Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
death at sea- sorted thanks!
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
:) still smiling :) | Report | 1 May 2008 12:46 |
hi all, |
|||
|
:) still smiling :) | Report | 1 May 2008 13:14 |
sorry the children's names were Harry 1886, beatrice and violet (c.1890) Sydney 1891 and Frank R 1895. if this helps at all. i also know from his mc to emily that he was a widower but cannot find his first marriage with a death of the wife before 1885. thanks, |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 1 May 2008 13:22 |
Leanne, |
|||
|
:) still smiling :) | Report | 1 May 2008 13:25 |
she dies in 1897 aged 38. on the certificate she is stated as "wife of Charles Gannaway- a beer house keeper" first mention of a beer house, on sydneys bc he is down as ship steward. in 1901 children are all split up in census. frank and syd in southampton with mary gannaway who is stated as mother , but i think its them due to ges pob and we beleive charles remarried after emily. harry is an apprenticed jeweler in lambeth. beatrice is down as Beattie ganaway in a girls home and vi is in surbiton with her mothers sister who is louisa burton. |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 1 May 2008 13:25 |
Births Sep 1850 |
|||
|
:) still smiling :) | Report | 1 May 2008 13:26 |
thanks soph, |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 1 May 2008 13:27 |
This is the first marriage i can find.... but these 2 may not have actually married each other, there are 2 people missing off the 'group' |
|||
|
:) still smiling :) | Report | 1 May 2008 13:30 |
yes i had thought that perhaps they married but there are a couple of censi later where my charles is missing that he appears with amelia but i checked a death for her and she died 1898. i have looked at marriages for him but none of them that i have found looks like they died before he remarried i suppose it could have been a bigamous marriage though. |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 1 May 2008 13:32 |
1851 England Census |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 1 May 2008 13:33 |
well his other marriage is in london..... perhaps he thought he wouldn't get caught and it was worth the risk? |
|||
|
:) still smiling :) | Report | 1 May 2008 13:35 |
yes i thought it did seem probable, but there are a couple of census' available for amelia and charles but they appear to change ages. first one has charles as 22 which would fit and sencond has him as 42. i have been going round and round in circles on this for a while! thanks to you both. |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 1 May 2008 13:36 |
.....and Amelia is twice his age in 1871??? |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 1 May 2008 13:38 |
looking at the image again it could well be he's 32.... which would make his YOB as 1840? lol |
|||
|
:) still smiling :) | Report | 1 May 2008 13:39 |
hmm, he's a toughy.it's with him that the family move to london. i have them back to 1700 in southampton according to IGI i still need to check it but i am in contact with a couple of people who can help to corroborate that. maybe he thought london and southampton were far enough apart that they would never know. and then all of his children are apart in 1901 and according to my grandfather (sydney's son) the children then went to stay with their new stepmother who he thinks was possibly spanish which i thought would make sense if he was a ship steward. but i can't find a marriage afterwards either. |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 1 May 2008 13:40 |
I think this could well be your Charles??? |
|||
|
:) still smiling :) | Report | 1 May 2008 13:40 |
oh dear it's making my head hurt! |
|||
|
:) still smiling :) | Report | 1 May 2008 13:41 |
i'm not sure, i think the 1850 one is more likely. on his marriage to emily c plummer his age is 35 whish would make sense for an 1850 birth. |
|||
|
:) still smiling :) | Report | 1 May 2008 13:42 |
perhaps the one that married amelia was different. he could be the one born 1839 and mine could be the one born 1850? |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 1 May 2008 13:43 |
How old was Emily? |
|||
|
:) still smiling :) | Report | 1 May 2008 13:44 |
she was 38 when she died in 1897 so that would make her born 1859. he could have done i suppose but then why not say he was the same age? |