Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Tip of the day...Fact or fiction?
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 19 Nov 2009 01:08 |
I've always believed that one can only be certain of the mother of the child |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
GranOfOzRubySlippers | Report | 19 Nov 2009 01:44 |
I have been pulled up by people following the same lines as me, I love it when they say I am wrong. WHY? Usually I have not yet purchased the cert, and the information is slightly off, they have saved me money by not purchasing the wrong certificate. I have gone down many wrong tracks and have many useless certificates. My money is better spent on the correct information. |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 19 Nov 2009 08:11 |
I also believe in 3 pieces of evidence. I was told to do that in my very early years of researching. The further you go back the harder it is, but oh, the satisfaction! |
|||
|
Madmeg | Report | 20 Nov 2009 21:39 |
Well, we have to have a sense of reason about collecting evidence. I assume that my mother is my mother cos I have a birth certificate, and she and the family confirm that she gave birth to a child on my birthday, and was ill for about a month afterwards. I assume also that my father was the lovely man I lived with till I married and if anyone dares suggest otherwise they will regret it for the rest of their lives! |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 20 Nov 2009 21:53 |
And never forget to google! Google their names, their place of birth, place of residence, their parish. It's amazing what comes up. |
|||
|
AuntySherlock | Report | 20 Nov 2009 22:22 |
And I was given an old bible which contained several flimsy sheets of paper. I never paid much attention to it. One day I looked at this dusty book which sat on a shelf. It contained a family history written onto the end papers of the bible, and on these pieces of paper. My family history, tracing ancestors back through my grandmother to Bristol 1756. |
|||
|
Jonesey | Report | 13 Nov 2012 08:36 |
3 years on and it is still a very valid question to ask. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Elizabeth2469049 | Report | 13 Nov 2012 14:07 |
Another risk of checking confirming records. I have an inherited family tree which as it goes back to 1450 is a bit short of documentary proof, though where I have been able to check it has been pretty good - the odd hiccup! So when l found many of the same names on an Ancestry tree I wrote asking for sources only to find that his source was me! - the hazards of having a Public Tree. Since then the same names crop up elsewhere on Ancestry, I suspect from my tree. I am reluctant to give up my public tree as I have had some very useful contacts through it. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Denburybob | Report | 13 Nov 2012 19:54 |
I went with a friend to register the death of his son-in-law. When we took a copy home his widow informed us that we had got the year wrong. We went back to the Registrar, who told us it couldn't be altered. Bob |
|||
|
Denburybob | Report | 13 Nov 2012 19:58 |
Further to my last message, I should have said the year of his birth. Bob |