Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Need help!
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
KathleenBell | Report | 3 Oct 2007 09:23 |
Paula, |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 3 Oct 2007 01:10 |
Look where she's living! |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 3 Oct 2007 01:04 |
1861: |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 3 Oct 2007 00:58 |
Sorry for the delay, GR VERY SLOW, then had to go out. |
|||
|
Helen | Report | 2 Oct 2007 22:25 |
Thanks for your help Kathleen. Much appreciated. |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 2 Oct 2007 22:21 |
Either of those are a possibility Helen - You need to get another of the children's birth certificates to see whether that has the maiden name as Oxley or Charlton. Only then will you be sure you have the right birth certificate for John. |
|||
|
Helen | Report | 2 Oct 2007 22:18 |
If William's mother-in-law was Jane Charlton, could that possibly mean that Elizabeth was a Charlton, or did her mother remarry? |
|||
|
Helen | Report | 2 Oct 2007 22:07 |
Thank you Ozibird |
|||
|
Helen | Report | 2 Oct 2007 22:05 |
On William's Death certificate it mentions his mother in law Charlton. |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 2 Oct 2007 22:04 |
According to 1901, Elizabeth was born in Sunderland. |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 2 Oct 2007 22:04 |
Kath |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 2 Oct 2007 21:57 |
No Julie - formerly and nee mean the same (maiden name). It's when "late" is written that it's a first married name. |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 2 Oct 2007 21:55 |
You need to get the birth certificate for one of the other children and see what the mother's maiden name is on that. |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 2 Oct 2007 21:52 |
Oops thanks kath, i alway get that bit muddled up. |
|||
|
Helen | Report | 2 Oct 2007 21:51 |
I'm still confused. |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 2 Oct 2007 21:49 |
Formerly does not mean married before. Formerly is put before the maiden name. |
|||
|
Helen | Report | 2 Oct 2007 21:48 |
I'll get Arthur's b/c but he was born after John. I can't see how it would help if it came up with the same as John's certificate. |
|||
|
Helen | Report | 2 Oct 2007 21:44 |
Ok. So how do I find out what her maiden name is. I don't appear to find her under Darlington records, but I could be wrong. |
|||
|
Helen | Report | 2 Oct 2007 21:35 |
No - that's all it states. Sorry |
|||
|
Helen | Report | 2 Oct 2007 21:27 |
Says formerly Oxley? Did originally check with Darlington RO and they said it was the correct one, even when I gave Charlton as her maiden name. That's why I'm confused |