Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

census look ups offered 1851 to 1901

Page 1 + 1 of 2

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Debbie

Debbie Report 26 Mar 2006 19:42

here goes Edwin Davies married Sarah Beaver 1874 both aged 19 on thier marrage cert father named as Alfred Davies profession Ostler they had a son Tom Davies b. 1879 I know Edwin died around the same time as on the 1881 census Tom was with his grandparents who I know brought him up that is every thing I know thanks I do appreciate this Debbie

Elizabeth

Elizabeth Report 26 Mar 2006 20:00

Karen mary was 9 yrs old in this census which means she was born before marriage. it also says schedule no 114 oldbury road west bromwich. lizz

MaryfromItaly

MaryfromItaly Report 26 Mar 2006 20:07

Thanks a lot, Elizabeth - now I have an approximate date of birth for John, I may be able to make some more progress with him.

Karen

Karen Report 26 Mar 2006 20:17

Elizabeth many thanks for looking. you may have found my 1st big fib!! can I be a pain and now ask you to check that the age for Ruth , that it definately says 2 months... Somethings not quite right here.with Mary..... as she is listed on the 1871 1871 mary aston age 10 tipton,west bromwich staffordshire,occ. scholar,living schedule no.61,oldbury rd, west bromwich staffordshire regards karen

Elizabeth

Elizabeth Report 26 Mar 2006 20:20

Debbie so sorry this one is evading me.where did they get married or where was thomas born to give me a bit of a starting point please. lizz

Elizabeth

Elizabeth Report 26 Mar 2006 20:22

Karen ,, it definately said 2 months i can email you it if you want. lizz

Karen

Karen Report 26 Mar 2006 20:30

Thanks Elizabeth they are starting to get the better of me, think someone may have made an error on either ruth or Mary (years or months or I have really big liars!!!) 1871 ruth aston age 12(1859) b.Tipton Staffordshire, occ. scholar. living schedule no.61.oldbury rd, west bromwich staffordshire. if you have the image that would be lovely. thanks very much. regards karen

Elizabeth

Elizabeth Report 26 Mar 2006 20:31

Karen maybe not a fib but could be another child as 1st mary may have died.i have found this happens alot. lizz

Karen

Karen Report 26 Mar 2006 20:41

Elizabeth I have sent you a PM with email addy. The aston lot have been really good up to now and mostly give a second/ middle name to replacement kids. (I think I am going to have to dig out my new magnifying glass and check details printed on marriage cert-haven't seen it in a whlie) Edwin & his father Isaiah have yet to be discovered on the 1851--(several people have previously tried looking for them to no avail)

Debbie

Debbie Report 26 Mar 2006 20:43

yes I know this one is a head ach one all I know it could be Monmouth thanks again Debbie

Karen

Karen Report 26 Mar 2006 20:50

many thanks for image it is super clear. Cheers Elizabeth, well will have to get to bed now(11pm here up in 5hrs!) & get searching bmd's again . best regards karen

Elizabeth

Elizabeth Report 26 Mar 2006 23:12

Karen please check hotmail as i have left you a message .i found them in 1851 census lizz

Karen

Karen Report 27 Mar 2006 06:58

Oh Lizz what a fab Mother's Day Pressie! you found them you are a *superstar* thanks so much for finding them on the 1851 & yet another new christian name, Nehomi(Naomi) I think maybe on the 1861 the enumerator should have put Ruth as 2yrs & Mary as 9months ( I maybe wrong,as I have yet to find their BMD's, but Ruth is on 71 age 12 & married on 81 age 22) best regards Karen

Elizabeth

Elizabeth Report 27 Mar 2006 07:27

Karen, glad to be of assistance lizz