Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Looking for John Clark(e) b abt 1821
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Julie | Report | 27 Apr 2022 12:43 |
I’m hoping your collective family history know how and abilities to ferret out information might help me with documentary evidence to support pointers from my DNA matches. I have a small group of shared matches. We all link to each other in DNA terms. The closest match is descended from a brother of my great grandfather. 2 matches have small trees, a 3rd has a larger tree that is wholly US based and I can’t yet see the connection to England. By checking and building back the 2 small trees I have found a common link between them, documentary evidence indicates that they are both descended from James Clarke and Ann Slator. James in turn being the son of John Clark(e) and Jane Bailey, who married in 1803 in Terrington St Clement Norfolk. The couple appear to have migrated around the ”Fens” with children born in Norfolk, Cambridgeshire and Lincolnshire. They eventually settled in Tydd Gote, Lincolnshire (part of the parish of Tydd St Mary). I’m not convinced I have found all of their children as I have some gaps, but that is just an aside. |
|||
|
nameslessone | Report | 27 Apr 2022 13:02 |
You haven’t added a link to your previous thread. |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 27 Apr 2022 13:44 |
I have not in fact suggested that Harriett is the daughter of John and Ann. As indicated I have only found him on the 1851 with his mother, sister and his nephew (they are not his wife and son on the census, hence the different surname for the grandson). I merely have her giving the name John Clark as her father with no indication, she also gives her maiden name as Clark on the various birth registrations of her children, some of whom are registered as Clark on the basis that she was no longer living with the man she married. She is on census data with birthplace Holbeach, or variants close to Holbeach. I also believe I have found her as a teenager as a domestic servant, but I haven't found her on the 1861 census. |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 27 Apr 2022 13:53 |
Harriet’s birth may not have been registered, but odds are that she was baptised. Have you looked for a baptism? |
|||
|
nameslessone | Report | 27 Apr 2022 14:11 |
A pity that you can't find the registration as it would have given her fathers occupation at the time. |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 27 Apr 2022 14:11 |
Erika, no baptism record has been found, despite my own and others efforts. The thread regarding Harriett was posted here a long time ago and I am unable to post a link as I can't locate it. |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 27 Apr 2022 14:15 |
nameslessone, I, and others, have traced both young ladies, and others with the "right" name and managed to demonstrate none of them are "my" Harriett. |
|||
|
Von | Report | 27 Apr 2022 14:19 |
Can you give a link to a census for Harriet please. I realise this would be after her marriage. |
|||
|
nameslessone | Report | 27 Apr 2022 14:21 |
Thank you. |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 27 Apr 2022 14:22 |
If the thread hasn't been deleted, it will be under 'my threads' |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 27 Apr 2022 14:29 |
https://www.genesreunited.co.uk/boards/board/ancestors/thread/1395834 |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 27 Apr 2022 14:44 |
This could be the old thread, from 2011: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 27 Apr 2022 14:49 |
Don't know why I couldn't find the thread! Thanks to those who did. Having gone to the thread myself, some information on it is way out of date. Harriett married John Hayes in 1875, but by 1879 they were living apart, my great grandfather was born in 1879 as the result of a liaison with someone who lived a few doors down the road (DNA evidence supports this). John already had another "wife" and children by the 1881 census, he ended up in Lancashire and "married" again. Harriett had a total of 8 children, but apart from 1901, she didn't have an adult male residing in the household at census time. |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 27 Apr 2022 14:53 |
One of the censuses you found?? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 27 Apr 2022 14:55 |
1881 |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 27 Apr 2022 14:58 |
Marriage cert claims her deceased father was a Labourer |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 27 Apr 2022 14:59 |
Looking at the old thread it doesn't fully cover the baptism/birth registration issues, so I think I must have posted a different thread on that, which might not have been on this site. In any case, the matter of birth registration, baptism and childhood census were thoroughly searched for by several people and no trace of any of these found. |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 27 Apr 2022 15:01 |
You mentioned a marriage to John Hayes (as opposed to Robert Hayes in the 1875 marriage): |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 27 Apr 2022 15:07 |
The entries referred to above are the ones already found. Whilst they shed some light on Harriett herself, they don't really help in tracing John Clark. Harriett didn't move house as an adult, this isn't apparent from the census schedules as the location has been known by more than one name over the years. |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 27 Apr 2022 15:14 |
The marriage to John Hayes is a red herring, it seemed to be "right" way back in 2011, when I had only just started researching. Some of the children's birth registrations are under the surname Hayes with Robert names as father (I have copies). As I understand it this would have been the correct way as the husband of a married woman was presumed to be the father of a child, unless he was dead. Robert is also named as her husband on her death certificate of which I have a copy. |