Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
1908
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Battenburg | Report | 12 Mar 2009 18:27 |
N |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 11 Mar 2009 11:49 |
Sorry, I had the wrong census so deleted it - it's 1891 you're looking for. |
|||
|
Ozibird | Report | 11 Mar 2009 11:42 |
1871 England Census |
|||
|
Battenburg | Report | 11 Mar 2009 11:08 |
Other opinions needed. |
|||
|
Jennifer | Report | 11 Mar 2009 07:53 |
Thank you for all your comments.I also thought it was a coincidence to find the imfomants name in the same rd and she had a daughter named Rhoda.There is no other name on certificate I'll keep looking |
|||
|
Richard in Perth | Report | 11 Mar 2009 03:31 |
Yes I have read the thread, and agree that it is quite a coincidence. What you say could well be correct, but it would mean that not only was the surname mistranscribed but also the details of the mother were incorrectly entered (as it should have read "Rhoda Robinson, formerly Bailey" - even if her husband Thomas had subsequently died and was not the father of the child). Of course such errors and omissions do occur, but also so do coincidences (especially with common names such as Robinson) - so I think that Jasper would need further proof in this case. |
|||
|
Battenburg | Report | 11 Mar 2009 03:08 |
Jasper will have to look for the missing Robinson children in 1911 to see if they are in care |
|||
|
Battenburg | Report | 11 Mar 2009 02:55 |
Richard. |
|||
|
Richard in Perth | Report | 11 Mar 2009 02:42 |
1911 Rhoda Robinson (born Hingham) is a widow living in Lambeth (no other Robinsons in the household): |
|||
|
Battenburg | Report | 11 Mar 2009 02:30 |
So we need to find Rhoda in 1891 |
|||
|
Richard in Perth | Report | 11 Mar 2009 02:23 |
The Rhoda Robinson on 1901 has husband Thomas and two children (Florrie & Rhoda) were born in Camberwell - so that seems like the right marriage that QuinsGran found above. |
|||
|
Battenburg | Report | 11 Mar 2009 01:15 |
I guess Roberson could be mistaken for Robinson if the enumerator didnt hear correctly. Its just strange that a William Bailey has a daughter called Rhoda in 1881 and is living at the correct area in 1901with a wife born in the same area |
|||
|
Madmeg | Report | 10 Mar 2009 21:09 |
The 1901 image is clearly Rhoda Robinson. |
|||
|
Battenburg | Report | 10 Mar 2009 19:38 |
Just a possibility. |
|||
|
Jennifer | Report | 10 Mar 2009 17:53 |
There is no fathers name on certif .My father went into care as soon as he was born we assume as he is on 1911 census with the family he lived with until his teens |
|||
|
Heather | Report | 10 Mar 2009 13:53 |
So Rhoda was single? I cant see a Rhoda Roberson birth Norfolk. |
|||
|
InspectorGreenPen | Report | 10 Mar 2009 12:57 |
On the 1901 Census, living at Hall Moor are William Bailey, aged 83 and his wilfe Sarah Ann Bailey, aged 62. No occupation shown. |
|||
|
Jennifer | Report | 10 Mar 2009 12:35 |
I'm trying to find my fathers mother.On his birth certificate it says he was born Hall Moor Hingham.Imformant was S A Bailey present at the birth.His mothers name was Rhoda Roberson a domestic servant who i cannot trace.She could have lived or worked at that road.I don't know what else to try |
|||
|
Heather | Report | 10 Mar 2009 12:05 |
Hall Moor Road is quiet a long road out of the village, I dare say the few cottages etc would have been known just by the names of the people living there. It is still a very rural area. |
|||
|
InspectorGreenPen | Report | 10 Mar 2009 11:59 |
I am doing a mini one name study of my Uncle's family who lived in Hingham in the 1800. A number were to be found at Hall Moor. |