Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
help and/or advice please
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Irenemac | Report | 10 Nov 2008 18:14 |
I will take a look at that site just now. Thanks |
|||
|
Irenemac | Report | 10 Nov 2008 18:13 |
can't be that then cos she married again pretty sharpish |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 10 Nov 2008 17:48 |
Irene, |
|||
|
Irenemac | Report | 10 Nov 2008 17:39 |
What if the ship went down? I have been told that some members of the family were involved in a ships fire. |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 10 Nov 2008 17:35 |
If they die on a ship, I think the death would be probably be registered at the first port of call and possibly on the overseas deaths register. |
|||
|
Irenemac | Report | 10 Nov 2008 17:29 |
thanks. If someone dies onboard ship or another country, does that mean that there won't be a record of that death here? |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 10 Nov 2008 17:23 |
There is no birth registered for a Susan Smith in Liverpool for 1867 or 1868. Registration was compulsory until 1875. |
|||
|
Kate | Report | 10 Nov 2008 17:22 |
Could be, Irene. My great-grandmother was said to have been born in Canada but was registered in West Derby - I thought she could have been born in Canada and then registered when her mother got home. (Turned out she was born in Bootle, though!) |
|||
|
Irenemac | Report | 10 Nov 2008 17:20 |
Ah! Good thinking Potty. I hadn't checked that yet. |
|||
|
Irenemac | Report | 10 Nov 2008 17:18 |
Thanks Potty, yes that's them. |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 10 Nov 2008 17:16 |
Irene, |
|||
|
Irenemac | Report | 10 Nov 2008 17:16 |
ok, thanks Kate. Logical when you think about it. |
|||
|
Kate | Report | 10 Nov 2008 17:11 |
On the death indexes on Ancestry - I was about to try the Lancashire BMD site when I found it. (I've got ancestors from the same area so I found it quite useful. |
|||
|
Irenemac | Report | 10 Nov 2008 17:09 |
No Portland Rose it's still there but I've changed my username to make things easier. I think you helped me last time |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 10 Nov 2008 17:06 |
Elizabeth is shown as married in the 1871. The other two children born Liverpool. So, looks as if Austin was alive in 1871. |
|||
|
Irenemac | Report | 10 Nov 2008 17:06 |
Thanks so much. |
|||
|
Click ADD REPLY button - not this link! | Report | 10 Nov 2008 17:05 |
Irene, |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 10 Nov 2008 17:04 |
This looks like the family in 1871 - Susan's POB is given as New York, United States: |
|||
|
Kate | Report | 10 Nov 2008 17:01 |
Just found this on the IGI, which throws things out - I'm trying to get onto the census but Ancestry is being funny at the moment. |
|||
|
Kate | Report | 10 Nov 2008 16:56 |
Have you seen these two deaths? With it saying in 1871 that Elizabeth is an annuitant, it sounds as though Austin may be dead and she has been left an annuity or some kind of yearly allowance. |