Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Any medical experts out there?
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Tracy | Report | 18 Jun 2006 02:13 |
Andrew I appreciate the apology as I might have not made my question clear from the outset. It was the () that i was querying about not the Haemorrhage |
|||
|
Darksecretz | Report | 17 Jun 2006 23:29 |
hiya'll, doctor did certify death, but like tracy said i think this one, is just gonna have to remain a mystery, as to what happened, but i think OC is on right track, seems most likely thing to have happened Julie |
|||
|
Tracy | Report | 17 Jun 2006 23:28 |
Your probably right OC. such a shame i only found out about this a few weeks ago. he would have been my uncle. he wasn't even named. My Dad doesn't even know why or how (I'm searching for my Dad) Just updated that as it didn't read right |
|||
|
Andrew | Report | 17 Jun 2006 23:23 |
Quite so. I have a number of death certs from 1940 that just give the cause of death as 'Due to war operations'; no certifying doctor, no (a, b, c) or (i, ii, iii) or anything. I assume a lot of the usual procedures were waived during the blitz. Andrew. |
|||
|
An Olde Crone | Report | 17 Jun 2006 23:19 |
1940...war on...no-one would be all that bothered about why a newborn baby died (except the poor mother of course). OC |
|||
|
Darksecretz | Report | 17 Jun 2006 23:17 |
hiya andrew, it was 1940, is why it made me wonder cheers all for input, it has helped Tracy alot i think Julie |
|||
|
Tracy | Report | 17 Jun 2006 23:16 |
Thanks it was nov 1940 so will just accept what info I have. but as I said was the (a) or (II) that I couldn't understand. |
|||
|
Andrew | Report | 17 Jun 2006 23:12 |
Hi Julie, As Olde Crone says, a torn placenta could well account for it. A modern death cert would probably give more info but if this was 1913-4 I doubt if you would find out more unless there was an inquest. Andrew. |
|||
|
Tracy | Report | 17 Jun 2006 23:06 |
He was 3 hours old. How depressing for a saturday night sorry. |
|||
|
Darksecretz | Report | 17 Jun 2006 23:06 |
hiya, yes andrew, u gottit in one, or should that be (i)???LOL but what type of haemorrhage could affect a baby? only 3 hrs old, surley if it was cerebral it would've said?, just think it was odd just to put haemorrhage and nowt else Julie |
|||
|
Tracy | Report | 17 Jun 2006 23:02 |
the only reason i asked was because there is definately a (a) or (ii) and i hadn't seen it before. And it looks more like (ii) than (a) |
|||
|
An Olde Crone | Report | 17 Jun 2006 23:01 |
Did the baby die at or near birth? In which case it could have been a torn placenta which caused the baby to haemmhorage, especially if the mother was not being attended at the birth. Placenta praevia would also cause a fatal haemmhorage in a newborn baby. OC |
|||
|
Andrew | Report | 17 Jun 2006 22:58 |
So you're saying that there's only one cause of death listed, and it's either (ii) or (a), but you can't tell? In that case, regard it as the primary cause of death and don't worry about secondary causes. Registrars can make mistakes, particularly over such trivialities as the difference between (ii) and (a). Come to think of it, (ii) implies that there should be a (i), and if there isn't, it's probably meant to be (a). Andrew. |
|||
|
Tracy | Report | 17 Jun 2006 22:57 |
Thanks the last replies make more sense as i know it was a full term baby Grandma got married nov 1913 i knew she didn't get pregnant til 3 months later. so it wasn't a prem baby, was just curious as to what the ( ) meant. |
|||
|
Darksecretz | Report | 17 Jun 2006 22:48 |
hiya, i have seen the cert, it definately is either (a) or (ii) and just haemorrhage, absolutly nothing else, which is what puzzled me, like u say if there are secondary causes you'd expect then too be listed too, but there is nothing Julie |
|||
|
Andrew | Report | 17 Jun 2006 22:44 |
Sorry, I didn't notice the distinction between (a, b) etc. and (i, ii) etc. in your original post. As I understand it, the difference is that (i, ii, iii) etc. give the immediate causes of death, where (a, b, c) etc. give secondary causes. These days you get (1, 2, 3) listed instead of (i, ii, iii). For instance, I've seen a death cert which gave the cause of death as (1) Multiple Injuries; (a) Fallen from a train. In other words, it was the multiple injuries that caused the death (immediate cause) but the fall from the train which caused the injuries (secondary cause). Hope this helps. Andrew. |
|||
|
Unknown | Report | 17 Jun 2006 22:43 |
If there are a)s or i)s it means that other causes of death are listed too, they are numbered or alphabeticised to tell them apart. A haemorrhage is an uncontrollable bleed. nell |
|||
|
Darksecretz | Report | 17 Jun 2006 22:37 |
hiya, what tracy means is the two things on cert before haemorrhage, is either (ii) or (a) The mother actually lived, but doesnt give anyother info except Haemorrhage for the childs death, was only 3 hours old, bless it, hope this helps to clarify thank you Julie |
|||
|
Perranmaid | Report | 17 Jun 2006 22:35 |
There are many types of haemorrhage. It depends on where the bleed is. i.e Brain haemorrhage in common simple terms a stroke. If you cut yourself even slightly you heamorrhage. It relly depends whether there is any other info on the certificate to give a clue. |
|||
|
Andrew | Report | 17 Jun 2006 22:35 |
Well, it's sometimes specified where the blood loss came from (brain haemmorhage, lung haemmorhage, stomach haemmorhage etc.), but otherwise I'm not aware of any difference. Andrew. |