Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
CAN ANYONE HELP
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 17 Nov 2008 20:20 |
Dean says thank you by PM! |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 9 Nov 2008 02:42 |
Any thoughts there, Dean? |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 7 Nov 2008 17:47 |
The name shifts geographically in later years: |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 7 Nov 2008 17:33 |
This looks like the death of the John, born in Burton Pidsea, who was in London in 1871 (too young to be your Emma's father, born circa 1821): |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 7 Nov 2008 17:30 |
I wonder whether this is mother Jane's death (possibly before the 1851 census and registered later): |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 7 Nov 2008 17:23 |
If you search trees here at GR you will find that GR member Martin has all these people in his tree: |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 7 Nov 2008 17:20 |
More tidbits. |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 7 Nov 2008 16:35 |
Batch for marriages in Burton Pidsea, 1813 to 1836: M108801. |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 7 Nov 2008 16:27 |
The earlier batch for Sutton in Holderness is C107462. |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 7 Nov 2008 16:23 |
This is the Gibson grandparents in 1841 in Keyningham: |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 7 Nov 2008 16:07 |
What I find a little confusing you see, Dean, is that only the mother's name is given on the two baptism records. |
|||
|
Ericthered | Report | 7 Nov 2008 15:49 |
No, the name is unlikely to have 'changed'..........you have to think laterally when searching for people on censuses..........mostly, they couldn't read or write, so the spelling of their name usually depended on how the enumerator 'heard' it............. |
|||
|
Dean | Report | 7 Nov 2008 15:49 |
your starting to confuse me even more with this info |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 7 Nov 2008 15:44 |
also |
|||
|
Dean | Report | 7 Nov 2008 15:43 |
thanks for all the help, her fathers name was john he is also very hard to , find so could the name have changed from frawkins to frokins, yes she did marry william island. |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 7 Nov 2008 15:43 |
Births Sep 1839 |
|||
|
Dean | Report | 7 Nov 2008 15:42 |
thanks for all the help, her fathers name was john he is also very hard to , find so could the name have changed from frawkins to frokins |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 7 Nov 2008 15:39 |
Indeed. Unless this isn't the Emma Frockings who married in 1862 -- but her details in 1871 match up too. |
|||
|
Ericthered | Report | 7 Nov 2008 15:37 |
So the age wasn't very much 'out'........... |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 7 Nov 2008 15:33 |
Of course, the IGI gives her birth as 1839, not 1836. |