General Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
No votes for over 70’s
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
nameslessone | Report | 29 Oct 2019 13:30 |
There is a suggestion that over 70’s should not be allowed to vote. |
|||
|
LaGooner | Report | 29 Oct 2019 13:31 |
It would be better to have no votes under 21 |
|||
|
RolloTheRed | Report | 29 Oct 2019 14:00 |
That would be fine with me so long as over 70 did not pay any more income, investment, pension pot, capital gains taxes. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
nameslessone | Report | 29 Oct 2019 14:02 |
And that is why it will never happen |
|||
|
JoyLouise | Report | 29 Oct 2019 14:09 |
Precisely Rollo. Then we could all lead the life of Riley ..... |
|||
|
Dermot | Report | 29 Oct 2019 14:33 |
I have no party affiliation. I simply vote for whoever I think is best equipped to run the country fairly. |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 29 Oct 2019 14:50 |
So logically is it being suggested that over 70 have no say in what goes on and they have no voice |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
nameslessone | Report | 29 Oct 2019 15:02 |
Once they’ve got rid of those that have been around the block a few times and seen and experienced the good and the bad, they’ll give the vote to the 16 year olds. |
|||
|
supercrutch | Report | 29 Oct 2019 15:04 |
Who suggested this ridiculous idea again? Students debated it 4 years ago and this suggested rule was not supported. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
AnninGlos | Report | 29 Oct 2019 15:15 |
Where did you see this? Can't say I have seen it and can't see that it will be accepted |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Dermot | Report | 29 Oct 2019 15:32 |
Handy that - 2 topic election in December - Brexit & Age Limit. |
|||
|
SheilaSomerset | Report | 29 Oct 2019 15:41 |
'Young adults' will deem that 40 is old, so over 70 must be off the scale... |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
David | Report | 29 Oct 2019 15:53 |
|
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
nameslessone | Report | 29 Oct 2019 16:31 |
It could all be getting even worse: |
|||
|
Dermot | Report | 29 Oct 2019 16:49 |
'No taxation without representation.' |
|||
|
supercrutch | Report | 29 Oct 2019 18:02 |
We have coverage from HoC on a TV constantly simply because the media spin words, statements and even tonal inflections. Utterly pathetic biased reporting :-| |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JoyLouise | Report | 30 Oct 2019 08:24 |
I think this suggestion is only on some younger person's wish list, not to be taken seriously at all. You all know what I mean - I'll say it out loud and see what reaction I get. |
|||
|
'Emma' | Report | 30 Oct 2019 11:28 |
With you there Joy, would they try to take away our right to vote |
|||
|
Denburybob | Report | 30 Oct 2019 11:46 |
Perhaps we should all be put down at 70! |
|||
|
Denburybob | Report | 30 Oct 2019 11:47 |
....that was tongue in cheek, by the way, not to be taken seriously. |