Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Workhouse
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Donna | Report | 10 Sep 2015 20:33 |
I don't like it but I think I've gone as far as I can go with Margaret and Bridget. |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 10 Sep 2015 20:38 |
there are 2 possibilties as to why we can't find Margaret and Bridget on the 1901 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JoonieCloonie | Report | 10 Sep 2015 20:39 |
if that is Thomas father of Margaret, the Tucker girls were slightly older than stated |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 10 Sep 2015 20:40 |
Sorry Donna, I got a bit lost with that Thomas ! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JoonieCloonie | Report | 10 Sep 2015 20:41 |
oops I got leapfrogged :-) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JoonieCloonie | Report | 10 Sep 2015 20:45 |
1901 Irish census |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 10 Sep 2015 21:39 |
Joonie, I've tried the same, first name, surname , variations of Carney , and even for Bridget, 'infant', 'baby', and just the birth year + -2 and can't find anything either :-( |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 10 Sep 2015 21:44 |
Did anyone get any further with this? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 10 Sep 2015 22:05 |
I also had tried only Bri*et, Marg*, etc etc |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JoonieCloonie | Report | 10 Sep 2015 22:09 |
I tried at CWGC site but there is no Carney who died on 11 Nov 1918 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 10 Sep 2015 22:13 |
I was wondering if, as the marriage was in 1895 there might have been another child or children before Bridget? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 10 Sep 2015 23:35 |
Edit post removed, info already posted and I missed it. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Mary | Report | 11 Sep 2015 10:28 |
13/5/1916 James Carney was at 32, Chaucer Street Bootle same place as Bridget and Thomas in 1911. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Donna | Report | 11 Sep 2015 11:34 |
Thanks Mary, how do you get access to all those records like the one stating he was in Chaucer Street in 1916? |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 11 Sep 2015 11:46 |
Donna many of us use other sites as well as this one, some of the records come from Ancestry which has some Liverpool records not available here, some from free sites like www.lan-opc.org.uk/ , some things are found just by googling a combination of names. :-) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Mary | Report | 11 Sep 2015 14:04 |
A tree on ancestry has the address where James was in 1916,records of his sailings are also on ancestry.co.uk |
|||
Researching: |