Suggestions
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
New Tree v Old Tree
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
William | Report | 26 Jul 2012 21:56 |
Before anyone starts I know technology moves on - my computer is updated automatically and works perfectly well. I am a bit older which is why I went for GR - nice and simple and easy to use. Somebody please explain how the new site is progress and more efficient. Every single thing you do now is more convoluted and protracted and takes 2-3 times longer to do. It is not faster and data was well presented visually before. Now you have to go hunting in a box and scroll about when before it was all just there. If you add more arms and legs and processes it is obvious there are more things that can go wrong. Once you do get something done something else disappears and so you end up deleting what you did in the first place. No matter how hard I try I cannot see what we have got now is progress or more efficient when it takes a lot longer to do, and then of course it doesnt work. I suspect GR sees the grass on the other side is greener and wants to add gimmicks and features and lost sight of the simple fact that LESS is often MORE especially when it worked and new doesnt. GR has already done it and should now give customers/members a CHOICE so that they keep members. It costs a lot more to replace an existing customer with a new one especially when you go on chat rooms and see all the customer dissatisfaction. So now guys please explain how this is progress? Bill |
|||
|
James | Report | 27 Jul 2012 17:41 |
|
|||
|
William | Report | 28 Jul 2012 02:45 |
|
|||
|
Roger | Report | 28 Jul 2012 10:53 |
Also on the old tree you could just scroll down other trees and get the FULL list not anymore I can only she the firt 20. |
|||
|
Jonesey | Report | 28 Jul 2012 12:50 |
It may only be temporary but for now you can get back to the old tree: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
stellaburton | Report | 16 Aug 2012 21:57 |
|
|||
|
JustJohn | Report | 17 Aug 2012 20:12 |
William |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
William | Report | 18 Aug 2012 06:06 |
William |
|||
|
JustJohn | Report | 18 Aug 2012 08:24 |
Don't like "stupid tree"much, either, William. How about challenging, revealing, blinding.... |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Jean | Report | 19 Aug 2012 17:27 |
i agree with all the letters so far the tree is rubbish and they have lost a lot off my dates etc they took over a month to try and sort it then said sorry no can do |
|||
|
William | Report | 22 Aug 2012 01:00 |
If i can not have my old tree back it is Goodbye from me |
|||
|
Glenys | Report | 23 Aug 2012 16:10 |
Old tree back PLEASE! I renewed just before the change - a mistake! |
|||
|
stellaburton | Report | 23 Aug 2012 20:06 |
Hi glynis i have just renewed to Another Mistake Stella. :-| |
|||
|
Jennifer | Report | 24 Aug 2012 17:23 |
I've belonged to GR for years and have got on very well with it. This new set up is awful!! The old trees were much more user friendly and easy to gain information. I've been trying to look at matches on other trees which I've been doing for years but can't get anything to come up. If it doesn't improve I'll certainly not renew my subscription. |
|||
|
manetta | Report | 24 Aug 2012 19:25 |
Sylvia 24 08.2012 |
|||
|
Elaine | Report | 25 Aug 2012 12:25 |
Well I have decided not to renew my subscription next month as however much I try to get the hang of the new tree system it won't let me. I know the names are on the tree but it also takes longer as you have to put the whole name in again whilst before it automatically came up with only a few digits of the name. I hate it. More than likely a man's idea and as I am not computer literate anyway takes me twice as long. Elaine B. Gloucester. |
|||
|
Joanna | Report | 25 Aug 2012 18:54 |
I really am upset by the new tree.It far too slow to use productively. My swearing has also increased 10 fold. |
|||
|
JustJohn | Report | 25 Aug 2012 19:15 |
Joanna |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
stellaburton | Report | 25 Aug 2012 21:13 |
Hi Please Please! Sort this mess out it is most frustrating I am not the only dissatisfied member out there!!!!!!!! Stella. :-( |
|||
|
Glenys | Report | 27 Aug 2012 16:48 |
I am strangely pleased to see that I am not alone - see previous comment! How do we get them to take us all seriously? |