Suggestions
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
NEW TREE
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
LadyScozz | Report | 13 Jul 2012 01:41 |
GR |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 13 Jul 2012 03:25 |
I have had a look at the new family tree. I even entered some details but now if I look at my old tree or the list in the new tree I have duplicated people. I'm not going to enter anything else on my tree until it is fixed. |
|||
|
LadyScozz | Report | 13 Jul 2012 11:29 |
I am totally fed up with GR messing about. |
|||
|
FrankFromYorks | Report | 13 Jul 2012 14:11 |
As I have commented elsewhere and in feedback, not showing the names of the owners of linked trees on the My tree page is a step backwards. I now view a tree not knowing whos tree I am looking at ! So when I spot a discrepancy or point which I disagree with - who do I contact to tell them ??????? A typical example of the choices I get when viewing other trees are View the Taylor tree or View the Taylor tree or View the Taylor tree. 3 entirely different people but who ? Was someone actually paid to create this farce ? :-S |
|||
|
Porkie_Pie | Report | 13 Jul 2012 15:46 |
What suprises me is that profesional companies like (GR)( brighsolid )are supposed to be, |
|||
|
LadyScozz | Report | 14 Jul 2012 02:21 |
testing testing 1 2 3 4 |
|||
|
philmoir | Report | 14 Jul 2012 12:58 |
Hi, Just to let you know that someone on the team is reading through the issues being reported, although I haven't had too much time recently to get too involved in responding. The issues reported all seem quite valid, and with regard to the tree, I would recommend using the feedback option on the tree, as this is reviewed daily by the tree development team. With regard to Gedcom, GR have never provided full compatibility for importing all data. But it should not be converting data to any other format. These are bugs and should be reported in the usual way to support. But it is also worth posting Gedcom issues on the tree feedback, as the two are closely linked. The greater the amount of feedback on the tree feeback system the quicker the issues can get resolved. With regard to testing, we are constantly evolving new functions and features, and it just is not possible to have beta test cycles. although we are planning more of this in the future. Thanks again for the feedback. Phil (sorry for duplicating this post across threads) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
BeverleyW | Report | 14 Jul 2012 21:53 |
Haha I think it's rather ironic that I typed out quite a long and detailed message for 'Report Feedback' - not all of it derogatory - and what happened? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
LadyScozz | Report | 15 Jul 2012 10:50 |
I have access to a tree owned by a member who doesn't use a name. Instead of a name he/she has three occupations! |
|||
|
Paul | Report | 15 Jul 2012 15:29 |
"With regard to testing, we are constantly evolving new functions and features, and it just is not possible to have beta test cycles" |
|||
|
Porkie_Pie | Report | 15 Jul 2012 19:28 |
Paul, We have seen how this unprofessional approach has affected GR |
|||
|
Robert | Report | 15 Jul 2012 22:27 |
I cannot send feedback either, keep getting error message as well. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
nameslessone | Report | 17 Jul 2012 15:17 |
Mine seems to have gone back to tree owners names - whicih is lucky because I few months ago I went through them all & made a note of which family name was associated with each owners name. |
|||
|
JerryH | Report | 17 Jul 2012 20:27 |
Well you can't please everybody. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
SuffolkVera | Report | 17 Jul 2012 20:40 |
Jeremy, |
|||
|
JerryH | Report | 17 Jul 2012 21:00 |
Vera |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
SuffolkVera | Report | 17 Jul 2012 22:10 |
I haven't tried using any other browser because I feel GR should get it right for IE as that is supposed to be the most used browser. But, like you, I'm not going to get worked up about it. I hardly use my tree on here anyway - all the important stuff is on my own PC on Family Historian software. I just seems a shame that GR isn't working more efficiently for those members who are more reliant on it. |
|||
|
Kense | Report | 17 Jul 2012 22:29 |
I use IE9 and the search function works OK for me. |
|||
|
JerryH | Report | 18 Jul 2012 10:03 |
Thank you Ken |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
SuffolkVera | Report | 18 Jul 2012 10:30 |
Brilliant Ken. Unclicking Compatability worked for me too. I still find it annoying that every other site I use seems to work perfectly without all this fiddling about but many of us are having to rely on help from good people like yourself to operate GR. |