Find Living Relatives

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

EYRE

Page 1 + 1 of 2

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Susan

Susan Report 30 Aug 2015 21:23

I am of the same opinion as you so I will see what Wendy can find. Thank you for your help. :-)

JoonieCloonie

JoonieCloonie Report 31 Aug 2015 05:47

another bit of info because I was puzzled about the Ancestry user's reference to CWGC records in notes to the 1901 census, since Harry survived the war

what has happened is that the change of surname for Ernest 'Qie' to 'Eyre', with the explanation that applies only to him, has been applied to the other family members

http://www.cwgc.org/find-war-dead/casualty/3048937/EYRE,%20ERNEST%20EDGAR

... and it is a little interesting in that it says

'(Served as WEAVER). Son of Alice Eyre, of 158, Forster St., Radford, Nottingham.'

Ernest was 4 in the 1891 census so I'd say this is his birth

Births Jun 1887
Eyre Ernest Edgar Nottingham 7b 332

(he was 27 at death in August 1914)

So why did he serve as Weaver ...

could there have been a Michael Weaver? It's a bit of an Irish name, and I don't see one in Nottinghamshire.


4 people do have Ernest in their tree here, one of whom is a person who added notes to the 1901 household at Ancestry ... does none of them know anything of the Harry in that family?


Still no luck with a birth of brother Edward who was 9 in 1891 ... or as Edmund or Edwin, since the Ed* names were commonly muddled even by their owners


I would definitely try to contact the two people at Ancestry who have added to the 1901 census (if they aren't people you have already contacted through this site)