Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
I KNOW YOU LOVE SOLVING MYSTERIES
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Heather | Report | 3 May 2004 16:49 |
Perhaps that side of your family will be more straight forward, you can always hope!! Good luck Heather |
|||
|
Lorraine (Lorr) | Report | 3 May 2004 16:40 |
Well I must admit I was thinking of resting that side for a moment and looking at my Dads side? I've only got my Grandad and Granny's name so far there. I've got a few cousins asking their parent's for information - luckily I think they originated in this country so I might get a few leads there? luv Lorr x x x |
|||
|
Heather | Report | 3 May 2004 16:31 |
I think sometimes they didn't know where they were born or they forgot. It gets confusing doesn't it? What are you looking for now? Let us know if you need help. Love Heather |
|||
|
Lorraine (Lorr) | Report | 3 May 2004 16:22 |
Hi Heather I've only got the information that the kind souls like yourself have been able to get for me - so I'm nor entirely sure either? I'm learning from more experienced people that you can't always believe what you're seeing? luv Lorr x x x |
|||
|
Heather | Report | 3 May 2004 16:18 |
Hi Lorraine, I was a bit puzzled by the 1881 census, if I've found the correct Catherine with her son, because it says she was born in Southampton and the son was born in Scotland, I'm wondering if it should be the other way round. Or did they travel between the two places? Do the other census records confirm the place of birth? Heather |
|||
|
Lorraine (Lorr) | Report | 3 May 2004 15:30 |
Thank you Heather - I'm not very good at detective work but there's always someone who will give you an idea of what to do next - isn't it nice of them? luv Lorr x x x |
|||
|
Heather | Report | 2 May 2004 18:36 |
Hi Lorraine I'm just reading the latest update on your family. You're really making progress with it now, aren't you? I'm so pleased for you. Love Heather |
|||
|
Lorraine (Lorr) | Report | 2 May 2004 16:09 |
Janet - Thanks again! luv Lorr x x x |
|||
|
Janet 693215 | Report | 2 May 2004 16:01 |
Please don't thank me,I'm just trying to avoid getting on with my own research!Oh!BTW these were also on there,same parents: Issabella ChirstyMacAurther born 06/08/1865 Mary Ann MacAurther born 18/07/1859 Heneriatta MacAurther born 13/10/1861 Donald MacAurther born 23/09/1857 and Male MacAurther born 14/06/1864(Probably died shortly after) Good luck with your research |
|||
|
Lorraine (Lorr) | Report | 2 May 2004 15:29 |
Janet - ARE YOU AN ANGEL? What a lovely thing to do - you've brightened up my day. Thank you VERY much - did I grovel enough? luv Lorr x x x |
|||
|
Janet 693215 | Report | 2 May 2004 15:02 |
Just found this on Family search Catherine MacAurther Born 26/03/1855 Uig,Ross and Cromarty,Scotland Father Angus MacAurthur Mother Margret MacKenzie Angus and Margaret were married 10/02/1854 in the same place,Uig.Margaret was known as Peggy at that time.(A diminutive of Margaret) Spelling wasn't always a strong point in Victorian times! |
|||
|
Lorraine (Lorr) | Report | 2 May 2004 14:41 |
Ah THANK YOU Janet! I was hoping someone else looking at this would come up with an idea or two. I kept on looking at it and in the end I thought before I add it all to my tree I'll just run it by someone else....Thanks again luv Lorr x x x |
|||
|
Janet 693215 | Report | 2 May 2004 14:32 |
I've read and re-read this thread and I think Kate and Catherine were the same person.While her first husband was at sea Kate took in lodgers to help make ends meet.She fell in love and became pregnant.In those days a woman was unable to divorce a husband and as Richard was at sea he didn't really enter the picture.(Chances are Richard had set up with someone else anyway)Therefore,Kate adopted her partners name and when her husband died she was at last free to marry.The 1891 census entry?Well it was a proper document and it wouldn't do to lie on something like that would it?(Apart from the age thing anyway)Loads of people loose a couple of years here and there. My own grandparents had to wait until my granddads first wife died and my mother was three before they could marry as his first wife was in a mental hospital. |
|||
|
Lorraine (Lorr) | Report | 2 May 2004 12:35 |
Hi me again! I wonder if anyone can look over these details to see if I'm missing anything? Kate McArthur 15 years on 1871 census Catherine McArthur marries 1876 Richard Conjujan Best Catherine Best 25 years on 1881 census ( Kate 'Clarke' formerly McArthur has Arthur Julius Clarke 5/11/1890 ) - she registered the birth. Catherine Best '33' on 1891 census Catherine Best nee McArthur 38 years marries - Julius Clarke 38 in 1896 Catherine Clarke 43 on 1901 census Sorry but I'm sure I'm missing something? Do you think Kate and Catherine are the same person? THANK you for your help - luv Lorr x x x |
|||
|
Heather | Report | 1 May 2004 22:37 |
Hi Lorraine Well, that sounds very hopeful, doesn't it? And the Scottish connection too which I think you mentioned before. This will keep you busy for a while. Love, Heather |
|||
|
Lorraine (Lorr) | Report | 1 May 2004 20:56 |
Hi Heather- a kind soul 'Debra' most wonderful asked if anyone wanted a Southampton look up on 1871. Low and behold there is an Angus McArthur and Margaret McArthur with various children - one Margaret 13 years. I just hope I'm looking at the same ones that are later on the 1881/1891? It's almost too good to be true! I mustn't go off too quickly because perhaps there are two families in Southampton - just maybe? The name Kate versus Catherine keeps coming up and I can't be absolutely sure that they're the same person so there's some work to be done I think? THANKS for your interest - you must have enough to do without my muddle! Luv Lorr x x x |
|||
|
Heather | Report | 1 May 2004 20:12 |
Hi Lorraine I've been having another look at the 1881 census, its on the familysearch website, can you get it on your computer? It seems that Angus was born in Southampton, his wife in Scotland then Catherine was born in Southampton and her son in Scotland. There weren't many McArthurs in Hampshire but I wonder if Margaret born in 1858 belongs to your family? Heather |
|||
|
Lorraine (Lorr) | Report | 1 May 2004 16:06 |
It's me AGAIN! Just found on Ancestry Richard Conjujan Best married Catherine McArthur Mar Qtr 1876 So I'm getting there! x x x |
|||
|
Lorraine (Lorr) | Report | 1 May 2004 14:09 |
I'm just wondering, it's possible that Catherine's parents were in Southampton also? That's why she was here then? I never thought of that. I wonder when they came to live down here? This is going to keep me going for a while I think. Thanks for everything you are a wonder! x x x |
|||
|
Heather | Report | 1 May 2004 13:35 |
Its 1881 and his wife is from Scotland and the lodger from Barbados. Heather |