Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Please say i'm not completly thick......
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Paul | Report | 15 Oct 2005 22:50 |
Walter certinatly didn't waste any time after Lucy died - he married Elizabeth 3 months later. Think Elizabeth killed her off? ******** UPDATE ******** Actually he wasted no time getting married to Elizabeth, I had the wrong record! He married Elizabeth the same time as Lucy died. Well thats one way about going about things without falling into sin! |
|||
|
☼ Orangeblossom ☼ - Tracy | Report | 15 Oct 2005 22:54 |
I doubt it lol They probably just came together for mutual benefits. Deaths Jun 1899 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Griggs Lucy 33 Freebridge L. 4b 199 |
|||
|
Paul | Report | 15 Oct 2005 23:00 |
Now this bit I get confused with, the only Elizabeth Ketteringham in Norfolk who was born around the same time was born in Feltwell. (Which if you don't know Norfolk very well, Middleton, and Feltwell are both in West Norfolk, but are a fair way from each other.) and she was married to a John Ketteringham. =( I'm so confused. My head hurts |
|||
|
☼ Orangeblossom ☼ - Tracy | Report | 15 Oct 2005 23:03 |
''the only Elizabeth Ketteringham in Norfolk who was born around the same time was born in Feltwell'' What are you talking about now? |
|||
|
Paul | Report | 15 Oct 2005 23:05 |
BUT!!!!! In the one with John Ketteringham, she had children, Ann was only 11 months and Lily 3. So unless they both died, they should have both been living with Elizabeth in 1891. So I have come up with the drastic dicesion that Ellen Elizabeth actually belonged to Elizabeths boss, as she was a domestic servent!!!! |
|||
|
Paul | Report | 15 Oct 2005 23:07 |
But i'm still confused. It cant be my Elizabeth in 1881 because of the reasons i've given! But how come there is no record of her before 1891! =( |
|||
|
☼ Orangeblossom ☼ - Tracy | Report | 15 Oct 2005 23:08 |
I don't understand what you're getting at...?? |
|||
|
The Bag | Report | 15 Oct 2005 23:09 |
Paul you have lost me ...and everyone else, i shouldn't wonder. I give up! do you have any evidence of anything at all? Any certs ANYTHING? jess |
|||
|
Paul | Report | 15 Oct 2005 23:10 |
Well Ive decided that the Elizabeth I found in 1881 Cannot be my Elizabeth because my elizabeth doesnt have a record of any children in 1891 called Ann, and Lily. (Unless they both died at a young age) But how come there isn't any record of my Elizabeth in Norfolk in 1881 then? And the dates dont fit. Maybe she just appeared on day? |
|||
|
☼ Orangeblossom ☼ - Tracy | Report | 15 Oct 2005 23:10 |
This is the same Elizabeth in 1881 as the one you found in 1891... Elizabeth Kitteringham abt 1860 Middleton, Norfolk, England Servant Tilney Cum Islington, Norfolk, England |
|||
|
Paul | Report | 15 Oct 2005 23:12 |
Yes Tracey! That my Elizabeth! Aha! |
|||
|
The Bag | Report | 15 Oct 2005 23:13 |
Tracy - has the mist lifted where you are? - I'm lost in it all completely! Have we now changed the family name to kitter..rather than ketter... |
|||
|
☼ Orangeblossom ☼ - Tracy | Report | 15 Oct 2005 23:13 |
No Jess, I'm still confused by it all lol |
|||
|
Paul | Report | 15 Oct 2005 23:14 |
But why cant I find this Elizabeth in the 1881 Census? :S I'm going to cry in a minute! |
|||
|
☼ Orangeblossom ☼ - Tracy | Report | 15 Oct 2005 23:15 |
Do a Soundex search on Ketteringham. She'll show up. Ketter, Kitter... all the same in the end really lol |
|||
|
The Bag | Report | 15 Oct 2005 23:17 |
Paul - i think you need to go right back to the begining and find out who you need us to find. |
|||
|
Paul | Report | 15 Oct 2005 23:19 |
Aha! Finally! The madness ends! (Kinda) Well i've come to the conclusion that Ellen was the love child of one of the Ingrams, we cant find who she married anywhere so it must be her boss'! |
|||
|
Paul | Report | 15 Oct 2005 23:20 |
'Paul - i think you need to go right back to the begining and find out who you need us to find.' No need, I've come up with my own conclusion! |
|||
|
The Bag | Report | 15 Oct 2005 23:21 |
Ok, Paul , if you are happy, we are delirious! Au revior!! Jess x |
|||
|
Paul | Report | 15 Oct 2005 23:24 |
Thanks guys - i need bed now - my brain is leaking out of my ears! bye bye! |