Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Anne Aston c1855
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
GranOfOzRubySlippers | Report | 23 Nov 2008 03:56 |
Going by when census was held 30 March 1851 I would say that the second Hannah Aston would be the closer match for Birth. |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 23 Nov 2008 01:18 |
Adam |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Adam | Report | 22 Nov 2008 18:17 |
ok thanks andy so he could of died in 1855 but why would they ask he's proffesion if he is dead ? its all very confusing |
|||
|
Ajwyorks | Report | 22 Nov 2008 16:29 |
Status of fathers on marriage certs |
|||
|
Adam | Report | 22 Nov 2008 15:20 |
right i have there marriage cert here and she calls herself anne aston on here it was jan 10th 1874 she is 21 her father is thomas aston engineer, and he's not down as deceased so that kinda blows the 1855 death out the water |
|||
|
GranOfOzRubySlippers | Report | 22 Nov 2008 03:12 |
I also checked the image and it does look like Aston. |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 21 Nov 2008 22:57 |
For 1861, Ancestry has a Hannah "Ashlaw" aged 9 b Birkenhead. Looking at the image, the enumerator does add a flourish to a final letter n, so this could well be Ashton - misheard for Aston? |
|||
|
Kate | Report | 21 Nov 2008 19:52 |
Could be - I was just thinking, my great-great-great grandma who was always named as Hannah Holcroft on the census turned up in the baptism records at the local church as "Annie Oldcroft" - I suppose you can see how Annie/Anna/Hannah might be mixed up or misheard somehow. |
|||
|
Adam | Report | 21 Nov 2008 17:16 |
this is a bit of a nightmare is'nt it do you think anne was really called hannah ? |
|||
|
GranOfOzRubySlippers | Report | 21 Nov 2008 08:49 |
Robin, I think you have her for 1871. I still cannot find her in 1861, I would think she may be with a relative somewhere. |
|||
|
Montmorency | Report | 21 Nov 2008 08:35 |
Possibility for 1871, not helpful |
|||
|
GranOfOzRubySlippers | Report | 21 Nov 2008 08:01 |
I cannot find a Marriage yet for Hannah Hughes, still looking But think this is her on the 1841 Census, Taking into account Bury is very close to Manchester. It is just a train of thought for you to ponder. |
|||
|
GranOfOzRubySlippers | Report | 21 Nov 2008 07:48 |
There are two births for a Hannah Aston, could not find an Anne so it is either of these, providing parents of Thomas and Hannah are correct on Certificates. |
|||
|
Adam | Report | 21 Nov 2008 07:34 |
thank-you very much you may on to something there |
|||
|
GranOfOzRubySlippers | Report | 21 Nov 2008 07:19 |
So if it is the same Thomas he would have passed away sometime between 1851 and 1861?? |
|||
|
GranOfOzRubySlippers | Report | 21 Nov 2008 07:10 |
Adam the Thomas in the 1851 census is listed as Engineer so the 1861 follows this train of thought. |
|||
|
Adam | Report | 21 Nov 2008 07:06 |
thanks sylvia you get yourself to bed for now i'm just starting work (bless) |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 21 Nov 2008 06:48 |
I'm giving up, ancestry is now being very slow, and i y eyes are getting tired!! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 21 Nov 2008 06:40 |
Hi Gran |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 21 Nov 2008 06:39 |
I'm still poking around, but it's taking me longer than usual 'cos the server's acting up!! |
|||
Researching: |