Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Thomas Luty & wife Jane
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 22 Apr 2019 17:35 |
Ah well!!! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 22 Apr 2019 11:45 |
I agree: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
alviegal | Report | 22 Apr 2019 11:45 |
Just a wee snippit mentioning Thomas and an Allcock boy. |
|||
|
alviegal | Report | 22 Apr 2019 10:52 |
Nice try Sylvia but I think this is probably that Thomas. Julie's Thomas has well and truly disappeared. Personally, I think he's changed his name. |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 22 Apr 2019 00:00 |
????????????????????????? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 21 Apr 2019 16:45 |
Thanks safc, I think this is Thomas' mother as the Long Bennington burial reg has Ann inserted as if omitted, although she was otherwise always just Elizabeth. |
|||
|
safc | Report | 21 Apr 2019 14:51 |
hi |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 21 Apr 2019 14:11 |
Just to round things up with Jane Burrows, I have now traced her on all the census data after her first marriage and the following seems to be her story. Having married Thomas Luty in 1855, the couple separated around 1868. In 1871 she resided with George Allcock in Newark. She married him at the register office on 15 May 1873. However, he died suddenly on 2 Jan 1877. She then married William Watson in late 1880. They are together on the 1881 census. William died in 1886. On the 1891 census she has William Booth residing with her as a "lodger", they married 26 Jan 1896. Jane died in 1907, William died in 1910. First husband Thomas Luty is still a mystery, but it seems likely that he died sometime between the 1871 census and Jane's marriage to George Allcock in May 1873, I haven't managed to find a death regn & there is no burial in his home parish of Long Bennington. The fact that the marriage to George was reported in the Lincolnshire press would I think have alerted someone who knew her to a bigamous marriage, had that been the case. |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 20 Apr 2019 22:22 |
Thanks alviegal, either she was a naughty girl, or Thomas Luty died between the 1871 census and her marriage in 1873 allowing the couple to wed legally. Another marriage cert or register fiche to view I think. |
|||
|
alviegal | Report | 20 Apr 2019 22:09 |
Think this is Jane's second marriage. |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 20 Apr 2019 22:07 |
Thanks for your efforts ArgyllGran,. It appears Jane may have been a bit of a lass, having looked at the 1871 census she was living with a George Adcock, with no relationship to him as head of the household shown. If the marriage Jane Watson/William Booth is her, (I'd lay good odds it is) she's either married very quickly after William Watson's death, or had already split with him. Unfortunately the transcript for the marriage from the church marriage register on FMP doesn't show martial status or fathers names, need to get sight of a cert. or fiche of the register. I can only assume Thomas went abroad, or his name is so badly transcribed on census data that he's well hidden and/or his death regn is mis-transcribed - unless someone else can manage to track him down. |
|||
|
alviegal | Report | 20 Apr 2019 21:56 |
Not helping with your query, but there was also another daughter who sadly died as an infant. |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 20 Apr 2019 21:15 |
I'm afraid I can't see any sign of your Thomas anywhere after 1871. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 20 Apr 2019 20:04 |
You mentioned a Thomas with a wife Martha, who emigrated. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 20 Apr 2019 19:38 |
Thanks for the extra info, looks like the couple split some time after Thomas was conceived. . |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 20 Apr 2019 19:24 |
Jane and young Thomas in 1871 - Jane calling herself unmarried: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 20 Apr 2019 19:24 |
Looks like you have sorted out Jane for me ArgyllGran.Many thanks. |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 20 Apr 2019 19:20 |
What you are assuming is an 1868 Luty/Burrows marriage is the birth record for young Thomas Luty. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 20 Apr 2019 19:18 |
??? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
ArgyllGran | Report | 20 Apr 2019 19:17 |
Then another marriage ??? |
|||
Researching: |