance May Warnham b.1893 no birth certificate
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Johnnyblueeyes | Report | 2 May 2009 08:32 |
Looking for Birth information on Constance May Warnham.My grandmother |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
June | Report | 2 May 2009 08:42 |
looks like she was mistranscribed |
|||
|
Johnnyblueeyes | Report | 2 May 2009 08:55 |
Thanks June, |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Johnnyblueeyes | Report | 4 May 2009 22:52 |
nudge |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Johnnyblueeyes | Report | 4 May 2009 23:08 |
It's not Constance May Worman, |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Choccy | Report | 4 May 2009 23:16 |
Have you tried this one - |
|||
|
Johnnyblueeyes | Report | 4 May 2009 23:19 |
Thanks Wilma, |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Johnnyblueeyes | Report | 4 May 2009 23:38 |
Good night all i'm of to my bed. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Netty | Report | 4 May 2009 23:49 |
Hi, i've searched the images quarter by quarter 1893 and the first quarter 1894, the printing is very bad, the ink is so heavy on some pages that it's impossible to read some entries. there's a very good chance that the birth has been mistranscribed. Forename & Surname. |
|||
|
June | Report | 5 May 2009 11:07 |
lets track them back |
|||
|
Johnnyblueeyes | Report | 5 May 2009 11:22 |
Thanks for looking Netty. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Johnnyblueeyes | Report | 5 May 2009 11:27 |
Thanks June ,for the great effort you made in helping me in my quest. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Johnnyblueeyes | Report | 14 May 2009 14:19 |
STILL LOOKING |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Choccy | Report | 14 May 2009 15:29 |
Looking at the 1901 census again, do you think Constance could have been a niece of the boarder 'Jane Kitcheny' and not the Bridgmans, as she appears under the name of the boarder? |
|||
|
sablon | Report | 14 May 2009 15:39 |
FOR REF |
|||
|
Gritty | Report | 14 May 2009 15:49 |
What a toughie!! |
|||
|
sablon | Report | 14 May 2009 16:12 |
Marriages Sep 1884 (>99%) |
|||
|
lancashireAnn | Report | 14 May 2009 16:22 |
just a thought - if the 1901 census is correct it is likely she was born in 1892 not 1893. How old was she on the marriage certificate - death certificates are often unreliable for dates of birth as they are only as good as the informant thinks. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
sablon | Report | 14 May 2009 16:29 |
i have put in constance warnham without a birth date on free bdm and nothing comes up. |
|||
|
lancashireAnn | Report | 14 May 2009 16:29 |
doesn't really fit any info other than as a niece of Walter but..... |
|||
Researching: |