Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Kucinta
|
Report
|
26 Jun 2022 15:04 |
Re the casualty lists discussed at length previously, I don't believe the 1942 missing man was missing in India though transcribed as such.
The 1942 original typed list has
Expeditionary Forces
2 Home and stations abroad
( a ) Abroad
India
Various entries
THEN
(b) Home
Missing 11th Brigade South Staffordshire Regiment 4928580 Herbert Pte WC 29.8.42
So I don't think he went missing in India at all, he has unfortunately been lumped in with genuine 'India' records further up the page.
I will PM Glenise the actual list images, not that it really helps with the mystery, other than to seemingly confirm the second reg no.
|
|
Andysmum
|
Report
|
24 Jun 2022 16:44 |
At the moment you don't have to visit the Archives. You can download digital archives for free. The link below tells you how.
https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/about/news/digital-downloads/
|
|
Glenise
|
Report
|
22 Jun 2022 20:13 |
Hi Sorry bit late replying yes been in touch with British military history .co.uk in 2014 Rob Palmer they could not find him. Writing to National Archives in 2016 followed their recommendations to dead ends again wrote in 2019 like said on letter home his number is 4925850? Rear Party 4925850 MT.HQ 11th South Staffs Ussleby Hall Camp Nr Market Rason . Then I find a W.C.Herbert with slightly different number W.C.Herbert South Staffordshire reg 4928580. Therefore I was thinking if he was injured someone else wrote letter home for him and made mistake or maybe he did himself but due to injury he wrote the wrong number on letter home so been searching for years for wrong service number. Now if he was injured and could no longer serve he would have a pension I would have thought . If he was injured and he passed away in hospital or just after release from hospital there would be record. I know from family members (now deceased) no way he would have committed suicide. I am hoping that someone who researches records may come up with something. We now have National Archives reference number from MOD but it is getting to National Archives to do research being some distance away from it. Thanks to everyone who is reading thread
|
|
ArgyllGran
|
Report
|
10 Jun 2022 09:36 |
Glenise - you said you had been in touch with "South Staff historians".
What did they say? Were they looking only for a death record? Or could they not find any kind of record for a W C Herbert in the 11th battalion, including enlistment?
|
|
ArgyllGran
|
Report
|
10 Jun 2022 09:33 |
Hmmm - how confusing, GG!
I wonder if the NA has more detail than that.
The only ones of those four records to mention 11th Battalion are the ones with the date 29 Sept 1942 - ie - missing, and then listed in error. As far as I can discover, the 11th was never in India, and not even abroad anywhere - so if a man of that name was captured in India, he's not Glenise's man.
"Hostilities-only battalions
The regiment raised six other battalions before and during the war but these were used mainly in home defence roles or training units for the battalions overseas, or converted to other roles such as the 14th Battalion which was raised at Hereford racecourse in July 1940 was sent to guard the beaches at Gt.Yarmouth and Caister In late 1942, transferred to the Royal Artillery and converted into the 103rd Anti-Tank Regiment, Royal Artillery and trained in Scotland. However, the regiment was disbanded in August 1943. The 12th Battalion was converted to 91st Light Anti-Aircraft Regiment, Royal Artillery and served with the 4th Infantry Division. >>>>>> The 11th Battalion was raised in 1940 and joined the 209th Infantry Brigade as a training battalion. Following the end of the war, the 11th Battalion was posted to the Middle East where it was disbanded." https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/South_Staffordshire_Regiment
Joining the 209th Infantry Brigade wasn't until 1944. https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/209th_Infantry_Brigade_(United_Kingdom)
The man captured in India must have been in the 1st Battalion, though the record posted by GG doesn't specify:
"During the "Chindits" campaign in Burma, the 1st Battalion was part of the 77th Indian Infantry Brigade and were selected for conversion to the Chindits role and fought in Operation Thursday, the second Chindit expedition.[18] During the expedition George Albert Cairns of the regiment was posthumously awarded the Victoria Cross.[19] The battalion took part in jungle fighting against the Japanese forces. After serving as Chindits, they were transferred to the Parachute Regiment, becoming parachute infantry, and converted to the 16th Parachute Battalion.[20] The battalion joined 50th Indian Parachute Brigade, part of the 44th Indian Airborne Division." https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/South_Staffordshire_Regiment
But the transcriptions don't explain fully. We know Walter was definitely in the 11th .
The two W C Herberts can't both have had the same number. So if the man in India was 4928580, perhaps Walter's number was 4928850 after all, as written in the letter home.
But there's no online record of anyone with that number. Surely the MOD must have a record somewhere of Walter's enlistment, whatever his number was. Perhaps his whole record has been included with that of the other WC Herbert, if their numbers were similar.
Walter , in the 11th, probably WAS listed as missing on 29 Aug 1942. Presumably the man in India was also listed as missing, until it was confirmed that he'd been captured. At some point, someone may have assumed that the two "missing" records were for the same person.
I would still want to see the full army record , assuming more exists than just those lists above.
After several mergers, the Staffordshire Regiment is no more.
The Staffordshire Regimental Association has a Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/groups/1staffordsregassoc/
|
|
greyghost
|
Report
|
9 Jun 2022 22:32 |
You have to excuse the jumbled order of these records - it's the way FMP shows them as 2 columns, but they copy and paste as one with the columns merged!!
First name(s) W C Theatre of war India Last name Herbert Archive reference WO 417/52 Year 1942 PIece description Casualty Lists - Other Ranks 946 - 961 Capture year 1942 Archive The National Archives Service number 4928580 Record set British Army Casualty Lists 1939-1945 Rank Private Category Military, armed forces & conflict Rank as transcribed Pte Subcategory Second World War Regiment South Staffordshire Regiment Collections from Great Britain, UK None Regiment as transcribed South Staffordshire Regiment From original - a typed list Under "Missing" heading 11th Bn. South Staffordshire Regiment 4928580 Herbert Pte W.C. 29 .8.1942
--------------------- World War 2 Allies Collection Great Britain
Transcript of W C's record
First name(s) W C Country Great Britain Last name Herbert View the original source View the record's source Service number 4928580 Original source British Army Casualty Lists 1939-1945 Rank Private Record set World War 2 Allies Collection Regiment South Staffordshire Regiment Category Military, armed forces & conflict Ship or regiment South Staffordshire Regiment Subcategory Second World War Year 1942 Collections from Americas, Australasia, Great Britain, Ireland, UK None Capture year 1942
This is a Transcript only
---------------- World War 2 Allies Collection India Add to tree Print Person with no specified gender Transcript of W C's record Copy to clipboard First name(s) W C Country India Last name Herbert View the original source View the record's source Service number 4928580 Original source British Army Casualty Lists 1939-1945 Rank Private Record set World War 2 Allies Collection Regiment South Staffordshire Regiment Category Military, armed forces & conflict Ship or regiment South Staffordshire Regiment Subcategory Second World War Year 1942 Collections from Americas, Australasia, Great Britain, Ireland, UK None Capture year 1942 Another Transcript only record
----------------------------- British Army Casualty Lists 1939-1945 Great Britain
Transcript of W C's record Copy to clipboard First name(s) W C Regiment as transcribed South Staffordshire Regiment Last name Herbert Archive reference WO 417/56 Year 1943 PIece description Casualty Lists - Other Ranks 1027 - 1050 Capture year 1942 Archive The National Archives Service number 4928580 Record set British Army Casualty Lists 1939-1945 Rank Private Category Military, armed forces & conflict Rank as transcribed Pte Subcategory Second World War Regiment South Staffordshire Regiment Collections from Great Britain, UK None Findmypast
Original - typed list. It's a list of Corrections to a list that was made up before. Covers various theatres of War and shows such things as POW's, wounded, Missing, POW previously reported as missing, wounded, KIA
Missing - 11th Bn south Staffordshire Regiment 4928580 Herbert Pte W.C. 29.8.1942 The above entry should be deleted (Listed in error|)
|
|
KathleenBell
|
Report
|
9 Jun 2022 15:00 |
No, it doesn't say Missing in Action, just Missing.
Kath. x
|
|
ArgyllGran
|
Report
|
9 Jun 2022 12:22 |
Kath said "The casualty record says that the soldier with the number 4928580 went missing on 29th Aug. 1942"
Given the date, that does sound as if it could be your man. After the letter home, but before the start of his leave.
It doesn't say MISSING IN ACTION, does it , Kath?
If it just says MISSING, that would fit with your Frederick. No matter what the MOD says, if it were my search, I would want to get the record from the NA and check for myself.
There is no online record anywhere for anyone with the number 4928850, and your thought that the number was written wrongly by mistake on his letter seems like a reasonable possibility.
FMP seems to have 4 results for a WC Herbert, when searching with key"word" 4928580, but I don't have a sub to FMP to see the details:
Herbert W C 1942 British Army Casualty Lists 1939-1945 Great Britain Herbert W C 1942 World War 2 Allies Collection Great Britain Herbert W C 1942 World War 2 Allies Collection India
Herbert W C 1943 British Army Casualty Lists 1939-1945 Great Britain
|
|
Glenise
|
Report
|
9 Jun 2022 11:45 |
Hi Thanks for info I did pursue the missing in action one for W C Herbert but in conversation with MoD they said it was not him ??? Walter Clinton Herbert does seem a very difficult phenomenon for which I intend to get to bottom of eventually he deserves to be laid to rest properly and we as a family need to know what happened to him . I thank each and everyone of you for trying to help and information you have all given. But welcome any ifo from those who may know more . Glenise x
|
|
ArgyllGran
|
Report
|
8 Jun 2022 19:07 |
He was in a "rear party" in 1942, per his address. MTHQ means Military Transport Headquarters.
Here is an article by a soldier who was in a rear party, probably in late 1990s ("some years" before the Afghanistan war, anyway) , but maybe gives a clue as to Frederick's possible state of mind ??
https://military.odb.org/military-stories/stuck-on-rear-party/
|
|
KathleenBell
|
Report
|
8 Jun 2022 14:59 |
The casualty record says that the soldier with the number 4928580 went missing on 29th Aug. 1942
There is another record for the same man that says capture year 1942. Theatre of war - India. :-
First name(s) W C Theatre of war India Last name Herbert Archive reference WO 417/52 Year 1942 PIece description Casualty Lists - Other Ranks 946 - 961 Capture year 1942<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Archive The National Archives Service number 4928580 Record set British Army Casualty Lists 1939-1945 Rank Private Category Military, armed forces & conflict Rank as transcribed Pte Subcategory Second World War Regiment South Staffordshire Regiment Collections from Great Britain, UK None Regiment as transcribed South Staffordshire Regiment
Kath. x
|
|
ArgyllGran
|
Report
|
8 Jun 2022 09:04 |
Oh. I see! Your earlier post didn't say that the Army knew about it, so it sounded as if the finding of the clothes was just a rumour.
In that case, there will be something in his Army record - but possibly only stating that his clothes were found and he was missing - which you already know.
However, finding clothes doesn't prove death, so no death cert could or would be issued.
Having him declared dead, which would be expensive but otherwise not a problem after so long, does seem to be the only way forward, to allow the Army record to be accessed.
WC Herbert 492580 seems to have a record dated 1943 as well as one dated 1942, per forces-war-records.co.uk - though that may just be some note added after a reasonable length of time to say that he was still missing (if that's the right man) :
W C Herbert 4928580 Private 1943 South Staffordshire Regiment W C Herbert 4928580 Private 1942 South Staffordshire Regiment
I don't have a sub to that site to see the details. These are just Army records - not casualty records.
That site has no record for 4928850. Neither number appears on the CWGC site.
|
|
Glenise
|
Report
|
8 Jun 2022 01:01 |
Hi No someone from Army came to his mothers house to tell them that his clothes were found on beach, what beach we do not know, when this was we do not know. But obviously after time of his letter home and his upcoming leave, unless he was called to serve and his leave cancelled So yes someone does know something this is pretty obvious to the family.
I came across W.C.Herbert on Army casualty list under a different number Private W.C.Herbert South Staffordshire Regiment 4928580. If you notice the new number is slightly different but they are too similar to ignore that this maybe the same person. the old number on letter home was 4925850. Fingers crossed. I am thinking if he was injured maybe someone else wrote letter for him and never wrote correct number on letter. This maybe different people in South Staffordshire Regiment with Same name ??? Clutching straws here :(
|
|
ArgyllGran
|
Report
|
7 Jun 2022 13:52 |
You say he was not on leave at the time of his disappearance. How do you know?
He wrote home in August 1942, saying he would be coming in a couple of weeks' time - which would be his leave in September.
Are you assuming that he disappeared before he was due to go on leave?
It seems more likely that he went on leave as planned - but didn't go home.
If he was still in the army, surely they would have been in touch with his family when he didn't return after his leave? If they didn't contact the family, the implication would be that he had left the army without telling the family.
Didn't the family contact the camp when he didn't turn up on leave?
If his clothes were indeed left on a beach, then either he had committed suicide, or he'd gone swimming and met with an accident, or he'd wanted to make it look as if one of those things had happened. If the third possibility is the correct one, he may have changed his name in order to deliberately disappear.
However, there doesn't seem to be anything we can do to help, from what's available online. The army record is the only hope of any possible clues - for which the family will have to have him declared dead.
Families can't always tell what's going on in someone's mind.
|
|
Glenise
|
Report
|
7 Jun 2022 10:14 |
Hi All Yes we have considered he may have been still alive. He was not on leave at time of his disappearance though, this is the thing that is not easy to comprehend. He never arrived home when his leave should have been in September1942 according to his letter home. According to his family his sister in law still alive and nephews nieces still alive my dad (deceased )was one of them he would never have committed suicide no matter how hard life may have been or what he was going through he really was not the type. It's hard we just need to know someone must know something it maybe have been a story one of his company who served in Army South Staffordshire Reg Useelby POW camp based in Market Rasen think was German Officers holding camp has passed down to their families. Thank you
|
|
ArgyllGran
|
Report
|
6 Jun 2022 18:38 |
If still alive, he will be 100 years old in July.
Not impossible, but probably not very likely.
|
|
Gwyn in Kent
|
Report
|
6 Jun 2022 16:13 |
Have you considered that he could possibly still be alive somewhere?
|
|
ArgyllGran
|
Report
|
6 Jun 2022 14:48 |
If the army knew that he had died, they would have notified his family . But they may not have known what had happened to him.
If he didn't report back for duty after his leave ended, they would have contacted the family to find out where he was, and there will be something about it in his army record.
See the link I posted previously re how to have someone declared dead .
I don't know what date they would put on it - but at least there would then be a death cert, and the army record could be released by the National Archives.
If he did leave his clothes on a beach, and presumably committed suicide, his body may not have been found. Or if it did, but the body couldn't be identified, his may be one of the many "unknown" deaths registered every year.
|
|
Glenise
|
Report
|
6 Jun 2022 12:12 |
I Have this information but thank you Brian his brother died in Canada where he and his family emigrated. His sister Annie died in Wales. The MoD have stated that they will return my postal order to me I have that in black and white from them. The fact is that as he was serving in the armed forces it should be them that are responsible for his death being notified as he was in their care being a soldier. He was not a civilian he was in Army. I do not know anything other than seeing the last letter he wrote home 23rd August 1942 when he was returning home in 2 weeks. How do you apply for death certificate if you do not know date he died, how or where he died? Even if we now obtained a death certificate it does not answer these questions which we want answering.
Thank you so much
|
|
ArgyllGran
|
Report
|
5 Jun 2022 14:20 |
His record is still closed on the 1939 Register - though should be open later this year, as it will be 100 years since his birth:
For our reference:
Charles T Herbert in the 1939 England and Wales Register Name: Charles T Herbert Gender: Male Marital Status: Married Birth Date: 31 Aug 1891 Residence Date: 1939 Address: 6 Elkington St. Residence Place: Coventry, Warwickshire, England Occupation: Axle Shatts Setter Line Number: 36 Schedule Number: 162 Sub Schedule Number: 2 Enumeration District: Qdcw Borough: Coventry Registration district: 390-1 Household Members Age Ruth Bower 75 - widowed - 26 May 1864 Charles T Herbert 48 - married Annie Herbert 20 - 26 Dec 1919 This record is officially closed. This record is officially closed. He had siblings Annie (registered 1920) and Brian 1928. I don't see his mother in 1939. She died 1954.
Marriages Dec 1918 (>99%) Bower Ruth K Herbert Chesterfield 7b 1516 Herbert Charles T Bower Chesterfield 7b 1516
|