General Chat

http://www.mccannfiles.com/

I doubt that.

But I do hope they are feeling a bit silly for making such a stupid mistake. :-D

Well that's good
Maybe they will think twice before pressing it again :-D

So I've had a nice email from GR saying they understand my frustration and they are monitoring who pushes the button wrongly etc, etc, but the post has gone.

I've asked them why, if they agree there was nothing wrong with it.

*shakes head sadly*

So Joy you recon they make it all up?
So why do they go to all this trouble looking for the truth?

https://cpj.org/killed/europe/france/

:-(

http://joana-morais.blogspot.co.uk/2016/04/cm-special-maddie-mystery.html?m=1


Does not sound like a bitter nasty person to me :-D :-D

Strange
For some reason, the Irish version of today's Sun did not publish this report

Maybe the Irish are to bright to fall for this rubbish :-D :-D

No one says you should believe all you read in newspapers, did they?

I said you were reading the wrong ones if you think all journos are biased. There are some excellent journos out there and not all write for newspapers. Having said that some newspapers are a lot more reliable than others, obviously.

I certainly live in the real world, not the realms of fantasy dreamed up by some journalists and websites.

Maybe Guinevere
But i prefer to live in the real world

Not read yesterdays secondhand news ;-) ;-)

I learned long ago not to believe all
I read in any Newspaper

You must be reading the wrong papers, Joy, there are some unbiased journos around. A shame you've never read any of their work.

Unbiased accounts from journalists
Rolls about laughing

There is no such thing ;-) ;-)

I would rather believe in the Easter bunny or Santa
than there been an unbiased Journalist out their somewhere :-D :-D

As I said, Joy, I was quoting The Sun. The Sun said they were trolls, if you don't like it ask them, I'm not responsible for their editorial decisions.

I won't read either book. I prefer unbiased accounts from journalists and writers I trust and from interviews I've seen.

So why are people who gave to one Trolls
Yet not to the other
Who have wasted millions suing people :-(

Please read his book Guinevere and then read Kates
and come back and tell me what you think
I really would like your View after reading both :-D :-D

No one has to give money to the fund.

No one has to give money to a discredited ex-cop. I certainly wouldn't but people can choose how to spend their own money, surely?

I think they have had enough out of a fund
That was meant to help find a lost little Girl :-D

He may think he did, Joy. Brit cops have said different. I don't know who to believe.

But I do know Carter Ruck never do Pro Bono. I don't think any libel specialists do.

Watson Woodhouse near us does :-D :-D
Quite often on high profile cases :-D :-D

I have finished his book now and found it very informative

He cooperated with the British police all the way :-D :-D

And Carter Ruck never do pro bono work.

What lawyer does? :-D

That's what it said in The Sun - Trolls -I was quoting them. If you don't like the word take it up with The Sun.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/7100537/Madeleine-McCann-cop-paid-50k-by-sick-Brit-trolls-after-accusing-her-parents-of-lying-about-her-abduction.html

Trolls so its ok for people to buy Kates book and fund them
Why cant a Ex Policeman make money out of his book
and accept donations to his legal fight
Everything about them is about Money

They would be better using the money
to find their daughter than legal fights :-D

Only 12/13 of the money they have had has been spent on an actually search
the rest goes to hanger ons wages

If Carter Ruck Clarence believed McCann's
they would work for free
Because they have had enough out of the fund already :-( :-(

And by the way His book is good I am up to chapter 20 now