Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Blacknell and Tudbury
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Carol | Report | 25 Oct 2010 13:52 |
I have two dilemmas. One, I think my ancestor Hannah Blacknell b.1826 may have married a William Tudbury b.1825. Both of Hucknall Nottinghamshire. I can't find marriage record though. The 1861 census shows they are working a farm in South Shields together with William's parents. They have a George Blacknell b. 1834 working for them and named as brother-in-law (hence my reason that Hannah is a Blacknell). I can't clarify this because mother's maiden name is not shown on the children's birth records. |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 25 Oct 2010 13:57 |
Carol, it's quite unusual not to have mother's maiden name on a birth cert. - is she just recorded as Tudbury? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Carol | Report | 25 Oct 2010 14:01 |
Yes on the 1861 census but Tudberry on the 1871 census. |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 25 Oct 2010 14:12 |
I don't mean the census, but the children's birth certs? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 25 Oct 2010 14:18 |
This must be her 1871, and George is named as a servant rather than brother as you would expect, so very possible he was brother-in-law to her husband but not a relative of Hannah: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 25 Oct 2010 14:20 |
Still not clear whether you have a child's birth cert, if not this looks like Eliza: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Carol | Report | 25 Oct 2010 14:22 |
Sorry for misunderstanding. The mother's name is blank on the birth records of all her children although I haven't sent for a copy of the birth certificate yet? Would it show on the certificate if it is not on the record which I have viewed? |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 25 Oct 2010 14:24 |
I am still a bit unclear - do you mean blank on Freebmd? MMN not shown till 1912. It will be on the actual cert. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
safc | Report | 25 Oct 2010 14:29 |
???? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 25 Oct 2010 14:32 |
Another thing - George born in the wrong place to be Hannah's brother. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Carol | Report | 25 Oct 2010 14:36 |
I am getting very muddled now because of all the name changes. I am related to the Blacknell family who originally lived in Hucknall, Nottinghamshire. I have both a Hannah Blacknell on my tree and a George Blacknell is her brother. Sometimes the records show it as Blacknall or Blackwell to confuse matters. I think Hannah may have married a William Tudbury also of Hucknall, Nottinghamshire. Tudbury is sometimes spelt Tudberry to confuse me even further. My direct ancestor is Hannah and George's brother Joseph Blacknell1836-1874who also travelled to the north-east and died there. |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 25 Oct 2010 14:39 |
Sorry, he does give same birthplace, apologies. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 25 Oct 2010 14:43 |
No joy as yet. You must have seen this - might be worth hanging onto as possibly some family link though not your couple: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Carol | Report | 25 Oct 2010 14:52 |
Yes many thanks I will save that. |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 25 Oct 2010 14:55 |
I can see your reasoning, and it seems pretty sound, but for life of me can't see a marriage! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Carol | Report | 25 Oct 2010 15:45 |
I've trawled the marriages but haven't found anything. I am only filling in wider parts of my tree as I have managed to complete my direct ancestors on the Blacknell family as far back as Richard 1760-1823. I keep leaving it then returning when feel like a good delve. |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 25 Oct 2010 15:56 |
I suspect you won't solve this without a child's birth cert and that might be a bit much for a peripheral family member. Annoying though - you would think these names would make it easier! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Carol | Report | 25 Oct 2010 16:04 |
Many thanks Jan. I am sure it could fit part of my wider tree somewhere. |
|||
|
safc | Report | 25 Oct 2010 16:11 |
???? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 25 Oct 2010 16:12 |
If you do make sure you let us know the result! |
|||
Researching: |