Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Kim
|
Report
|
28 Apr 2008 21:49 |
my life, i cant take it all in, Bless all of you so much, i have not found a bean and looked till cuckoo, and you beautiful people have accomplished all of this, many many thanks to you all, but what a scandel!! i will have to read it all a few times to take it in, bless you xxxx
|
|
Battenburg
|
Report
|
28 Apr 2008 09:24 |
1891 census. Alice Kember 1879 Kensington scholar at Kensington and Chelsea district school and cottage homes.
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
28 Apr 2008 06:45 |
One more bit ... looks like John in 1891:
Name: John Kimber Age: 28 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1863 Relation: Head Gender: Male Where born: Marylebone, London, England Civil Parish: St Marylebone Ecclesiastical parish: St Matthew Friday Street County/Island: London Country: England
Occupation: Decorator Condition as to marriage: Single Registration district: Marylebone Sub registration district: St John ED, institution, or vessel: 2
George Kimber 32 -- it says 25, if you ask me John Kimber 28
William Boswell was a painter in 1901. Could have been some connection.
That John and George in 1871:
Name: John Kimber Age: 11 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1860 Relation: Son Father's Name: James Mother's Name: Anne Gender: Male Where born: Marylebone, Middlesex, England Civil Parish: St Marylebone Ecclesiastical parish: St Mary County/Island: London Country: England
Registration district: Marylebone Sub registration district: St Mary ED, institution, or vessel: 15 Household schedule number: 268
Mary Kidd 76 Anne Kimber 40 Annie Kimber 12 >> George Kimber 7 James Kimber 56 James Kimber 13 >> John Kimber 11 Mary A Kimber 5 William Kimber 9
Name: John Kimber Year of Registration: 1860 Quarter of Registration: Jan-Feb-Mar District: Marylebone (1837-1901) County: London, Middlesex Volume: 1a Page: 405
Can't see a death for John before that Sarah-William marriage, but also can't see him in 1901.
I wonder:
KIMBER Annie 1861 F 1906 Glasgow Canada Quebec KIMBER John 1861 M 1906 Glasgow Canada Quebec
Wandering off into wild hypothesis -- 1901:
Name: John Kember Age: 40 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1861 Relationship: Son-in-law Spouse's name : Janet Gender: Male Where born: England Registration Number: 685/2 Registration district: St Andrew Civil Parish: Edinburgh St Mary County: Midlothian Address: 10a Union St Occupation: General Labourer ED: 92 Household schedule number: 94 Line: 17 Roll: CSSCT1901_375
David Kember 6 Janet Kember 33 John Kember 40 * Alfred McMillan 14 Isabella McMillan 72
* Name: Alfred McMillan Age: 14 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1887 Relationship: Grandson Father's Name: John Mother's Name: Janet
But now I really have to quit!
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
28 Apr 2008 06:15 |
And 1881:
Name: Sarah Kember Age: 20 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1861 Relation: Wife Spouse's Name: John Gender: Female Where born: Strand, Middlesex, England
-- it actually says "ditto, Stroud", if you ask me
Name: John Kember Age: 20 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1861 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Sarah Gender: Male Where born: St Marylebone, Middlesex, England Occupation: Gas Fitter
Name: Alice M.F. Kember Age: 2 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1879 Relation: Daughter Father's Name: John Mother's Name: Sarah Gender: Female Where born: Hammersmith, Middlesex, England Civil Parish: Harmmersmith County/Island: London Country: England Street address: Gayford Rd 27 Hawthorne Terr Condition as to marriage: Married Registration district: Fulham Sub registration district: St Paul Hammersmith ED, institution, or vessel: 33
Alice M.F. Kember 2 John Kember 20 Sarah Kember 20
And another GR mystery bites the dust!!
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
28 Apr 2008 06:09 |
Oh look --
Marriages Sep 1878 Edwards Ann Chelsea 1a 530 HULKES Edward Chelsea 1a 530 >> KEMBER John Chelsea 1a 530 >> Williams Sarah Chelsea 1a 530
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
28 Apr 2008 06:07 |
Ya know, dang it, I was going to check here and there for KEMBERs, it being an obvious first possibility, and I wandered off to go argue with some loony gun nuts in the US instead ...
Damn thing is I did check 81 and 91 for *any* Sarah born 1862ish in STROUD. I fogot to look for STROOD.
;)
Good show!
|
|
Battenburg
|
Report
|
28 Apr 2008 06:04 |
1891 census. Latitia C Bourne widow1839 Kingstown St Vincent occ living on own account Edith L Bourne 1869 Georgetown,W J Mabel W Bourne 1863 British Guiana Sarah Kember married 1862 Strood Gloucestershire occ domestic servant.
address 44 Powes Sq Kensington
|
|
Battenburg
|
Report
|
28 Apr 2008 05:22 |
Heres a birth Ethel Kember 1896 sept qt Richmond Sry Surrey gro ref 2a 393
|
|
Battenburg
|
Report
|
28 Apr 2008 04:51 |
Heres the marriage to confirm Kathryns findings.
William Charles Boswell 1899 sept qt Richmond Sry. Surrey gro ref 2a 942. Other name on the page Sara Alice KEMBER. Now we all now about mistranscriptions on bmds so this is likely them
You need to get this marriage cert to confirm the names of the fathers if they are on the cert. Also for names of witnesses which might help you. If William was only about 16 he would need his parents permission or he just lied about his age.
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
28 Apr 2008 03:41 |
I'm not having much luck identifying William Boswell in the 1881 and 1891 -- except for this possible; in 1891:
Name: William Boswell Age: 9 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1882 Relation: Son Father's Name: Charles Mother's Name: Mary Gender: Male Where born: Surbiton, Surrey, England Civil Parish: Kingston Ecclesiastical parish: Christchurch County/Island: Surrey Country: England Registration district: Kingston Sub registration district: Kingston ED, institution, or vessel: 27
Alice Boswell 6 Charles Boswell 48 - Gardener Edward Boswell 11 - Errand Boy George Boswell 14 - Printer's Assistant Mary Boswell 42 - Laundress Rose Boswell 18 - Dressmaker Sarah Boswell 21 - Dressmaker William Boswell 9
Right location. Father's name Charles matches with middle initial "C" in 1901. Sister Rose matches with daughter's name.
And how it kinda looks is that William was considerably *younger* than he said in 1901, with Sarah being considerably *older* than she said.
And while possibly not exact in the details, it could all fit with what you said:
"my pops would not talk about his family shame, but he did say they were romanies and sarah was a dweller, so the family disowned william"
in the sense that there was some scandal there.
It actually looks like Sarah's family was quite respectable, but Sarah herself may have been somewhat less so! All of her children seem to have been given to her parents at birth.
And when she and William hooked up, she would have been about 35 and he about 16 ...
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
28 Apr 2008 03:18 |
And in 1891:
Name: William Kimber Age: 4 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1887 Relation: Grandson Gender: Male Where born: Notting Hill, London, England Civil Parish: Kensington Ecclesiastical parish: St Clement County/Island: London Country: England Registration district: Kensington Sub registration district: Kensington Town ED, institution, or vessel: 33b
>> George Kimber 6 >> William Kimber 4 Amelia Williams 15 Arthur Williams 11 Ellen Williams 24 Emily A Williams 21 George Williams 49 Rose F Williams 18 Sarah L Williams 50
Largish family -- all the Williams children are children of George & Sarah.
Where's Sarah Williams Kimber?? (if Kimber she was)
No idea!
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
28 Apr 2008 03:03 |
Name: Rose Amelia Boswell Year of Registration: 1900 Quarter of Registration: Jan-Feb-Mar District: Richmond Sry County: Surrey Volume: 2a Page: 426
No Ethel Boswell born in Surrey c1897.
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
28 Apr 2008 02:56 |
And here are William and Sarah in 1901, with Sarah underestimating her age by 10 years:
Name: Sarah A Boswell Age: 29 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1872 Relation: Wife Spouse's Name: William C Gender: Female Where born: Gloucester, Gloucestershire, England Civil Parish: Richmond Ecclesiastical parish: Holy Trinity County/Island: Surrey Country: England Registration district: Richmond Sub registration district: Richmond ED, institution, or vessel: 14 Household schedule number: 77
>>> Ethel Boswell 4 >>> Rose A Boswell 1 Sarah A Boswell 29 William C Boswell >> 24 - Painter
No wonder!
Name: William C Boswell Age: 24 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1877 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Sarah A Gender: Male Where born: Kingston, Surrey, England
Name: Ethel Boswell Age: 4 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1897 Relation: Daughter Father's Name: William C Mother's Name: Sarah A Gender: Female Where born: Richmond, Surrey, England
Name: Rose A Boswell Age: 1 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1900 Relation: Daughter Father's Name: William C Mother's Name: Sarah A Gender: Female Where born: Richmond, Surrey, England
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
28 Apr 2008 02:50 |
That household in 1881 -- same address, same occupation for George; Sarah L in 1901 seems to be Louise in 1881:
Name: George Williams Age: 37 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1844 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Louise Gender: Male Where born: Stroud, Gloucestershire, England Civil Parish: Kensington County/Island: London Country: England Street address: 11 Silchester Rd Condition as to marriage: Married Occupation: Cabinet Manufacturer Registration district: Kensington Sub registration district: Kensington Town ED, institution, or vessel: 35a
Alice Williams 4 Arthur Williams 2 Emily Williams 10 George Williams 37 George Williams 15 Louise Williams 38 Louise Williams 14 Mary Williams 5 Rosey Williams 7
Here's the household in 1871:
Name: George Williams Age: 28 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1843 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Louisa Gender: Male Where born: Stroud, Gloucestershire, England Civil Parish: Kensington Ecclesiastical parish: St Clement County/Island: London Country: England
Registration district: Kensington Sub registration district: Kensington Town ED, institution, or vessel: 31a Household schedule number: 233
Rd Brown 19 Eve Haynes 20 Ed Longhurst 33 Emily Williams 5 months George Williams 28 George Williams 5 Louisa Williams 29 Louisa Williams 4 >>>> Sarah Williams 9
and I'm betting that's your Sarah Williams.
Name: Sarah Williams Age: 9 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1862 Relation: Daughter Father's Name: George Mother's Name: Louisa Gender: Female Where born: Stroud, Gloucestershire, England
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
28 Apr 2008 02:42 |
Something.
In 1901:
Name: Dorothy Kimber Age: 7 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1894 Relation: Granddaughter Gender: Female Where born: Notting Hill, London, England Civil Parish: Kensington Ecclesiastical parish: St Clement County/Island: London Country: England Registration district: Kensington Sub registration district: Kensington Town ED, institution, or vessel: 39 Household schedule number: 71
Dorothy Kimber 7 William Kimber 14 George Williams 58 Sarah L Williams 59
A Dorothy Kimber with Williams grandparents.
Grandfather named George -- which was the name of a brother of Dorothy, per your info. Mother named Sarah, which was the name of Dorothy's mother.
Too coincidental to be coincidence?
|
|
WayneTracey
|
Report
|
27 Apr 2008 03:33 |
yes i agree with you on that...
Shame we can't get much further on this...
|
|
Katherine
|
Report
|
27 Apr 2008 03:31 |
Since the birth was pre 1926, the fact that a birth record for a possible twin can't be found, doesn't rule out the existence of a twin if it was still born
|
|
WayneTracey
|
Report
|
27 Apr 2008 03:21 |
The time thing doesn;t always hold water, there have been incidences where the registrar just added the time to be overly efficient...
There have been a few people on here tripped up over that over the years !!
|
|
Katherine
|
Report
|
27 Apr 2008 03:18 |
If there is a time against the date of birth then there was more than one child born alive at the birth. If however a mother had twins, one live born and one still born, then the live born twin will not have a time against the birth. I believe that until 1926 there were no registrations at all of a still born child. Having said that, again the early registrations are not consistent.
If a child lived even for a few seconds there should be both a birth registration and a death registration but I think in the early days that this wasn't always done.
|
|
Kim
|
Report
|
27 Apr 2008 03:06 |
that is a possibility i have no-one to ask , but i will follow all leads , , cheers
|