Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Why would???
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
~~~Hz by the River~ | Report | 4 Jun 2009 10:38 |
For Julie, |
|||
|
mgnv | Report | 2 Jun 2009 00:35 |
Maybe there wasn't a 1941 census, but there certainly was a national registration around that time. How else would you get a ration book, eh? |
|||
|
Thistledown | Report | 2 Jun 2009 00:31 |
I have seen on one of the new Counties on-line on the Irish 1911 census two little girls "adopted" by different families in the same area, both girls were born in England.Both girls had same surname, but different from both families names. |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 1 Jun 2009 23:38 |
Julie |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
**Ann** | Report | 1 Jun 2009 23:26 |
You cant! Some things are best left unsaid, it is obviousely very painful for him, and I suspect many thousand of people who suffered through the war years feel the same. |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 1 Jun 2009 23:24 |
Ooo Shirley how interesting :) |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 1 Jun 2009 23:22 |
My husband grandparents had three children the first a boy they lost at 2 months in 1903 and then my MIL was born in 1905 ,Her only sister was born in 1909 and neither are with the parents on the 1911 census ,I know Mum was sent to Ireland to the paternal grandparents at around 4 years of age and the baby was with Nanas parents,Why cos Grandad and Nana could only afford to rent two rooms and no children were allowed,Both parents worked so the children were sent to family to be looked after,Mum was sent away before her sister was born so there was always sibling rivalry cos the baby went home before she did |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 1 Jun 2009 23:07 |
So how do I make a stubborn old man talk to me??? |
|||
|
**Ann** | Report | 1 Jun 2009 23:05 |
Hi Julie, |
|||
|
George_of_Westbury | Report | 1 Jun 2009 23:00 |
Julie |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
George_of_Westbury | Report | 1 Jun 2009 22:47 |
Kathleen |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 1 Jun 2009 22:47 |
OMG Ann, what a terrible tale :( I bet its really interesting though :) |
|||
|
**Ann** | Report | 1 Jun 2009 22:42 |
Oh to be a fly on the wall Julie! We can only guess at peoples circumstances all those years ago, but I have just finished a book about a british soldier who was taken prisoner in 1942 and eventually ended up in Auschwitz, apart from all the horrors of 2 years there, he eventually had to march some 700 miles to American lines before he was liberated, suffering great hardship along the way. He arrived back in the Uk weighing around 6 stone, walked up his fathers garden path knocked the door and had it shut in his face by the "new" wife!! ,saying he was not wanted, the father in the sons words was a "weak minded man" |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 1 Jun 2009 22:42 |
My grandmother died in 1931 leaving my grandfather with 7 children - the youngest (my aunt) just 6 weeks old. This aunt was brought up by a neighbour a couple of streets away and lived with this person until she got married. It happened quite a lot back then. |
|||
|
George_of_Westbury | Report | 1 Jun 2009 22:38 |
I didnt think there was 1941 census, im so dissapointed they wont have a problem, |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Kate | Report | 1 Jun 2009 22:37 |
I think - could be wrong here - sometimes perhaps a father in those days saw his role in the family as provider and generator of income and thought that child-rearing and domestic tasks were "women's work". |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 1 Jun 2009 22:33 |
SNAP, Ann. :-) |
|||
|
KathleenBell | Report | 1 Jun 2009 22:32 |
I'm not sure George but I don't think there was a census taken in 1941 and the 1931 was destroyed I think. |
|||
|
**Ann** | Report | 1 Jun 2009 22:31 |
Blimey George, we'll never know now, I dont think the census was taken in 1941! |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 1 Jun 2009 22:31 |
LOL George thats soooo mean LOL |