Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
late birth registration
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Caz | Report | 8 Apr 2006 14:19 |
That's handy to know Andrew - it only has the registrar's name Carole |
|||
|
Andrew | Report | 8 Apr 2006 14:13 |
If the registration was really a year late then the cert would have had to be signed by the registrar AND the superintendent registrar. If it only has the registrar's name then it's just a mistake writing the date. Andrew |
|||
|
Caz | Report | 8 Apr 2006 13:53 |
Kate Would this be on the beta index on Ancestry? |
|||
|
Lynn | Report | 8 Apr 2006 13:51 |
Thanks Merry, It did seem a bit unlikely, my cousin thinks that they got married then so they could qualify for the newly introduced pension! I hope to order the cert when I've got the funds! Lynn |
|||
|
Caz | Report | 8 Apr 2006 13:51 |
Sorry all, been busy mailing Lancashire Registration office to ask them to check the dates Porkie Pie - yep realised I'd put my foot in it maths wise after (lol) Carole |
|||
|
Kate | Report | 8 Apr 2006 13:48 |
Carole - I just realised something. If it was a late registration, then there should be a handwritten entry on the GRO birth index for the quarter in which he was actually born, saying 'see Mar 1878' or whatever quarter it was that the registration took place. So you can check for that, and if it isn't there I would bet on it being a mistake on the certificate. Kate. |
|||
|
Kate | Report | 8 Apr 2006 13:47 |
That's right, Merry, my mother's birth certificate says her birth was registered the January BEFORE the December in which she was born! Kate. |
|||
|
Merry | Report | 8 Apr 2006 13:38 |
Lynn, it's highly unlikely that the 1908 entry is a late reg for an 1860's marriage. More likely there was a reason they couldn't marry earlier, such as one of them already having a spouse (not saying this IS the reason!) Carole, Was your ancestor born in January?? If he was then it might be a slip of the pen by the registrar, entering the previous year by mistake......You know how it is,.....1st Jan we are all really concious of the new year, but after a few weeks we make a slip and write the previous year by mistake! Merry |
|||
|
Porkie_Pie | Report | 8 Apr 2006 13:37 |
Carole, if born in DEC 1877 then he would be aged 4 on an 1881 April? He would be 3 years old, would not be 4 years untill dec 1881 Roy |
|||
|
Lynn | Report | 8 Apr 2006 13:33 |
Hi, can I just ask if anyone knows if a marriage registration could be late? My Great great grandfather was listed on 1871 census as being married, with children dating back to 1864 but the only marriage record I can find is in 1908! could this be a mistake do you think? The names are Edward Chapman Barley and Septiana Anderton, so not likely to have the wrong one. Lynn : ) |
|||
|
Zoe | Report | 8 Apr 2006 13:33 |
I think anything is possible I was helping a friend and her father was not registered until over 20 years later by his mother we haven't figured out why she redistered him so late as all the other children were registered at the right times, And when you goto the year of his birth he is hand written at the bottom and his page number is Mch31 showing he was registered in March 1931. ~ very strange Zoe |
|||
|
Caz | Report | 8 Apr 2006 13:27 |
Thanks for tips all - am busy trying to sort my maths out now - oh dear - they only kept me in O level maths because they had to. :-) |
|||
|
Merry | Report | 8 Apr 2006 13:25 |
If you got the cert from the GRO, don't bother going back to them......contact the LOCAL reg office where the cert was issued and ask them about their copy, which will be the original. Merry |
|||
|
Caz | Report | 8 Apr 2006 13:22 |
Yes think so, if fhe was born in DEC 1877 then he would be aged 4 on an 1881 April census not three. But as he wasn't living with his parents then they could also have made a mistake. Best do as you suggest Annette, make sure there hasn't ben amistake from the GRO. Carole |
|||
|
Annette | Report | 8 Apr 2006 13:17 |
I'd check with the office that issued the certificate, my Grandad's birth certificate states he was registered in 1907 (he was born in 1901) but when I checked with the Registry Office they had actually made an error when they wrote out the certificate. Update: If the GRO have made a mistake they should replace the certificate free of charge I would think. Annette |
|||
|
Caz | Report | 8 Apr 2006 13:12 |
Hi Marry from the cert I have him on the 1881 census - right age - hold on, am off to check update on 1881 age 3 ---oh , being thick here, what was the census date? |
|||
|
Merry | Report | 8 Apr 2006 13:09 |
Where have you got the two dates from?? Are they the dates on the actual cert? How old is he on the 1881 census? Merry |
|||
|
Caz | Report | 8 Apr 2006 13:06 |
Helen Yes, I read through some of the previous threads about this - can understand late registration for reasons of school, marriage etc, but why for a one-year old? |
|||
|
Caz | Report | 8 Apr 2006 13:05 |
Spot on Pippa - he was illegitimate |
|||
|
Pippa | Report | 8 Apr 2006 13:03 |
Is it possible that his parents weren't married when he was born? |