Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Andrew Byers born NSW Australia c1886
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Gee | Report | 19 Aug 2012 14:47 |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>youre not fast enough to catch me :-D |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 19 Aug 2012 15:00 |
I think that the 1921 marriage in NSW is a red herring. There was an Andrew Joseph Byers born in Victoria in 1895, I'm leaning towards that marriage being his. |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 19 Aug 2012 15:06 |
Baptism of a daughter: |
|||
|
Gee | Report | 19 Aug 2012 15:10 |
You might be right MC and heres us casting aspersions on poor Beatrice! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 19 Aug 2012 15:10 |
.. and another: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 19 Aug 2012 15:12 |
I think Hazel should definitely get Beatrice's death cert to see who informant was and if anything on marital status. |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 19 Aug 2012 15:14 |
The two daughters that I've posted baptisms for are on the 1911 census, which states that they'd had 3 children but only two living. This must be the little mite that died: |
|||
|
Gee | Report | 19 Aug 2012 18:07 |
Hi Hazel |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 19 Aug 2012 18:16 |
No, haven't had a pm :-( |
|||
|
Gee | Report | 19 Aug 2012 18:36 |
OK....MC has been PANTS |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Hazel | Report | 20 Aug 2012 09:57 |
Hi everyone, |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 20 Aug 2012 10:01 |
Hazel - NO!! the marriage to Evelyn Mudie should be ignored, I added a later post to say that it appeared to be the marriage of an Andrew JOSEPH Byers. |
|||
|
Hazel | Report | 20 Aug 2012 10:07 |
I am beginning to think he was a bit of a lad - the marriage cert. does not say anything about Australia. On the l911 census it has a comment : British subject by parentage - is this a mistake by the enumerator what are your feelings as a lot of other stuff seems to add up. |
|||
|
Hazel | Report | 20 Aug 2012 10:08 |
Thanks for putting me right. Hazel. |
|||
|
Hazel | Report | 20 Aug 2012 10:14 |
I did see your post it about Andrew Joseph Byers - didn't realise I was on the 2nd page of notes - you can see I need training - hope this does not give away my age ;-) The old grey cells need sharpening this morning. I am getting the hang of this now - I think! |
|||
|
Gee | Report | 20 Aug 2012 10:20 |
Were Andrews parents British? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Hazel | Report | 20 Aug 2012 10:36 |
Another thought and you may find interesting. |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 20 Aug 2012 10:37 |
I think the family were from Canada, but I'm thinking British Commonwealth .... |
|||
|
Gee | Report | 20 Aug 2012 10:39 |
Theres a tree at Ancestry but boy have they got the lines muddled! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Hazel | Report | 20 Aug 2012 11:06 |
The death record matches the information from Gary. |