Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
John Hamilton, b 1771 d 1837, Beaminster
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
KeithG | Report | 10 Oct 2013 13:13 |
Ah, thanks, I'd missed the significance of that. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 10 Oct 2013 12:45 |
The marriage info I posted refers only to her mother's name................. |
|||
|
KeithG | Report | 10 Oct 2013 10:08 |
Those census data reinforce the idea that Elizabeth Clift was 94 at death. Must have led a healthy life :-) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
KeithG | Report | 10 Oct 2013 09:59 |
Thank you for the Kiddle references, in fact I had not found those. I believe this Elizabeth Hamilton was the daughter of John and Elizabeth (Clift). |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
KeithG | Report | 10 Oct 2013 09:52 |
Good morning Reggie! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 10 Oct 2013 09:05 |
1851 census |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 10 Oct 2013 09:03 |
No doubt you have the following info, but I'm posting it in case it helps others who may be attempting to assist you in your quest |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 10 Oct 2013 09:01 |
1841 census |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 10 Oct 2013 08:59 |
Apologies....wasn't aware of your location. |
|||
|
KeithG | Report | 10 Oct 2013 00:12 |
Well it's time to sign off for tonight, thanks Lesley and Reggie, I'll pick up any further thoughts in the morning ... |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Diamonds-R-A-Girls-Best-Friend | Report | 10 Oct 2013 00:11 |
Keith you can always contact the OPC Zoe Martin she will probably be very helpful. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
KeithG | Report | 10 Oct 2013 00:05 |
Thanks Lesley, I've already found some useful dates there - but not for Elizabeth or JH birth unfortunately! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Diamonds-R-A-Girls-Best-Friend | Report | 10 Oct 2013 00:02 |
Hello Keith apart from the family search site which Reggie suggested you might like to try this one too. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
KeithG | Report | 9 Oct 2013 23:50 |
Visiting the County Records Office would be ideal, but as I live in France it's a bit of a challenge :-( |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 9 Oct 2013 23:41 |
No, I don't know why the records differ........... |
|||
|
KeithG | Report | 9 Oct 2013 23:34 |
Thanks for the other marriage record, that agrees with what I already have, so do you know why the other record says day 6? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 9 Oct 2013 23:26 |
From the IGI |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 9 Oct 2013 23:22 |
Unsubstantiated entries on trees should be treated as 'suspect'........at best |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 9 Oct 2013 23:20 |
Dorset, England, Births and Baptisms, 1813-1906 |
|||
|
KeithG | Report | 9 Oct 2013 23:15 |
That marriage record matches what I know - almost. I have a record from Beaminster which says the marriage was 13 Sept 1795, the record you found says "Day:6", should that be taken to mean the date of marriage? |
|||
Researching: |