Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
27 May 2011 20:59 |
Good to see that you have sorted your tree out.
You're very welcome to any help that we can give you.
As Cynthia said, come back if you need any more help.
You can always find this thread again by looking in My Threads in the box to the elft.
sylvia
|
|
Cynthia
|
Report
|
27 May 2011 08:02 |
Good to hear you are sorted Marina.
If you want to add any further information to your tree, then the MCA site is definitely the one to search. Vera and I have both spotted the same information and it's so interesting to see the actual handwritten records.
Come back to us if you need any more help.
Regards. Cx.
|
|
Marina
|
Report
|
27 May 2011 03:14 |
Hi sylvia.think my tree is now sorted but will do a lot more searching and double check it here goes james buggs+emma elizabeth spain; james buggs+louisa jarrad james bnuggs+rachel hawkins;james buggs+mary weller; richard buggs+mildred haysell; william buggs+mary plummer;john buggs+margaret messam;richard buggs+ elizabeth wyburn.so many thanks for your help. best regards marina ;-)
|
|
Marina
|
Report
|
27 May 2011 02:01 |
sylvia hi.e-mailed a person on a tree to see if we had any links and her tree had the wrong james such coombes his spouse was racheal emily buggs and the census match.his mother and father were edward coombes and sarah buggs.and her parents were philip buggs and hannah nordish is that strange or what .i find it strange that the buggs name appears twice in the family but will do some more checking out thanks to every one who helped me great team marina :D
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
27 May 2011 00:29 |
you're very welcome, Marina
and, no, many of the trees on ancestry cannot be trusted.
Too mnay people just copy the information from another tree, and never check that the information is correct.
You are doing the right thing in attempting to find your own information, and double checking.
sylvia
|
|
Marina
|
Report
|
27 May 2011 00:13 |
hi marina here the thought did cross my mind that some trees may not be right.have been checking out a few sites as well but keep coming up with the same answers as you have .ido agree with what you have found and some of the paper work you have is more detailed than i have seen .i shall make sure i copy that so i have them for keeps.i am very grateful for all your hard work and couldnt have done it without you guys.i have even been looking at graveyards. thanks again. :D
|
|
Mel Fairy Godmother
|
Report
|
26 May 2011 20:06 |
London, England, Marriages and Banns, 1754-1921 about James Buggs Name: James Buggs Age: Full Age Spouse Name: Louisa Jarrad WIDOW************
Marriage Date: 12 Apr 1879 Parish: St James, Muswell Hill County: Middlesex Borough: Haringey Father Name: James Buggs Tailor Spouse Father Name John Smith Paper Maker Deceased His address Woodchurch Kent Her address St James Muswell Hill
James Buggs the groom is a Gamekeeper
|
|
Cynthia
|
Report
|
26 May 2011 19:47 |
Hello Marina.
When you have had a look through the help you've been given, let us know what you think. I am pretty sure that we have found the right parents for your James born 1795..
Don't worry too much about linking up with other people's trees as they may not have the right info so don't copy anything from anyone else unless you are sure it is right :D
Hope to hear from you soon. Cx
|
|
Vera2010
|
Report
|
26 May 2011 19:47 |
Marina
As Sylvia says no birth certs. I have had sight of the parish birth record for James on the CityArk site. It says the same as record already posted ie Jan 4th 1795 Buggs James son of James and Mary.
Nothing additional on the register as is the norm.
I've looked for another marriage for James and Mary other than the one you know of already i.e. James and Mary Weller - nothing coming up at present.
Vera
|
|
Marina
|
Report
|
26 May 2011 18:37 |
hi cynthia and vera sorry not been in touch but skys internet been down in south wales and the west country.thanks for your hard work.if i purchased a birth certificate would his parents be on it? i dont know if i sent this message earlier but am redoing it again just in case.thanks again will be in touch later. marina ;-)
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
26 May 2011 18:37 |
Marina
Registration of births, marriages and deaths did not start until July 1 1837
So, certificates are not available before that date.
Before July 1 1837, the only record is in the actual Parish Registers .......... many of these are now being slowly put onto the internet
and this is what we have all been finding for you.
Unfortunately, you will almost never find the names of BOTH parents on any marriage certificate, even up to the present day.
and not even the fathers' names appeared in early certificates, and especially not in the Parish Registers.
so I'm afraid the answer is NO.
sylvia
|
|
Marina
|
Report
|
26 May 2011 18:23 |
sorry havent got back to you sooner but skys internet was down today for south wales and the west country so havent been able to do anything. if i purchased a birth certificate for james (1795) would his parents be on it? thanks to all for your help will do some more looking later. marina ;-)
|
|
Vera2010
|
Report
|
26 May 2011 15:17 |
Cynthia
Brilliant site but not sure I'm finding the easiest way to search. Maybe I'm expecting too much. Had to go through lots of jpegs but never mind top marks to the volunteers and you find lots of interesting things as you go.
Glad you confirmed that Morris surname.
Marina
There is a Jonathan Morris born in Higham in 1810 in 1841 and subsequent census he is unmarried. It is possible Jane was his sister not wife. EDIT just realised could not be the same Jonathan as he would have been aged 12 at the time of the marriage.
Vera
|
|
Cynthia
|
Report
|
26 May 2011 09:58 |
Well spotted Vera.....I hadn't got round to Higham parish as I was still nose deep in Meopham!! :D
Definitely Jonahthan and Jane Morris....he could write his own name whilst she put her mark.
I just LOVE that site don't you?
Marina, stay with it and let us have your response. Keep checking back. :D
Cx
|
|
Vera2010
|
Report
|
26 May 2011 02:41 |
Marina
I found the original of the marriage cert Sylvia posted. It's on the site that Cynthia mentioned - Cityark.
Rachel Hawkins is a widow
Witnesses Jonathan and Jane ???? Morris
Unfortunately no parents listed.
Vera
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
26 May 2011 00:06 |
Marina
If by "by changing his date of birth" you mean the year of birth as shown on a census
Please do NOT BE CONCERNED about that.
The census asked for the actual age of a person in YEARS on the night of the census
The census is not taken on the same date every time ..................... so the age on the census depends on the date of the census vs the person's actual birth date
It might be that that one census the person's birth day was two days AFTER the census, while on the next census the birth day was one month BEFORE the census
so ages can be out 1-2 years from census to census.
THEN, the current-day transcriber had to transcribe the AGE into YEAR of birth
you will note that the census record shows "abt 1833" .... that means approximately 1832 ...... based on the best guess of the transcription from actual age to year.
You also have allow for the fact that people often did not know how old they were, or remember how old their children were .............. birth days were just not as important to them as now.
For this reason, you should ALWAYS search records on year of birth +/-2
In fact, I rarely search on less than year of birth +/- 5, just to cover all bases.
Also .................. enumerators on the 1841 census were supposed to round DOWN ages over 15 to the nearest 5. Not all did it, but most did
so someone shown as 20 on the census was actually somewhere between 20 and 24.
Secondly, birth places
sometimes people did not know where they were born.
They might have been born in one village, but then grew up from a baby in another village ............. so they assume they were born in the second village.
Mum might have gone home to her mother for the birth, and then back home to husband. Or the family might have for father's job.
Another common so-called error could be caused by the enumerator
Joe says "I was born at Jones Farm"
enumerator asks "where's that then?"
Joe "at Ashfield"
enumerator "where's that then?"
Joe "near Ipswich"
enumerator "Ah, I know where that is, so I'll put you down as born in Ipswich".
remember always that most of our ancestors were illiterate, and some of the enumerators might not be much more literate.
In short, never be too dogmatic when searching!
Don't always expect to get the same birth year, birth place, same spelling of names, etc.
sylvia
|
|
Marina
|
Report
|
25 May 2011 23:32 |
Hi sylvia,yes all the info you sent me is spot on what is so confusing is when they keep changing his date of birth and birth place.so at least i know that that part of my tree is correct .i've made the mistake of following other trees and spent weeks checking it out only to find i'm not right thanks for all your work much appriecated.i feel happier now i know i am going in the right direction. best regards and many thanks :-)
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
25 May 2011 22:34 |
??? marriage of James and Louisa
from freebmd.org.uk
Marriages Jun 1879 (>99%) Buggs James Edmonton 3a 285 Jarrad Louisa Edmonton 3a 285
James b. ca 1832 in 1861, with his parents?
1861 Census
Name: James Buggs Age: 28 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1833 [1832] Relation: Son Father's name: James Buggs Mother's name: Rachel Buggs Gender: Male Where born: Ash, Kent, England Civil parish: Ash County/Island: Kent Country: England Registration district: Dartford Sub-registration district: Farningham
James Buggs 65 b.ca 1796, Meopham, Kent, Postmaster Rachel Buggs 65 b.ca 1796, Portsmouth, Hampshire James Buggs 28
and in 1841?
1841 Census
Name: James Buggs Age: 8 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1833 [1832] Gender: Male Where born: Kent, England Civil parish: Ash Hundred: Axton, Dartford and Wilmington County/Island: Kent Country: England Registration district: Dartford Sub-registration district: Farningham
James Buggs 47 b.ca 1794, Kent, Tailor Rachel Buggs 45 b.ca 1796, not born in Kent Emily Buggs 17 b.ca 1824, Kent Tabithy Buggs 15 b.ca 1826, Kent James Buggs 8
Address:- Ash Street
sylvia
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
25 May 2011 22:15 |
I know you have these, but I'm posting the various records in an attempt to get my head around the Buggs family
Is this your grandfather's baptism?
record title: England Births and Christenings, 1538-1975
name: James Buggs gender: Male baptism/christening date: 05 Mar 1871 baptism/christening place: ORPINGTON,KENT,ENGLAND father's name: James Buggs mother's name: Louisa indexing project (batch) number: C00837-2 system origin: England-ODM source film number: 992515
and is this him with his parents in 1881?
1881 census
Name: James Buggs Age: 42 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1839 [1832] Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Louisa Buggs Gender: Male Where born: Wrotham, Kent, England Civil parish: Brenchley County/Island: Kent Country: England Street Address: Cottage No 2 Condition as to marriage: Married
Occupation: Game Keeper Registration district: Tunbridge Sub-registration district: Brenchley
James Buggs 42 Louisa Buggs 40 b.ca 1841, Hale, Devon Rose Buggs 12 b.ca 1869, St Marys Cray, Kent James Buggs 10 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Lilly Buggs 9 b.ca 1872, Wrotham, Kent Thomas Buggs 7 b.ca 1874, Wrotham
and in 1871??
Name: James Buggs Age: 34 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1837 [1832] Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Lauria Buggs Gender: Male Where born: Ash, Kent, England Civil parish: Sutton At Hone Ecclesiastical parish: Canterbury Town: Sutton At Hone County/Island: Kent Country: England Registration district: Dartford Sub-registration district: Dartford
James Buggs 34 Game Keeper Lauria Buggs 30 b.ca 1841, Hale, Devon <<<<<< name corrected to Louisa Rotas Buggs 2 b.ca 1869, Sutton at Hone, Kent <<<<<< name corrected to Rose James Buggs 2 Months b.ca 1871, Sutton at Hone
sylvia
|
|
Marina
|
Report
|
25 May 2011 17:19 |
hi cynthia.have put in my new names into my tree still no matches the only one that matches mine is my 2nd cousin david spain and he can only get as far as my matches.i am begining to think hes the scarlet pimpernal.yes i have asked others if my tree lines up with theirs but no joy.i have e-mailed some others but dont hold out any hope.ive searched on geni,and loads of other sites ,but many thanks for allyour help at least i know that rachel and james are right.thanks again. best regards marina :S
|