Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Misinformation on birth certificate
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Madmeg | Report | 12 Oct 2010 21:36 |
I am thinking I agree with Rosemary's conclusion. Alfred was named as North on the birth cert, even though she married him later as Alfred Dixon. Seems quite a likely story, but there will never be proof. |
|||
|
Madmeg | Report | 11 Oct 2010 20:19 |
Did you have some point to make Julie? If so, I have missed it. |
|||
|
Jonesey | Report | 11 Oct 2010 10:24 |
We all know that it is virtually impossible to positively identify the biological father of an illegitimate child. The only person who can possibly know that for certain is the child's mother and if she had sexual encounters with more than one man around the time of conception even she may not be 100% sure. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 11 Oct 2010 07:01 |
Oh look the expert is back........ |
|||
|
Madmeg | Report | 11 Oct 2010 00:10 |
I've been away for a couple of weeks, the trauma of a dying cat has overtakne me. So back to the scene, and I have to say I am not happy with the conclusions drawn here, but haven't got anything better yet. As IGP says, don't make the evidence fit. Start from basics. |
|||
|
Rosemary | Report | 10 Oct 2010 15:15 |
My likely solution is that when Elizabeth gave her surname as North then Alfred, if they were married, had to be Alfred North (not Dixon) and to cover the fact they were not married give Childs as a maiden name. I feel sad that my grandmother finding, as she thought that her father was not her biological father caused her so much pain. |
|||
|
Jonesey | Report | 10 Oct 2010 09:57 |
Being the parish priest maybe he did father half the village, you never know. (lol) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
InspectorGreenPen | Report | 10 Oct 2010 06:52 |
Or, have you considered the possibility that there are two different persons. |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 9 Oct 2010 22:20 |
& this why Elizabeth gave the name Childs |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 9 Oct 2010 22:09 |
He probably was her Dad |
|||
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link! | Report | 9 Oct 2010 19:37 |
Looks like that Thomas has a middle name of Charles: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Jonesey | Report | 9 Oct 2010 17:52 |
My best guess at Alfred's family. No father present but note the elder son's name: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Jonesey | Report | 9 Oct 2010 17:38 |
Not that it helps much but these were probably the witnesses. William was the caretaker at St Michaels. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Rosemary | Report | 9 Oct 2010 17:27 |
Witnesed by W T Paul and E Paul |
|||
|
Rosemary | Report | 9 Oct 2010 17:26 |
William Thomas Dixon was a bricklayer in 1893 |
|||
|
Jonesey | Report | 9 Oct 2010 17:22 |
Was any occupation stated for Alfred Dixon's father William Thomas Dixon? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Jonesey | Report | 9 Oct 2010 17:17 |
You know what they say, "There's nowt as queer as folk" |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Rosemary | Report | 9 Oct 2010 17:04 |
Yes that looks like it could be them. I know my great-grandmother was married to an Alfred Dixon but what I realy want to know is why was Alfred North on the birth certificate and six months later she married an Alfred Dixon. Plus it is a little stange that the father's name given is her maiden name. That's the mystery I would like to solve. |
|||
|
Jonesey | Report | 9 Oct 2010 16:54 |
Agnes's and Alfred's birthdates do seem to fluctuate a bit more than might be expected. This could be her and her parents in 1911: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Rosemary | Report | 9 Oct 2010 16:46 |
Thanks for that, but I'm more confused now. The names and places all seem to tally but the ages are all wrong. My Grandmother was Agnes E Dixon but if born in 1892 would not be 4 in 1901. And Elizabeth was 5 years younger than Alfred. |