Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Help with Scotlands People Site
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
KiwiJoy | Report | 27 Sep 2012 23:07 |
Does anyone have access to Scotlands People? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 27 Sep 2012 23:19 |
1895 census ? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
KiwiJoy | Report | 27 Sep 2012 23:31 |
Thanks for your reply. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
KiwiJoy | Report | 27 Sep 2012 23:34 |
Sorry, just realised that it should be the 1891 Census. Mary was born in 1895. Slip of the finger. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 27 Sep 2012 23:35 |
Contact the site and advise them of the problem with viewing the image |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 27 Sep 2012 23:36 |
You can't find on the 1891 census a person born in 1895 |
|||
|
KiwiJoy | Report | 27 Sep 2012 23:38 |
I'll do that now. Thanks for your help. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
KiwiJoy | Report | 28 Sep 2012 00:55 |
Thanks for your help people. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 28 Sep 2012 09:55 |
If you tell us who you're looking for, with accurate date info it may be possible to help |
|||
|
KiwiJoy | Report | 28 Sep 2012 13:40 |
Hi Reggie, here's what I have. I should warn you that I have been helped before on this site, but nobody could solve the puzzle for me... |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Malcolm | Report | 28 Sep 2012 14:37 |
Surely you mean the 1911 census. If not, why are you searching 1896 to 1906 if she was born in 1891. Also, if she appears in a census her place of birth should be shown. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
wisechild | Report | 28 Sep 2012 14:48 |
If William & Margaret weren´t married until 1896 & Mary was born in 1891, surely she was the child of William´s previous wife. |
|||
|
wisechild | Report | 28 Sep 2012 15:15 |
Malcolm. |
|||
|
Malcolm | Report | 28 Sep 2012 15:46 |
1900 Mary Edward Cook VIVERS born Ruthwell, Dumfries 846/00 0011 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
KiwiJoy | Report | 29 Sep 2012 04:29 |
Hi everyone, |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 29 Sep 2012 09:45 |
1911 England Census |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 29 Sep 2012 09:51 |
They are living at the same address in both 1901 and 1911.......so there's no logical reason to suppose that any child of the marriage was born anywhere else. |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 29 Sep 2012 09:54 |
This is the child born 1900................regardless of speculation about naming patterns, she is NOT the child being sought |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 29 Sep 2012 09:56 |
Although, on 1911, Margaret says she has borne a child during the marriage, it may be that Mary was not their natural daughter. |
|||
|
wisechild | Report | 29 Sep 2012 13:44 |
I see that on the marriage record, Vivers has been mistranscribed as Vevrs. |